toward K562 cells in the low micromolar range. The most active
compound is 7-O-cinnamoyl derivative 14 that displayed 27-fold
higher potency when compared to lead 1 and showed similar
activity as DOX in the culture of these cells. The highest potency
in the culture of HL-60 cells was recorded after treatment with 13
(IC50 0.89 µM), which is similar to that observed for the
commercial drug doxorubicin (IC50 0.92 µM) as well as for the
parent compound 1 (IC50 1.21 µM) in the same cell line.
Cinnamoate 14 is the most active analogue against Jurkat cells. It
is 57-fold more potent than natural product 1 in the same cell
culture, but was over 8-fold less active then DOX against this cell
line. Raji cells are the least sensitive to lead 1. Analogues 12 and
14 are the most potent compounds against this malignant cell
line, being approximately 3-fold more active than 1 and almost 4-
times less active than DOX. Trichlorobenzoyl derivative 12
showed the highest potency toward MCF-7 cells (IC50 0.62 µM).
It exhibited 42-fold stronger activity with respect to lead 1 and
approximately 3-times lower potency when compared to DOX.
The parent compound 1 and all synthesized analogues (12–14)
exhibited notable antiproliferative effects on MDA-MB 231 cells,
with IC50 values in the low-micromolar range. The most active
molecule against this cell line is 7-O-trichlorobenzoyl derivative
12 (IC50 0.02 µM) being over 100-fold more potent than 1. In the
same time, molecule 12 exhibited 4.5-fold higher potency than
DOX in this cell line. Additionally, this molecule represents the
most active compound synthesised in this work. (−)-Cleistenolide
(1) and analogues 12–14 demonstrated diverse antiproliferative
effects toward HeLa cells in the range of IC50 0.21–14.02 µM.
The highest potency in the culture of these cells was recorded
after treatment with 14 (IC50 0.21 µM), which was approximately
35-fold more active than lead 1. However, comparing to DOX,
this analogue exhibited 3-fold lower activity against HeLa cells.
The most potent (−)-cleistenolide mimic toward the A549 cell
line is compound 14, that exhibited over 8 and 2.5-fold higher
potency when compared to lead 1 and DOX, respectively.
231 and HeLa cells, all of the remaining cell lines were more
sensitive to analogues 12–14 than to lead 1. Certain compounds
showed very potent antitumour activity, especially analogues 12
(IC50 0.02 µM against MDA-MB 231 cells) and 14 (IC50 0.21 µM
against HeLa cells), which displayed the highest activity of all
compounds under evaluation. A brief SAR study points to the
structural features that are beneficial for antiproliferative activity
of synthesized lactones, such as presence of either electron-
withdrawing or electron-donating substituents in the aromatic
ring, as well as the presence of cinnamoyl functionality instead of
benzoyl group at the O-7 position. This represents a possible clue
for the development of a variety of new anticancer agents bearing
an α,β-unsaturated δ-lactone scaffold and modified aromatic
moieties. This will be the subject of our future studies.
Acknowledgments
Financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science and
Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia is
acknowledged (Grant No. OI1612036).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, full
characterization data, and copies of NMR spectra of final
products) associated with this article can be found, in the online
version. These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the
most important compounds described in this article.
References and notes
1. Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 311.
2. (a) Pereira, F.; Madureira, A. M.; Sancha, S.; Mulhovo, S.; Luo, X.;
Duarte, A.; Ferreira, M.-J. U. J. Ethnopharm. 2016, 178, 180; (b) Bressy,
C.; Vors, J.-P.; Hillebrand, S.; Arseniyadis, S.; Cossy, J. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 10137; (c) Tiseni, P. S.; Peters, R. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 5325; (d) Boucard, V.; Broustal, G.; Campagne, J. M. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 225; (e) Harris, J. M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 2983.
