M. Gutie´rrez-Na6a et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 3039–3042
3041
the cooling transitions was observed during the follow-
ing heating run. DSC analysis of [Cs+·(1)2] gave similar
results. Finally, the X-ray diffraction patterns of both
sandwich complexes were typical of a mesomorphic
phase with a sharp diffraction peak in the small angle
region and a diffuse band in the wide angle region. The
exact structure determination of these mesophases is
still under progress.
In conclusion, a new OPV-benzocrown ether conjugate
was prepared and its binding selectivity for alkali metal
ions evaluated by ESMS. Interestingly, treatment of 1
with a potassium or a cesium salt afforded sandwich
complexes with new properties. Effectively, 1 itself does
not exhibit any liquid crystalline properties, but the
association of two ligands 1 by coordination leads to
supramolecular assemblies with mesomorphic proper-
ties. In addition, it can be added that the OPV-benzo-
crown conjugate 1 is a strongly luminescent compound
and further studies aiming to determine its potential as
a sensor for the detection of cations are under progress.
Figure 2. ES mass spectrum (Vc=40 V) recorded from a
mixture of CH3CO2Na, CH3CO2K, CH3CO2Cs and 1 in a
1:1:1:9 molar ratio in CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:1) (ꢀ=non-iden-
tified impurity, ꢁ=Rb+·(1)2 sandwich complex resulting
from the presence of traces of rubidium salt into the commer-
cially available alkali metal salts).
Acknowledgements
The alkali metal ion complexes of crown ether 1 were
prepared by slow evaporation of CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:1)
solutions of 1 and CH3CO2 M+ (M+=Na+, K+ or Cs+)
−
This research was supported by the French Ministry of
Research (ACI Jeunes Chercheurs) and a fellowship
from the CONACyT to M.G.N.; H.N. and A.V.D.
thank the TMR Project EU No. ERBFM-
RXCT1980226 on Nanometer Size Metallic Complexes
for the financial support of the ES-MS work. We
further thank L. Oswald and B. Heinrich for technical
help.
in various proportions. Homogeneous samples were
only obtained when the stoichiometry of the initial
mixture of 1 and CH3CO2 M+ was appropriate. In
−
other words, the complexes were obtained in a pure
form when the molar ratio of 1 and CH3CO2 M+
−
corresponded to the stoichiometry of the host–guest
complex. In the case of sodium, only equimolar mix-
tures afforded homogeneous samples suggesting the
formation of the 1:1 host–guest complex [Na+·1]. In
contrast, the potassium and cesium host–guest species
were obtained as 2:1 sandwich complexes. These obser-
vations are in good agreement with the ESMS studies.
Effectively, 2:1 complexes have been observed for
potassium and cesium, but not for sodium.
References
1. Mu¨llen, K.; Wegner, G. Electronic Materials: The
Oligomer Approach; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998.
The thermal properties of 1, [Na+·1], [K+·(1)2] and
[Cs+·(1)2] were investigated by a combination of polar-
ized optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction studies.
Whereas uncomplexed 1 and [1·Na+] do not exhibit any
liquid crystalline behavior, the sandwich complexes [K+·
(1)2] and [Cs+·(1)2] show mesomorphic properties. POM
investigations revealed a fluid birefregent phase from 84
to 106°C for [K+·(1)2] and from 82 to 108°C for [Cs+·
(1)2]. However, the liquid-crystalline phases could not
be identified by POM. Effectively, in both cases, the
birefregent optical textures observed on cooling the
samples from the isotropic phase were non-characteris-
tic. The phase transitions observed by POM were con-
firmed by the DSC studies. During the heating, DSC
analysis of [K+·(1)2] gave three endotherms at 70°C
(crystal–crystal phase transition, associated enthalpy
value: DH=24.7 J/g), 84°C (melting point, DH=16.5
J/g) and 106°C (clearing point, DH=1.3 J/g). On cool-
ing, three exotherms were observed and reversibility of
2. (a) Yu, L.; Bao, Z. Adv. Mater. 1994, 6, 156–159 and
references cited therein; (b) Altmann, M.; Enkelmann, V.;
Lieser, G.; Bunz, U. H. F. Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 726–728;
(c) Maddux, T.; Li, W.; Yu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 844–845; (d) Nierengarten, J.-F.; Guillon, D.; Hein-
rich, B.; Nicoud, J.-F. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1233–1234;
(e) Hoag, B. P.; Gin, D. L. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 1546–
1551; (f) Bacher, A.; Benthley, P. G.; Bradley, D. D. C.;
Douglas, L. K.; Glarvey, P. A.; Grell, M.; Whitehead, K.
S.; Turner, M. L. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2985–2990.
3. (a) El-ghayoury, A.; Peeters, E.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.;
Meijer, E. W. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1969–1970; (b)
Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Jonkheijm, P.; Peeters, E.; Meijer,
E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 409–416.
4. (a) Eckert, J.-F.; Nicoud, J.-F.; Guillon, D.; Nierengarten,
J.-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6411–6414; (b) Eckert,
J.-F.; Maciejczuk, U.; Guillon, D.; Nierengarten, J.-F.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 1278–1279.
5. Gu, T.; Ceroni, P.; Marconi, G.; Armaroli, N.; Nieren-
garten, J.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6432–6439.