1,3-diene.7 Any unreacted starting material or the isomerized
1,3-diene product could be chemically separated from the
desired 1,4-diene 4 by treatment of the reaction mixture with
phenyl triazodione (PTAD); the PTAD undergoes cycload-
dition with the conjugated dienes, and the desired product 4
can be cleanly separated from these cycloaddition products.
Hydrovinylation of dienes bearing aryl substituents (3a,b)
as well as 1-vinylcycloalkenes (3c-h) proceeded with
excellent 1,2-addition regioselectivity. For certain substrates
bearing a resident stereocenter (e.g., 3d,f,g), hydrovinylation
was not stereoselective, giving a 1:1 mixture of diastereo-
meric products. In contrast, hydrovinylation of the steroidal
diene 3h proceeded with excellent regio- and stereoselec-
tivity, giving a single diastereomer 4h in good isolated yield.
Since assignment of the C20 configuration of the product
4h was not possible on the basis of NMR spectral data, a
crystalline derivative was sought. To this end, hydroboration/
oxidation of 4h proceeded only at the vinyl group to afford
the primary alcohol 5 (Scheme 1). Oxidation of 5 with Jones
Table 1. Ru-Catalyzed Hydrovinylation of 1,3-Dienes
Scheme 1
reagent, followed by treatment of the crude product with
diazomethane, gave a separable mixture of ester 68 and
spirocyclic lactone 7.9 Crystals of 7 suitable for X-ray
diffraction analysis revealed the relative configurations within
the molecule;10 since the precursor 3h was prepared from
optically pure estrone,11 the absolute configurations at the
C17 and C20 stereocenters of 7 were assigned as (R) and
(S), respectively. Thus, the hydrovinylation product 4h has
the 20(S) configuration, which is opposite to the configura-
tion of most naturally occurring steroids [i.e., 20(R)].
Recently, a nonnatural 20(S) vitamin D3 analogue has been
reported that selectively induces bone formation.12 While
there are many strategies for the preparation of the 20(R)
side chain,13 there is a general lack of stereoselectiVe routes
to side chains with the 20(S) configuration.14
a From ref 5b. b Mixture of diastereomers (1:1). c Single diastereomer.
functionality. In certain cases, the reaction was terminated
prior to complete consumption of starting material 3, as
prolonged contact with the catalyst led to isomerization of
the initially formed 4 to the more stable conjugated 3-methyl-
(3) (a) Bayersdorfer, R.; Ganter, B.; Englert, U.; Keim, W.; Vogt, D. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1998, 552, 187-194. (b) Albert, J.; Cadena, M.; Granell,
J.; Muller, G.; Ordinas, J. I.; Panyella, D.; Puerta, C.; Sanudo, C.; Valerga,
P. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3511-3518. (c) Englert, U.; Haerter, R.;
Vasen, D.; Salzer, A.; Eggerling, E. B.; Vogt, D. Organometallics 1999,
18, 4390-4398. (d) Wegner, A.; Leitner, W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1999, 1583-1584. (e) Bosmann, A.; Francio, G.; Jenssen, E.; Solinas, M.;
Leitner, W.; Wasserscheid, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2697-
2699. (f) Francio, G.; Faraone, F.; Leitner, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 736-737. (g) Nomura, N.; Jin, J.; Park, H.; RajanBabu, T. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 459-460. (h) Nandi, M.; Jin, J.; RajanBabu, T. V.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9899-9900. (i) Park, H.; RajanBabu, T. V.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 734-735.
(4) (a) Beger, J.; Duschek, C.; Gericke, C. J. Prakt. Chem. 1974, 316,
952-962. (b) Buono, G.; Siv, C.; Peiffer, G.; Triantaphylides, C.; Denis,
P.; Mortreux, A.; Petit, F. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1781-1782. (c) Hilt,
G.; du Mesnil, F.-X.; Luers, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 387-
389.
(5) (a) Yi, C. S.; Lee, D. W.; Chen, Y. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2043-
2045. (b) Yi, C. S.; He, Z.; Lee, D. W. Organometallics 2001, 20, 802-
804.
(7) Isomerization (over longer reaction periods) is observed with both
catalysts 1 and 2. Thus, at least for catalyst 1, this isomerization cannot be
attributed to the presence of acid.
(8) Both the 20(S)- and 20(R)-isomers of the methyl ether corresponding
to benzyl ether 6 have been previously prepared. The close similarity of
their literature NMR spectral data does not allow for an unambiguous
assignment. Trost, B. M.; Verhoeven, T. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
3435-3443.
(9) Formation of γ-lactones from 4-penten-1-ols or δ-lactones from
5-hexen-1-ols via oxidation with chromium reagents has been previously
reported. (a) Chakraborty, T. K.; Chandrasekaran, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984,
25, 2895-2896. (b) Schlecht, M. F.; Kim, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
127-130. (c) Rathore, R.; Vankar, P. S.; Chandrasekaran, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4079-4082.
(10) Bennett, D. W.; Siddiquee, T. A.; Murphy, K. L.; Haworth, D. T.;
He, Z.; Donaldson, W. A. J. Chem. Cryst. Submitted for publication. CCDC
number 201892.
(6) Neither 1,4-diphenyl-1,3-butadiene or 2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene
reacted with ethylene in the presence of either 1 or 2.
(11) De Riccardis, F.; Meo, D.; Izzo, I.; Di Filippo, M.; Casapullo, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1965-1970.
1568
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 9, 2003