1958
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 51, No. 10, October, 2002
Vatsadze et al.
—CH=N—); 8.75 (d, 2 H, Py(2), Py(6), J = 6.0 Hz). 13C NMR,
δ: 120.5, 122.2, 122.6, 132.3, 142.4, 149.7, 150.6, 158.2.
Synthesis of complexes 5—7 (general procedure). The comꢀ
plexes were synthesized according to a described procedure2
using a slow diffusion of solutions of the ligand (2 equiv.) in
anhydrous methylene chloride and silver(I) tetrafluoroborate
(1 equiv.) in dry acetonitrile. The finely crystalline precipitate
that formed was filtered off, thoroughly washed with a fivefold
excess of methylene chloride and acetonitrile to remove possible
admixtures of the initial reactants, and dried in vacuo with weak
heating.
similar main reflection sets. This suggests that the comꢀ
pounds possess similar unit cell systems.
Thus, the novel exoꢀbidentate ligands containing two
γꢀpyridyl fragments and their complexes with AgBF4 were
synthesized.
Experimental
1
H and 13C NMR spectra (δ, ppm, J/Hz) were recorded on
a Varian VXRꢀ400 instrument with working frequencies of 400
and 100 MHz, respectively, at 28 °С in CDCl3. IR spectra
(ν/cm–1) were recorded on a URꢀ20 instrument in Nujol. Xꢀray
diffraction analysis was carried out on a Dronꢀ3M diffractometer
(λ(Cu—Kα) = 1.5418 Å, θ/2θ scan mode: 5.5—65 with the
0.05 increment), and dn reflections were presented (1000•I/Imax).
Melting points of substances were determined in an open capilꢀ
lary and were uncorrected. All reagents were commercial
(Acros®, Lancaster®) and used without additional purification.
1,4ꢀBis[(E )ꢀ2ꢀ(4ꢀpyridyl)ethenyl]benzene (1) was syntheꢀ
sized using a described procedure5 in 62% yield with m.p. 250 °С.
1H NMR, δ: 7.05 (d, 2 Н, CH=CH—Ar, J = 16.3 Hz); 7.29 (d,
2 H, Py—CH=CH, J = 16.3 Hz); 7.37 (d, 4 H, Py(3), Py(5), J =
6.2 Hz); 7.55 (s, 4 H, Ar(2), Ar(3), Ar(5), Ar(6)); 8.58 (d, 4 H,
Py(2), Py(6), J = 6.2 Hz). 13C NMR, δ: 120.9, 127.1, 128.8,
129.3, 130.4, 135.3, 144.3, 150.3. IR, cm–1: 1620—1600 (br,
С=С, C=N).
Condensation of anilines with 4ꢀpyridinecarbaldehyde (genꢀ
eral procedure). A mixture of aldehyde (20 mmol) and aniline
(20 mmol) in toluene (50 mL) containing piperidine (0.1 mL)
was boiled for 2 h with a Dean—Stark trap. The solvent was
evaporated, and the residue was recrystallized from 2ꢀpropanol
or ethanol.
N,N´ꢀBis[(E )ꢀ4ꢀpyridylmethylidene]ꢀ1,4ꢀphenylenediamine
(2). The yield was 92%, m.p. 165 °С (from 2ꢀpropanol).
1H NMR, δ: 7.04 (d, 4 H, Py(3), Py(5), J = 5.5 Hz); 8.02 (s,
4 H, Ar(2), Ar(3), Ar(5), Ar(6)); 8.44 (s, 2 H, —CH=N—); 8.56
(d, 4 H, Py(2), Py(6), J = 5.5 Hz). 13C NMR, δ: 121.8, 123.7,
134.7, 150.8, 151.2, 156.5. IR, cm–1: 1630 (C=C), 1600 (C=N),
1580 (Py). Found (%): C, 75.26; H, 5.01; N, 19.39. C18H14N4.
Calculated (%): C, 75.51; H, 4.93; N, 19.57.
Complex of 1,4ꢀbis[(E )ꢀ2ꢀ(4ꢀpyridyl)ethenyl]benzene with
AgBF4 (5). The reaction of compound 1 (0.568 g, 2 mmol)
with AgBF4 (0.192 g, 1 mmol) afforded a yellow powder
(150 mg, 32%) with m.p. 353 °С (decomp.). IR, cm–1: 1615 (br,
C=C, C=N), 1050 (br, BF4). Found (%): C, 50.40; H, 3.36;
N, 5.86. C18H14N4•AgBF4. Calculated (%): C, 50.15; H, 3.37;
N, 5.85. Xꢀray diffraction pattern: 9.0416 (563), 4.5387 (1000),
3.3650 (486).
