2156 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 6, 1999
Notes
Ta ble 1. Ad d ition of Silyl En ol Eth er s to
r,â-Un sa tu r a ted Ca r bon yl Com p ou n d s in 5 M LP NM
depends on the basicity of the medium. We propose that
the 1,2-addition occurs by the reaction of the silyl enol
ether to the carbonyl group that is activated by the
coordination of the lithium ion.3 In the case of ketones,
for the 1,4-addition to proceed it is necessary to use at
least 2 equiv of the silyl enol ether which parallels the
behavior observed in the Michael addition reactions in
LPDE.5 Hence we conclude that the silyl transfer mech-
anism proposed earlier in the case of the Michael reac-
tions in LPDE medium5 might operate for the 1,4-
addition reactions in LPNM. The increased Lewis acidity
of the lithium ion is responsible for the enhanced reactiv-
ity of R,â-unsaturated carbonyl compounds toward silyl
enol ethers in LPNM in comparison to that in LPDE.
acceptor
R1 R2
yield (%)a
1,4-addition 1,2-addition
enol
ether
time
(h)
ref
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
3a Ph Me
Ph Me
3b Ph Ph
Ph Ph
8
16
10
20
17
16
24
4a
5a
4b
5b
4c
4d
5d
80
85
82
6a
7a
6b
7b
6c
6d
7d
0
0
0
13
14
15
15
78
0
3c Me
3d Ph
Ph
H
H
H
<10b
<10b
<10b
73
75
70
Exp er im en ta l Section
16
a
b
Isolated yield after purification. Based on 1H NMR spectral
Gen er a l Meth od s. Preparation of 5 M LPDE and the
instrumentation used are described earlier.3 Nitromethane (1
L) (analytical grade) was mixed with concentrated H2SO4 (150
mL) and allowed to stand for 24 h at room temperature. It was
separated and washed with water followed by aqueous NaHCO3
and then again with water. It was dried over anhydrous CaCl2,
filtered, and fractionally distilled using a vigreux column. The
distillate was stored over activated molecular sieve (4 Å) in an
amber colored bottle. Anhydrous lithium perchlorate (53 g) was
dissolved in dry nitromethane (100 mL) under N2 atmosphere
with ice bath cooling to yield a clear and free flowing solution.
The dissolution was not as exothermic as in the case of the
preparation of 5 M LPDE.3 (Caution: Solutions of lithium
perchlorate in organic solvents must be handled with care!20)
integration.
Ta ble 2. Mich a el Ad d ition of Silyl En ol Eth er s to Cyclic
Un sa tu r a ted Keton es in 5 M LP NM
acceptor
enol
ether
duration
(h)
yield (%)a
R1
R2
R3
ref
Gen er a l P r oced u r e. In a typical experiment the carbonyl
compound (2 mmol) was dissolved in 5 M LPNM (2 mL) under
N2 atmosphere. To this solution the enol silyl ether (6 mmol)
was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature
until the disappearance of the starting materials as shown by
TLC. The reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath and diluted
with CH2Cl2 (15 mL) followed by addition of water (10 mL). The
organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was ex-
tracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL). The combined extracts were
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Removal of solvent on the rotary
evaporator followed by column chromatographic purification on
silica gel yielded pure products. Except for compounds 6c,d , the
others are literature known compounds and were characterized
by IR, NMR (1H and 13C), and mass spectroscopy. Compounds
6c,d were characterized in the present study by IR, 1H (400
MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR, and mass spectroscopic data by
comparison with that of 7d .
