Organic Letters
Letter
directly oxidized by single electron transfer (SET) to generate
an N-radical, which triggers the subsequent 1,5-HAT and
Minisci-type arylation.9,11 Encouraged by these results, we
wondered whether a similar alkyl radical via 1,5-HAT can be
trapped by suitable fluorination reagents to give the
fluorination product. As shown in Table 1, we were pleased
70% isolated yield (entry 1). The mono- and difluorination
products are difficult to separate by silica gel chromatography.
The HFIP/H2O ratio had a significant impact to the mono- vs
difluorination selectivity. Changing the ratio of HFIP/H2O
from 4.6:1 to 1:1 gave comparable yield of 2 but dramatically
reduced monoselectivity (entry 3). Replacing HFIP with
trifluoroethanol (TFE) gave lower yield (entry 4). Use of other
organic solvents such as CH3CN and acetone caused
significantly lower reactivity (entries 5 and 6). The substituent
on the phenyl ring of the arylsulfonamide protecting group
(PG) had a significant impact to the reactivity. For example,
replacing the 4-methoxy group (PG1) with a 4-methyl group
(PG3) gave 21% of the fluorination product. Use of
trifluoromethyl sulfonamide (PG8), trifluoromethylacetamide
(PG9), and benzamide (PG10) gave no desired product.
Table 1. Reaction Optimization of δ C−H Fluorination of
N-Protected Pentylamine
−
Selectfluor I (BF4 ) served as the best fluorination reagent
a
(entries 7−12). Photocatalyst and visible light irradiation were
critical (entries 13−16). The addition of (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-
piperidin-1-yl)oxyl or oxidanyl (TEMPO) reagent abolished
the reaction (entry 18).
change from the standard conditions (equiv of yield of 2 (2m/2d)
entry
reagents)
(%)
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
No change
76 [70 ] (>20:1)
HFIP/H2O (4.6:1 → 5.5:1)
HFIP/H2O (4.6:1 → 1:1)
HFIP is replaced with TFE
HFIP is replaced with CH3CN
HFIP is replaced with acetone
2 equiv of Selectfluor I (BF4−) is used
3 equiv of Selectfluor I (BF4−) is used
Selectfluor I (OTf−) is used
Selectfluor II (BF4−) is used
Selectfluor II (OTf−) is used
Selectfluor is replaced with NFSI
0.5 mol % of Ru(bpy)3Cl2 is used
1.5 mol % of Ru(bpy)3Cl2 is used
without Ru(bpy)3Cl2
70 (>20:1)
67 (2.5:1)
50 (11.8:1)
25 (19:1)
22 (>20:1)
69 (>20:1)
80 (>20:1)
70 (>20:1)
75 (19.7:1)
43 (>20:1)
ND
64 (>20:1)
66 (>20:1)
ND
ND
41 (>20:1)
The scope of amines was then examined under the
optimized conditions A and B with different ratios of HFIP
and H2O solvents (Scheme 2). Primary amines with both
linear and cyclic alkyl scaffolds can work. Most linear alkyl
amines proceeded with excellent δ regioselectivity (δ: other
isomers >20:1) (e.g., 4−7) under conditions A using a 4.6:1
mixture of HFIP and H2O. Notably, the reaction of hexylamine
3 gave a moderate regioselectivity. Besides the δ methylene C−
H bonds, fluorination at the more inert δ methyl group can
also work albeit in lower yield. Conditions B using 1:1 mixture
of HFIP and H2O gave slightly higher yield (see 8).
Fluorination of the δ tertiary C−H of 9 proceeded in moderate
yield along with the formation of 20% of cyclized pyrrolidine
byproduct. In comparison to 1, substrate bearing a α-methyl
substitunt showed higher reactivity and gave significantly more
difluorination product 10d under conditions A. A 1.1:1 ratio of
mono- vs difluorination product was obtained under
conditions B. Similarly, 16 bearing an α-substituent was
significantly more reactive than 14. Fluorination of δ
methylene C−H bonds of cyclic scaffolds proceeded in varied
yield and selectivity. For example, the reactions of cyclooctyl-
amine and cyclododecylamine gave 12 and 13 in 60% and 50%
yield, respectively. Small amounts of difluorination products of
cyclooctylamine at both the δ and δ′ positions were obtained
and can be readily separated from the monofluorination
product by silica gel column chromatography. δ-Methyl
fluorination of α-amino acid substrates gave the corresponding
fluorinated product in low to moderate yield under conditions
B (17−19).
in darkness
under air
Methods for selective double C−H fluorination of
unactivated methylene groups remain scarce.7b,8d,13 We were
pleased to find that reaction of 20 under slightly modified
condition B with 3.5 equiv of Selectfluor I (BF4) and 0.5 mol
% of Ru(bpy)3Cl2 gave 10 in a 1.4:1 ratio of di- and
monofluorination (d/m) (Scheme 3). Furthermore, subjecting
the purified product to the same fluorination treatment gave
10d with excellent selectivity and in good overall yield. As
exemplified by 21d and 23d, the two-round protocol worked
well for α-substituted alkyl amines, forming the otherwise
difficult-to-access products in good yield and with excellent
difluoroselectivity.14
to find that reaction of p-methoxyphenyl (PMP) sulfonyl
pentylamine 1 with 2.5 equiv of Selectfluor I (BF4) and 1.0
mol % of Ru(bpy)3Cl2 photocatalyst under the irradiation of
household compact fluorescent lamp (CFL, 23 W) in the
mixed solvents of hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)12 and water
(4.6/1) at 30 °C for 12 h gave the desired monofluorination
product 2m along with a small amount of difluorination 2d in
As shown in eq 1, the p-methoxyphenylsulfonyl group in
product 4 can be cleanly removed by the treatment of SmI2/
3632
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3631−3635