Complex of N,N´ꢀbis[(E )ꢀ4ꢀpyridylmethylidene]ꢀ1,4ꢀpheꢀ
nylenediamine with AgBF4 (6). The reaction of compound 2
(0.568 g, 2 mmol) with AgBF4 (0.192 g, 1 mmol) afforded a
yellow powder (130 mg, 29%) with m.p. 381 °С (decomp.).
IR, cm–1: 1615 (br, C=N); 1050 (br, BF4). Found (%): C, 44.62;
H, 2.78; N, 11.48. C19H15N3•AgBF4. Calculated (%): C, 44.95;
H, 2.93; N, 11.65. Xꢀray diffraction pattern: 9.0484 (475), 4.5064
(1000), 3.3648 (350).
Complex of Nꢀ[(E )ꢀ4ꢀpyridylmethylidene]ꢀ4ꢀ[(E)ꢀ2ꢀ(4ꢀpyriꢀ
dyl)ethenyl]aniline with AgBF4 (7). The reaction of compound 3
(0.568 g, 2 mmol) with AgBF4 (0.192 g, 1 mmol) afforded a dark
yellow powder (130 mg, 29%) with m.p. 376 °С (decomp.).
IR, cm–1: 1615, 1590 (C=С, C=N), 1050 (br, BF4). Found (%):
C, 48.02; H, 3.15; N, 9.21. C18H14N4•AgBF4. Calculated (%):
C, 47.54; H, 3.13; N, 8.75. Xꢀray diffraction pattern: 9.2979
(760), 4.5062 (1000), 3.3837 (686).
The authors thank F. M. Spiridonov (Department of
Chemistry, Moscow State University) for help in Xꢀray
diffraction analysis. This work was financially supported
by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project
No. 99ꢀ03ꢀ33094).
Nꢀ[(E )ꢀ4ꢀPyridylmethylidene]ꢀ4ꢀ[(E)ꢀ2ꢀ(4ꢀpyridyl)etheꢀ
nyl]aniline (3) was synthesized similarly to compound 1 in 70%
yield with m.p. 193 °С. 1H NMR (protons of the 4ꢀpyridylꢀ
carbimine fragment are marked by stroke), δ: 7.00 (d, 1 H,
ArꢀСH=CH, J = 16.4 Hz); 7.26 (d, 2 H, Ar(2), Ar(6), J =
7.2 Hz); 7.29 (d, 1 H, СH=CH—Py, J = 16.4 Hz); 7.36 (d, 2 H,
Ar(3), Ar(5), J = 7.2 Hz); 7.57 (d, 2 H, Py(3), Py(5), J =
6.0 Hz), 7.74 (d, 2 H, Py(3´), Py(5´), J = 6.0 Hz); 8.46 (s, 1 H,
—CH=N—); 8.57 (d, 2 H, Py(2), Py(6), J = 6.0 Hz); 8.67 (d,
2 H, Py(2´), Py(6´), J = 6.0 Hz). 13C NMR, δ: 120.7, 121.5,
122.2, 126.0, 131.8, 132.5, 135.6, 142.5, 144.4, 150.1, 150.5,
150.9, 157.8. IR, cm–1: 1615 (C=C), 1590 (C=N). Found (%):
C, 78.31; H, 5.53; N, 12.52. C19H15N3. Calculated (%): C, 79.98;
H, 5.30; N, 14.73.
References
1. A. J. Blake, N. R. Champness, P. Hubberstey, W. S. Li, M. A.
Withersby, and M. Schröder, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1999,
188, 117.
2. A. J. Blake, N. R. Champness, S. M. Chung, W. S. Li, and
M. Schröder, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1675.
3. D. M. Ciutin, Y. B. Dohg, M. D. Smith, T. Barclay, and
H. C. Loye, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 2825.
4. S. R. Batten, J. C. Jeffery, and M. D. Ward, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 1999, 292, 231.
5. A. J. Amoroso, A. M. Cargill Thompson, J. P. Maher, J. A.
McCleverty, and M. D. Ward, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 4828.
6. P. K. Kadaba, J. Med. Chem., 1988, 31, 196.
Nꢀ[(E )ꢀ4ꢀPyridylmethylidene]ꢀ4ꢀbromaniline (4). The yield
1
was 81%, m.p. 74 °С (cf. Ref. 6: m.p. 81 °С). H NMR, δ: 7.10
(d, 2 H, Ar(3), Ar(5), J = 8.5 Hz); 7.51 (d, 2 H, Ar(2), Ar(6), J =
8.5 Hz); 7.71 (d, 2 H, Py(3), Py(5), J = 6.0 Hz); 8.40 (s, 1 H,
Received March 15, 2002;
in revised form July 1, 2002