Organic Letters
Letter
a
Mechanistically, the difunctionalization of styrenes involves
either transition-metal catalysis or radical-mediated pro-
cesses,15,16 of which the later one concerning visible light
photoredox catalysis via single electron transfer is more
captivating. Photoredox catalysis has recently stimulated
organic chemists to ensure sustainable, facile, and rapid entry
to the valued products under mild conditions.17,18 Visible-light
activation of traditional substrates to reactive intermediates at
room temperature has influenced various functionalization
reactions that otherwise require high energy influx. Another
striking change manifests the use of organic photoredox
catalysts as an alternative to transition metal (Ru and Ir) based
photocatalysts due to its low cost, high solubility, and eco-
safety.19
In view of the above and considering the importance of
multicomponent reactions (MCRs),20 we report herein an
efficient visible-light-promoted synthesis of β-keto dithiocarba-
mates by the MCR of styrenes, carbon disulfide, and secondary
amines in the presence of rhodamine B base as organic
photoredox catalyst under open air atmosphere at room
temperature (cf. Scheme 1, Present work).
To comprehend our idea to achieve the synthesis of β-keto
dithiocarbamates, an archetypal reaction employing styrene
(1a), carbon disulfide (2), and pyrrolidine (3a) was studied in
detail. To begin, the reactants 1a, 2, and 3a were irradiated
with blue LED (470 nm) as the visible light source in the
presence of eosin Y (5 mol %) as photocatalyst and K2S2O8 as
oxidant in dimethylformamide (DMF), which gave rise to the
desired product 2-oxo-2-phenylethylpyrrolidine-1-carbodi-
thioate 4a in 30% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Prompted by this
initial observation, the model reaction was thoroughly
optimized by varying different parameters such as visible-
light source, photocatalyst, oxidant, and solvent (Table 1). The
use of other photocatalysts like rose bengal and rhodamine B
base improved the product yield to 58 and 70% respectively
(Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Markedly, the reaction offered 15%
product yield in the absence of the photocatalyst, no product
without oxidant, and just 5% yield without LED source and
photocatalyst (Table 1, entries 4−6). The use of white LED
and green LED (530 nm) also remained inferior (entries 7 and
8). The proficiency of other oxidants such as aq TBHP, DTBP,
and Na2S2O8 was also examined (entries 9−11), of which aq
TBHP enhanced the product yield significantly (78%, entry 9).
The effect of aq TBHP concentration was thereafter
scrutinized, which revealed no further improvement in product
yield with 3 equiv of aq TBHP, while use of 1 equiv of aq
TBHP reduced the yield to 51%. As regards the effect of other
solvents viz. CH3CN, DMSO, DMA, toluene, ethanol, DCE,
and DMF−water mixture (3:1) on the reaction (entries 12−
18), none of them could surpass the value of DMF (entry 9).
Keeping all other parameters of entry 9 as such, the
photocatalyst concentration was then examined, which
disclosed 3 mol % as optimum and entry 19 as the best fit.
The scope and versatility of the reaction were subsequently
examined under the established conditions (Scheme 2). A
diverse array of styrenes containing electron-donating groups
such as Me, tBu, Ph, and MeO, as well as electron-withdrawing
groups such as F, Cl, Br, and CH3COO, participated nicely
with CS2 and amines under the optimized conditions to afford
the predictable products 4a−4ae in moderate to good yields.
Notably 2-vinylnaphthalene also worked well to afford the
dithiocarbamates 4r and 4s. A sterically hindered 2,4,6-
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
b
yield
(%)
entry photocatalyst
oxidant
light
solvent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
eosin Y
rose bengal
rhodamine B
K2S2O8
K2S2O8
K2S2O8
K2S2O8
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
30
58
70
15
0
rhodamine B
K2S2O8
K2S2O8
K2S2O8
TBHP
DTBP
Na2S2O8
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
5
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
rhodamine B
white DMF
green DMF
25
52
78
72
0
45
68
71
42
10
5
9
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
blue
DMF
DMF
DMF
CH3CN
DMSO
DMA
toluene
ethanol
DCE
DMF/water
(3:1)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
trace
c
19
20
rhodamine B TBHP
rhodamine B TBHP
blue
blue
DMF
DMF
78
70
d
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), 2 (2.4 mmol), 3a (1.2 mmol),
photocatalyst (5 mol %), oxidant (2 equiv), solvent (2 mL), rt, 36 h.
Isolated yield after column chromatography. Photocatalyst (3 mol
%). Photocatalyst (2 mol %). Blue (470 nm) and green LEDs (530
nm) were used for irradiation.
b
c
d
trimethylstyrene also delivered the desired product 4t in
good yield.
As regards amines, a variety of secondary amines viz.
pyrrolidine, morpholine, piperidine, dimethylamine, diethyl-
amine, dipropylamine, dibutylamine, dicyclohexylamine, tert-
butyl piperazine-1-carboxylate (1-Boc-piperazine), N-methyl-
aniline, and N-methyl-1-phenylmethanamine reacted effec-
tively with different styrenes to give the corresponding
dithiocarbamates 4. Markedly, the diminished yield of the
product 4ae (36%) is due to the lower solubility of the
resulting dithiocarbamic acid formed by N-Boc piperazine with
carbon disulfide during the course of reaction. However, the
reaction of other alkenes like stilbene, 4-bromobutene,
cyclohexene, allyl alcohol, and N-allylphthalimide, as well as
amines like n-butylamine, 2-phenylethylamine, aniline, 2-
aminopyridine, and diphenylamine, remained futile under the
stipulated conditions.
4-Nitrostyrene and 2-vinylpyridine brought about the
formation of alkylated dithiocarbamates rather than the
expected β-keto dithiocarbamates, even without using photo-
redox catalysis/TBHP. To ascertain the likeliness of this mode
of reaction, some more alkylated dithiocarbamates 5a−5f have
also been prepared (Scheme 3).
All of the products have been fully characterized based on
their NMR (1H, 13C, and 19F) and HRMS (SI). The structure
of a representative product 4j is conclusively confirmed by the
single-crystal studies (Figure 2, CCDC 2061891).
4148
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4147−4151