X. Zheng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 881–884
883
Scheme 4.
results in a 50% decrease in cell growth after 6 days
incubation. The given values are mean values of three
experiments.
stituted chrysin derivatives (8 and 13) were more efficient
for inhibition of HT-29 cells than for SGC-7901 cells.
In conclusion, we have synthesized a series of chrysin
derivatives.17 The preliminary biological activities screen-
ing tests indicated that 8-bromo-5-hydroxy-7-
methoxychrysin 11 was identified as the most potent
anti-HT-29 tumor cells and 5,7-dimethoxy-8-iodochrysin
3 showed the most significant activity against SGC-7901
tumor cells.
Results and Discussion
The pharmacological results were summarized in Table
1 for anti-HT-29 and anti-SGC-7901 cells respectively.
It appeared that these closely related molecules did not
display a remarkable difference in cytotoxicity. As
shown in Table 1, we disclosed that compounds 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12 showed stronger cytotoxicity
towards SGC-7901 cells than chrysin, and compounds
2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 13 had better inhibitory
activities to HT-29 cells than chrysin. 8-Bromo-5-
hydroxy-7- methoxychrysin 11 was identified as the
most potent anti-HT-29 tumor cells and 5,7-dimethoxy-
8-iodochrysin 3 showed the most significant activity to
SGC-7901 tumor cells. Although general structure–
activity relationship of the chrysin derivatives to anti-
cancer effect was not elucidated from these data, the
following points were noteworthy: (1) The 8-substituted
chrysin derivatives (3, 11 and 12) had stronger activities
against both SGC-7901 and HT-29 tumor cells. (2) The
6,8-dihalo substituted chrysin derivatives (9 and 10)
showed better inhibitory activities against SGC-7901
cells than against HT-29 cells. While the other 6,8-disub-
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China and the Ministry of Education of China for
financial support.
References and Notes
1. (a) Flavonoids in Health and Disease Rice-Evans, C. A.,
Packer, L., Eds. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1997. (b) Ber-
trand, A.; Olivier,D. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1999, 82, 2201.
2. Chan, E. C. H.; Patchareewan, P.; Owen, L. W. J. Cardio-
vasc. Pharmacol. 2000, 35, 326.
3. Lee, J. H.; Kim, Y. S.; Lee, C. K.; Lee, H. K.; Han, S. S.
Saengyak Hakhoechi 1999, 30, 34.
4. Shin, J. S.; Kim, K. S.; Kim, M. B.; Jeong, J. H.; Kim, B. K.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 869.
5. Zanoli, P.; Avallone, R.; Baraldi, M. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 117.
6. Liu, Y. L.; Ho, D. K.; Cassady, J. M. J. Nat. Prod. 1992,
55, 357.
Table 1. In vitro cytotoxicity against the SGC-7901 and HT-29 cell
lines
7. Hebtemariam, S. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 775.
8. Kubo, I.; Kinst-Hori, I.; Chaudhuri, S. K.; Kubo, Y.; San-
chez, Y.; Ogura, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1749.
9. Suresh, C. T.; Leena, S.; Sari, M.; Risto, S. J. Med. Food
1999, 2, 235.
10. Wang, C. F.; Kurzer, M. S. Nutr. Cancer 1998, 31, 90.
11. Larget, R.; Lockhart, B.; Renard, P.; Largeron, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 835.
12. Comte, G.; Daskiewicz, J. B.; Bayet, C.; Conseil, G.;
Viornery-Vanier, A.; Dumontet, C.; Pietro, A.; Barron, D. J.
Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 763.
13. Singh, R. P.; Shreeve, J. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7613.
14. (a) Qing, F. L.; Fan, J.; Sun, H.; Yue, X. J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3053. (b) Chen, Q. Y.; Wu, S. W. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 705.
Compd
SGC-7901 (IC50 mM )
HT-29 (IC50 mM )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5.8
3.7
2.2
5.9
4.5
3.6
4.2
8.6
2.9
5.1
2.5
2.8
6.4
3.1
2.0
2.6
2.3
2.6
3.8
3.0
2.9
4.4
4.0
1.9
2.3
2.3
9
10
11
12
13