2-((E)-1-Hyd r oxy-3-p h en yl-2-p r op en yl)cyclop en ta n on e
(6c). Yield: 73%. IR (CCl4): 3484 (νOH), 1734 (νCdO) cm-1. Isomer
I: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.2 (m, 5H), 6.61 (d, 1H, J ) 16
Hz), 6.19 (dd, 1H, J ) 5.8 and 16 Hz), 4.75 (m, 1H), 3.3 (s, br,
OH), 2.8-1.5 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 220.3
(s), 136.6 (s), 130.6 (d), 129.9 (d), 128.5 (d), 127.6 (d), 126.5 (d),
70.8 (d), 54.2 (d), 39.1 (t), 23.4 (t), 20.7 (t) ppm. Isomer II: 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.2 (m, 5H), 6.6 (d, 1H, J ) 16 Hz),
6.15 (dd, 1H, J ) 16 and 6.84 Hz), 4.4 (m, 1H), 3.3 (s, br, OH),
2.5-1.5 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 221.5 (s),
136.5 (s), 131.5 (d), 128.8 (d), 128.5 (d), 127.7 (d), 126.5 (d), 73.4
(d), 53.9 (d), 38.6 (t), 26.4 (t), 20.5 (t) ppm; MS (70 eV, EI) m/z
216 (M+, 15), 198 (30), 133 (40), 84 (100), 77 (70), 55 (60).
1
2
1
2
1
2
8a
8b
8c
H
H
H
H
H
H
Me
Me
H
H
Me
Me
H
12
16
24
38
48
48
9a b
10a b
9bc
75
70
80
74
0
17
17
17
17
i-C3H5
i-C3H5
H
10bc
9c
H
H
10c
0
a
b
Isolated yield after purification. 1:1 mixture of diastereo-
isomers. c mixture of four diastereoisomers.
shifted to 1705 cm-1 in 5 M LPNM. In the case of 3a the
CdO stretching frequency is 1712 cm-1 in nitromethane,
which remained unaltered in 5 M LPNM. Similar results
were observed with benzaldehyde and acetophenone in
that the CdO stretching frequency of the former is
shifted from 1724 cm-1 in nitromethane to 1712 cm-1 in
LPNM whereas that of the latter remained unchanged
at 1692 cm-1. These results suggest that aldehydes are
selectively activated in LPNM, which is primarily due
to the steric factors that govern the coordination of the
solvated lithium ion to the carbonyl oxygen. These
changes to the lower wavenumbers in the stretching
frequency of the carbonyl functional group are consistent
with the coordination of the lithium ion to the carbonyl
oxygen lone pair. The carbonyl stretching frequency shifts
are lower in the case of LPDE in comparison with ether.3,5
For example the carbonyl stretching frequency of benz-
aldehyde is shifted from 1708 cm-1 in ether to 1699 cm-1
in 5 M LPDE. The extent of the shift is a qualitative
reflection of the Lewis acidity of the lithium ion which
2-((E)-1-Hyd r oxy-2-bu ten yl)cyclop en ta n on e (6d ). Yield:
75%. IR (CCl4): 3504 (νOH), 1737 (νCdO) cm-1. Isomer I: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.6 (m, 1H), 4.5 (m, 1H), 4.0 (br, s, OH),
2.5-1.5 (m, 7H), 1.7 (d, 3H, J ) 7.0 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) δ 221.3 (s). 131.5 (d), 130.8 (d), 70.9 (d), 54.1 (d),
39.2 (t), 23.4 (t), 20.7 (t), 17.7 (q) ppm. Isomer II: 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.4 (m, 1H), 4.2 (m, 1H), 4.0 (br, s, OH), 2.5-1.5
(m, 7H), 1.72 (d, 3H, J ) 7.2 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 223.0 (s), 128.3 (d), 127.2 (d), 73.5 (d), 53.8 (d), 38.8
(15) Narasaka, K.; Soai, K.; Aikawa, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem.
Soc. J pn. 1976, 49, 779-783.
(16) Nakamura, E.; Shimizu, M.; Kuwajima, I.; Saikata, J .; Yokoya-
ma, K.; Noyori, R. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 932-945.
(17) Boyer, J .; Corriu, R. J .; Perz, R.; Reye, C. Tetrahedron 1983,
39, 117-122.
(18) Weghe, P. V.; Collin, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 3881-3884.
(19) Kobayashi, S.; Hachiya, I.; Iakahori, T.; Araki, M.; Ishitani, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6815-6818.
(20) See: (a) Silva, R. A. Chem. Eng. News 1992, Dec 21, 2. (b) Reetz,
M. T.; Gansa¨uer, A. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 6025-6030.