3. Samwel, S.; Mdachi, S. J. M.; Nkunya, M. H. H.; Irungu, B. N.; Moshi,
M. J.; Moulton, B.; Luisi, B. S. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2007, 2, 737.
4. (a) Kumar, T. V.; Babu, K. S.; Rao, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53,
1823; (b) Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, B. P.; Pandurangam, T.; Yadav, J. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2306; (c) Ramesh, P.; H. Meshram, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2443; (d) Babu, D. C.; Ashalatha, K.; Rao,
C. B.; Jondoss, J. P. S.; Venkateswarlu, Y. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011, 94,
2215; (e) Schmidt, B.; Kunz, O.; Biernat, A. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75,
2389.
As the data in Table 1 further reveal the introduction of either
three electron-withdrawing groups (such as Cl) or an electron-
donating group (such as OMe), in the aromatic ring of 1,
improved antiproliferative activity of the analogue against the
majority of tumour cell lines under evaluation (the exemptions
are HL 60, MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cells). Replacement of the
C-7 benzoyl group in 1 by a cinnamate moiety caused similar
effects. Namely, the cinnamic isostere of 1 (analogue 14) showed
the increased antitumour potency against seven of eight tumour
cell lines under evaluation (except against HL-60 cells).
5. Cai, C.; Liu, J.; Du, Y.; Linhardt, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 75, 5754.
6. Babu, D. C.; Selavam, J. J. P.; Reddy, D. K.; Shekhar, V.;
Venkateswarlu, Y. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 3815.
In conclusion, a facile stereoselective total synthesis of (−)-
cleistenolide (1) from the commercially available chiral template
diacetone D-glucose (2) has been achieved employing one-C-
atom degradation of the chiral precursor 2, (Z)-selective Wittig
olefination, and the subsequent δ-lactonisation as key steps. The
final O-benzoyl protection of primary alcohol group, followed by
the acetylation of secondary hydroxyls gave the target molecule 1
in seven steps and 33% overall yield. The same experimental
methodology provided an access to three novel (−)-cleistenolide
mimics (compounds 12, 13 and 14) for biological testing. Natural
product 1 showed moderate to potent in vitro anticancer activities
against the all human malignant cell lines under evaluation. The
highest potency of 1 was recorded in the culture of HL-60 cells
(IC50 1.21 µM), which is similar to that observed for the
commercial drug doxorubicin (IC50 0.92 µM). This is the first
record in the literature on antitumour activity (−)-cleistenolide.
So far this molecule was known only by its antibacterial and
antifungal activity. Generally, analogues 12–14 appeared to be
more potent than lead 1. With the exception of HL-60, MDA-MB
7. Ghogare, R. S.; Wadavrao, S. B.; Narsaiah, A. V.Tetrahedron Lett. 2013,
54, 5674.
8. Mahajan, P. S.; Gonnade, R. G.; Mhaske, S. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014,
8049.
9. Benedeković, G.; Kovačević, I.; Popsavin, M.; Francuz, J.; Kojić, V.;
Bogdanović, G.; Popsavin, V. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 4581 (and
references cited therein).
10. (a) de Fatima, A.; Modolo, L. V.; Conegero, L. S.; Pilli, R. A.; Ferreira,
C. V.; Kohn, L. K.; de Carvalho, J. E. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 3371;
(b) Blazquez, M. A.; Bermejo, A.; Zafra-Polo, M. C.; Cortes, D.
Phytochem. Anal. 1999, 10, 161.
11. De, P.; Baltas, M.; Bedos-Belval, F. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 1672.
12. See the Supplementary data for details.
13. (a) Iwata, M.; Ohrui, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1981, 54, 2837; (b)
Josephson, K. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1929, 472, 217.
14. Ohle, H.; Euler, E.; Lichtenstein, R. Ber. 1929, 62, 2885.
15. (a) Harvey, J. E.; Raw, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2611;
(b) Valverde, S.; Martin-Lomas, M.; Herradon, B.; Garcia-Ochoa, S.
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 1895.
16. Still, W. C.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4405.