M. Proj et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 60 (2019) 151078
3
step a, the ratio between the reagents was adjusted, the reaction
was carried out in an ice bath, and methyl iodide was diluted in
DMF before adding it dropwise to the reaction mixture. In step b,
the nitro group was reduced to the amine group in the presence
of iron metal and HCl. Finally, the benzimidazole-2-thione core
was formed using the same procedure as for compound 1; this
time leading to a single regioisomer 2. By this alternative synthetic
procedure, we could unambiguously confirm the position of the
methyl group relative to the chlorine atom (Scheme 1). For full
synthetic procedures, see the ESI. Three benzimidazole-2-thione
derivatives were also commercially available: 3 (Innovapharm
Ltd.), 4 (Fluorochem Ltd.) and 6 (Innovapharm Ltd.). Compounds
3 and 4 were used without further purification, while 6 was recrys-
tallized from EtOH. Notably, the analytical data for purchased com-
pounds 3 and 6 was the same as for the synthesized compounds
(compound 4 was not synthesized).
The appropriate deuterated solvents for NMR spectroscopy, i.e.
pyridine-d5 and/or acetone-d6, were selected based on the solubil-
ity and peak separation for all analyzed compounds. An example of
peak separation for 3 in various solvents (acetone-d6, pyridine-d5,
DMSO-d6, TFA-d and CD3OD) is presented in the ESI (Fig. S1). The
complete assignment of 1H and 13C chemical shifts was straightfor-
ward following these steps: i) splitting pattern and coupling con-
stants of the trisubstituted benzene ring distinguished the 5- and
6-chloro derivatives from the 4- and 7-chloro derivatives; ii)
NOESY experiments further distinguished between the 5- and 6-
chloro, and between the 4- and 7-chloro analogs; iii) HSQC exper-
iments determined which hydrogens are connected to which car-
bons; iv) HMBC experiments and/or; v) comparison between
different isomers enabled the identification of the remaining car-
bons. It is important to state that with HMBC spectroscopy only
correlations through three covalent bonds (meta) were observed
for compounds 1–6. Tables 1 and 2 contain chemical shift data in
pyridine-d5 and acetone-d6. For graphical representations and
assigned spectra in other solvents see the ESI (Figs. S2–5).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of chlorinated benzimidazole-2-thione derivatives. Reagents
and conditions: (a) MeI, NaH, DMF, 0 °C, 1 h, 47% yield; (b) Fe, HCl (37%), EtOH,
80 °C, 6 h, 76% yield; (c) potassium ethyl xanthate, EtOH (96%), H2O, 80 °C,
overnight, 27% yield for 1, 16% yield for 2; (d) i) TrCl, TEA, anhydrous THF, Ar, rt,
overnight; ii) MeI, KOH, acetone, rt, 2–5 h; iii) 5% AcOH in MeOH, 65 °C, 30 min, 58%
yield for 2 and 3, 73% yield for 5 and 6.
For example, in the 1H NMR spectrum of compound 2 two dou-
blets of doublets and one triplet were present in the aromatic
region, which means that only 4-chloro or 7-chloro substitutions
were possible. NOESY experiment showed coupling between the
CH3 protons and the doublets of doublets of C7-H (Fig. 3a). There-
fore, compound 2 was determined to be 4-chloro substituted. The
first step in assigning the 13C NMR spectrum was to determine
which hydrogens are connected to which carbons using HSQC
experiments. The remaining signals were identified by observing
imidazole-2-thione (4) (Scheme 1). Compound 2 was also prepared
using an alternative procedure where the nitrogen atom was
methylated prior to cyclization. To increase the selectivity of
monomethylation vs. dimethylation for the aniline derivative in
Table 1
1H NMR chemical shifts in pyridine-d5 and acetone-d6 (d in ppm) of benzimidazole-2-thiones 1–6. Splitting patterns and ortho, meta and para coupling constants are given in
parentheses. See ESI (Figs. S2–3) for graphical representations.
Compound Solvent
NH
C4-H
C5-H
C6-H
C7-H
CH3
–
1
Pyridine-d5 14.88 (bs, 1H), –
14.59 (bs, 1H)
7.22 (1H) or 7.20 (1H)a
7.10 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H)
7.22 (1H) or
7.20 (1H)a
Acetone-d6 11.77 (bs, 1H), –
11.59 (bs, 1H)
7.22–7.14 (multiplet, 3H)
–
2
3
4
Pyridine-d5 14.95 (bs, 1H)
Acetone-d6 11.88 (bs, 1H)
–
–
7.21 (1H)a
7.10 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H)
7.32–7.20 (multiplet, 3H)
7.02 (dd, J = 8.0, 0.9 Hz, 1H) 3.70 (s, 3H)
3.71 (s, 3H)
Pyridine-d5 14.73 (bs, 1H) 7.19 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H) 7.06 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H)
Acetone-d6 11.75 (bs, 1H) 7.22 (dd, J = 7.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H)
7.13 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H) –
7.21–7.15 (multiplet, 2H)
4.06 (s, 3H)
4.05 (s, 3H)
–
Pyridine-d5 14.54 (bs, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 1.7, 0.6 Hz, 1H) –
7.24 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H) 7.28 (dd, J = 8.4, 0.6 Hz, 1H) –
14.50 (bs, 1H)
Acetone-d6 11.46 (bs, 2H) 7.25 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H)
–
–
7.17 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H) 7.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H)
–
5
6
Pyridine-d5 14.65 (bs, 1H) 7.44 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H)
Acetone-d6 11.59 (bs, 1H) 7.26 (dd, J = 1.9, 0.4 Hz, 1H) –
7.25 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 2H) 7.06 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H)
7.22 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H) 7.31 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H)
3.68 (s, 3H)
3.70 (s, 3H)
Pyridine-d5 14.60 (bs, 1H) 7.23 (1H)a
Acetone-d6 11.58 (bs, 1H) 7.25 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H)
7.26 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H) –
7.20 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H) –
7.32 (dd, J = 1.6, 0.5 Hz, 1H) 3.73 (s, 3H)
7.41 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H) 3.71 (s, 3H)
a
Signal overlaps with the solvent peak.