ically enriched, 1,4-dicarbonyl derivatives. Extension of this
methodology to related substrates bearing two different elec-
tron–withdrawing groups on the same olefinic carbon is a
current object of study in our laboratories.
We thank the MCYT (Grants BQU2001-2376 and PPQ2000-
1341; fellowship to A. P.), and the Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie for financial support. The donation of chemicals by
Degussa AG, BASF AG, and Bayer AG is gratefully ac-
knowledged.
Notes and references
† As discussed in ref. 3, the electrophilic reactivity of nitroalkenes and
alkylidenemalonates can be a priori correlated with the pK values in
nonaqueous solvents of the anions generated upon addition. See also: W. N.
Olmstead and F. G. Bordwell, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 3299.
‡ The formation of this product is consistent with activation of the reagent
1A by the Lewis acid, followed by nucleophilic attack of a second molecule
of free reagent. Air oxidation of the resulting a-hydrazinohydrazone finally
affords the undesired product 4.
§ Sub-stoichiometric amounts of MgI2 were also effective as catalyst, but
yields and selectivities were lower in this case. For instance, 3a was
obtained with 51% de and 77% yield by using 0.1 eq of MgI2 under the
conditions given Table 1. Drying of the catalyst (0.05 mbar, 40 °C, 5 h) is
essential in order to obtain reproducible results.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: a: MgI2, CH2Cl2. b: HS(CH2)2SH (1.5
eq.), BF3·OEt2 (2.5–5 eq). c: O3, Me2S, 278 °C?rt. d: Ra-Ni, MeOH.
1
measured by HPLC or H NMR LIS experiments carried out
with Eu(hfc)3, thereby confirming the absence of racemization
in this reaction, even for the more sensitive aromatic sub-
strates.
As illustrative examples of another potentially useful trans-
formation, Ra-Ni mediated desulfuration of 7b,d,f was also
effected to afford malonates 8b (75%), 8d (70%), and 8f (71%),
respectively. Comparison of the optical rotation of (S)-8f with
literature data was used for the assignment of its absolute
configuration.†† As the transformations 3?7 and 7?8 are
assumed to proceed without inversion of neighbor stereogenic
centers, the (3S) configuration of 3f and 7f was deduced thereof.
The absolute configuration of all other products was assigned
by analogy.
¶ As in related enamines, the pyrrolidine ring confers high nucleophilicity
to the aza-enamine system: G. Häfelinger and H.-G. Mack, in The
Chemistry of Enamines, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1994, pp. 1–85.
∑ Synthesis of compounds 3. Method A. To a stirred, cooled solution of 2a–c
(1 mmol) and MgI2 (1 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added a solution
of hydrazone 1B (1.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) under an argon atmosphere.
The mixture was stirred until completion (TLC), diluted with more CH2Cl2
(10 mL), washed with H2O, dried (MgSO4), and purified by flash
chromatography. Method B. To a stirred, cooled solution of 2d–g (1 mmol)
and hydrazone 1B (2 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added MgI2 (1
mmol) under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was then treated as
described above.
** Extensive racemization was observed starting from the sensitive
aromatic compound 3d in optically pure form, as determined by shift
experiments using Eu(hfc)3. A much higher stability was expected in the
aliphatic series, but, starting from optically pure 3a, a 5–20% racemization
was also observed after chromatographic purification.
†† (S)-8f: had [a]21D +44.3 (c 0.7, MeOH). Lit: [a]24D +45.0 (c 1, MeOH:
J.-Y. Legros, M. Toffano and J.-C. Fiaud, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 3235.
In summary, the MgI2-promoted Michael addition of enantio-
pure formaldehyde hydrazone 1B to alkylidene malonates 2
appear as a convenient method for the synthesis of enantiomer-
Table 1 Synthesis of hydrazono malonates 3a–g
Yielda
(%)
3
R
T (°C)
t (h)
deb
Conf.
a
b
c
d
e
f
Me
Et
CH2CH2Ph
Ph
p-NO2C6H4
2-Naphthyl
278
278
278
0
24
24
48
7
3
6
91
95
70
88
98
98
97
78c
(S,R)
(S,R)
(S,R)
(S,S)
(S,S)
(S,S)
(S,S)
1 K. Yasuda, M. Shindo and K. Koga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38,
3531.
2 D. A. Evans, T. Rovis, M. C. Kozlowski and J. S. Tedrow, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1999, 121, 1994.
3 S. J. Blarer and D. Seebach, Chem. Ber., 1983, 116, 2250; K. Tomioka,
K. Yasuda and K. Koga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27, 4611; J. Martens
and S. Lübben, Tetrahedron, 1991, 47, 1205; Catalytic version: J. M.
Betancort, K. Sakthivel, R. Thayumanavan and C. F. Barbas III,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 4441; W. Zhuang, T. Hansen and K. A.
Jørgensen, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 2001, 347.
4 D. Enders, A. S. Demir and B. E. M. Rendenbach, Chem. Ber., 1987,
120, 1731; D. Enders, A. S. Demir, H. Puff and S. Franken, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1987, 28, 3795.
68c
70c
76 ( > 98)
80 ( > 98)
90 ( > 98)
79 ( > 98)
0
0
0
g
6
a Yield of isolated product. b Determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude
reaction mixtures; in parenthesis: de of purified major diastereomer.
c Inseparable mixture of diastereomers.
5 For example see: H. Stetter and F. Jonas, Chem. Ber., 1981, 114, 564; H.
Cerfontain and P. C. M. van Noort, Synthesis, 1980, 490; H. Ahlbrecht
and H.-M. Komptes, Synthesis, 1983, 645.
6 D. Enders, P. Gerdes and H. Kipphardt, Angew. Chem., 1990, 102, 226;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29, 179 ; D. Enders, J. P. Shilvock
and G. Raabe, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 1617, and literature
cited therein.
7 R. Fernández and J. M. Lassaletta, Synlett, 2000, 1228.
8 J. M. Lassaletta, R. Fernández, E. Martín-Zamora and E. Díez, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7002; E. Díez, R. Fernández, C. Gasch, J. M.
Lassaletta, J. M. Llera, E. Martín-Zamora and J. Vázquez, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 5144.
9 D. Enders and J. Vázquez, Synlett, 1999, 629; D. Enders, J. Vázquez and
G. Raabe, Chem. Commun., 1999, 701; D. Enders, J. Vázquez and G.
Raabe, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 893.
Table 2 Synthesis of dithioketals 7a–g
Yielda
7
R
t (h) (%)
ee
Conf. [a]24D (c, CH2Cl2)
a
b
c
d
e
f
Me
Et
CH2CH2Ph
Ph
p-NO2C6H4
2-Naphthyl
96
48
96
48
24
48
16
87
70
60
61
65
63
70
79b
70c
68b
(R)
(R)
(R)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
+5.1 (1.1)
+11.8 (0.9)
+0.8 (1.0)
+6.6 (1.1)
22.1 (1.0)
+9.6 (1.2)
+28.1 (1.3)
> 98c
> 98b
97b
g
> 98b
10 D. Enders, R. Syrig, G. Raabe, R. Fernández, C. Gasch, J. M. Lassaletta
and J. M. Llera, Synthesis, 1996, 48.
11 E. Díez, A. M. López, C. Pareja, E. Martín-Zamora, R. Fernández and
J. M. Lassaletta, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 7955.
a Yield of isolated product. b Determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary
phase column (Daicel Chiralpak AD). c Determined by 1H NMR shift
experiments using Eu(hfc)3.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 498–499
499