Inorganic Chemistry
Article
with lighter alkali-metal hydridoborates, [(L)M][HBPh3] (M
= Li, Na, K; L = tris{2-(dimethylamino)ethyl}amine).12
Interestingly, among these boron remained as one of the
most attractive targets to explore the catalytic role of its
complexes for hydroelementation reactions.8,12,13 Boron
compounds capable of exhibiting strong Lewis acidic behavior,
such as B(C6F5)3, were very promising candidates.13 In this
context, cationic complexes of boron were supposed to fulfill
the requirements of Lewis acidity even better.14,15 It has been
shown that borenium cations offer a perfect balance of stability
and Lewis acidity.16,17
Borenium cations with a hydride functionality have been
considered important reagents with potential applications as
metal-free catalysts in processes such as hydrogenation,18a,b
imine hydrogenation,18c dihydrogen activation, and alkyne 1,2-
carboboration.19 At present, a few well-characterized cationic
mononuclear borenium hydride species are known.20−24
Previously, we have synthesized the borenium hydride cations
[LBH]+[HB(C6F5)3]− (1) and [LBH]+[B(C6F5)4]− (2)
(Figure 1) supported by a bis(phosphinimino)amide ligand
Lewis acid activation mechanism operating with catalyst 2.
Additionally, the intermediate [LBH]+[PhCH2−O−B-
(C6F5)3]− (S12), formed from the reaction between 1 and
PhCHO, was a key intermediate that was successfully isolated
and characterized. This intermediate was further used as a
precatalyst for hydrosilylation of another carbonyl substrate to
experimentally support the hydride migration from the
hydridic borate to the carbonyl as the key step of the
hydrosilylation involving 1.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
The hydridoborenium borate ion pairs [LBH]+[HB(C6F5)3]−
(1) and [LBH]+[B(C6F5)4]− (2) were generated by hydride
abstraction from LBH2 with B(C6F5)3 and [Ph3C]+[B-
(C6F5)4]−, respectively (LH = [{(2,4,6-Me3C6H2N)P-
(Ph2)}2N]H).24 Compounds 1 and 2 proved to be efficient
catalysts for the hydrosilylation of carbonyl compounds
(aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes and ketones) in CHCl3
medium and showed good catalytic activity at 40 and 70 °C,
respectively. In a control experiment, under similar catalytic
reaction conditions, the use of LBH2 as the catalyst showed no
reaction between benzaldehyde and Et3SiH. This study
justified the need for generation of the cationic complexes 1
and 2 from their common precursor, LBH2. The reaction
conditions for hydrosilylation (with respect to the relative
quantity of reagents and catalyst, reaction temperature, and
duration) were optimized by using benzaldehyde as the
Reducing the catalyst loading from 5 mol % to 2.5 mol %
does not affect the conversion of the desired product; however,
a catalyst loading lower than 2.5 mol % increased the reaction
duration, slowed the conversion, and lowered the purity of the
product. Good catalyst performance was thus obtained on
employing 2.5 mol % of 1 or 2 and 1.0 mmol of benzaldehyde
with 1.2 mmol of Et3SiH in CHCl3. Under these conditions,
quantitative conversion of benzaldehyde to Et3Si−O−CH2Ph
(3a) occurred after 1 h at 40 °C with catalyst 1 and after 7 h at
70 °C with catalyst 2. Usually, solvents play an important role,
possibly by interacting with the transient or stable species
formed during the course of the catalytic reaction.25 Chloro-
form was found to be the most suitable solvent among the
solvents compatible with this reaction (toluene, THF,
Supporting Information). Use of a polar coordinating solvent
such as THF slowed down the reaction, probably due to the
formation of the coordinatively saturated THF adduct of 1 and
2 that delays the substrate binding to the boron center. The
Figure 1. (top) Hydridoborenium cations (1 and 2). (bottom)
Hydrosilylation of carbonyl compounds. Hydrosilylation catalyzed by
1 involves [HB(C6F5)3]− as the hydride source, whereas with 2 the
reaction proceeds with Lewis acid activation of the carbonyl group.
and demonstrated their Lewis acid behavior as well.22,24 In a
continuation of our efforts to exploit the Lewis acidity of these
ionic complexes and to discover new catalysts from main-group
compounds, herein we employed 1 and 2 for the hydro-
silylation of aldehydes and ketones (Figure 1). Currently, only
two reports are available that utilize [9-BBN·(2,6-lutidi-
1
formation of 3a was confirmed by its H NMR spectrum,
which showed a singlet corresponding to the benzylic −CH2
moiety at 4.73 ppm. A quartet and triplet due to the −OSiEt3
group appeared at 0.64 and 0.97 ppm, respectively. In the 13C
NMR spectrum, signals for −OSiEt3 (4.5 and 6.8 ppm) and
−CH2OSiEt3 (64.7 ppm) as a result of hydrosilylation also
revealed the formation of 3a. Subsequently, various aldehydes
and ketones were smoothly converted to their corresponding
silyl ethers 3a−x (Table 1) and 4a−l (Table 2), respectively, in
very good yields under the optimized reaction conditions.
Halogenated benzaldehydes could be easily converted to
their corresponding triethylsilyl ethers (3b−e,t,u), and no σ-
bond metathesis between the halogen moiety and Et3SiH was
observed. In our attempts to explore the substrate scope, we
have also been able to demonstrate good chemo- and
regioselectivity of our catalysts toward carbonyls in the
ne)]+NTf2 and {Al[OC(CF3)3]4]− salts of a ferrocene-based
−
planar-chiral borenium cation to catalyze the hydrosilylation of
ketones.14a,d Mechanistic investigations of these catalysts
suggest the borenium ion activation of Et3SiH as the key
step, similar to that outlined for B(C6F5)3-catalyzed hydro-
silylation of carbonyls by Piers and co-workers.4c In contrast to
these, herein we have observed that the hydride functionality
plays an important role in catalysts 1 and 2 and that these
catalysts adopt reaction pathways different from those for
previously reported borenium ion catalyzed carbonyl hydro-
silylations. The combination of the Lewis acidic hydridobore-
nium cation and the hydridic borate in 1 assist the catalysis
reaction more efficiently in comparison to the predominant
B
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX