712
A. Palani et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 709–712
overall profile, several 2-substituted 4,6-dimethyl 5-pyr-
imidine carboxylic acid derivatives were prepared. Small
alkyl groups at the 2-position of pyrimidine are toler-
ated. For example, compounds with methyl (17a), tri-
fluoromethyl (17b), methoxy (17h) substituents
exhibited good CCR5 binding affinity. 2-Amino sub-
stitution as in 17c was also acceptable, but amido
and sulfonamido pyrimidines (17d, 17e) were found to
be less active. Clearly, analogues with substitution at
the 2-position provided no improvement in overall
pharmacokinetic profile.
References and Notes
1. (a) Littman, D. R. Cell 1998, 93, 677. (b) Murphy, P. M.
Nat. Immun. 2001, 2, 116. (c) Hunt, S. W., III; LaRosa, G. J.
Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 1998, 33, 263. (d) Saunders, J.; Tarby,
C. M. Drug Discov. Today 1999, 4, 80.
2. Berger, E. A.; Murphy, P. M.; Farber, J. M. Annu. Rev.
Immunol. 1999, 17, 657.
3. (a) Cocchi, F.; DeVico, A. L.; Garzino-Demo, A.; Arya,
S. K.; Gallo, R. C.; Lusso, P. Science 1995, 270, 1811. (b)
Michael, N. L.; Moore, J. P. Nature Med. 1999, 5, 740.
4. (a) Samson, M.; Libert, F.; Doranz, B. J.; Rucker, J.; Lies-
nard, C.; Farber, C.-M.; Saragosti, S.; Lapoumeroulle, C.;
Cognaux, J.; Forceille, C.; Muyldermans, G.; Vehofstede, C.;
Butonboy, G.; Georges, M.; Imai, T.; Rana, S.; Yi, Y.; Smyth,
R. J.; Collman, R. G.; Doms, R. W.; Vassart, G.; Parmentier,
M. Nature 1996, 382, 722. (b) Liu, R.; Paxton, W. A.; Choe,
S.; Ceradini, D.; Martin, S. R.; Horuk, R.; MacDonald, M. E.;
Stuhlmann, H.; Koup, R. A.; Landau, N. R. Cell 1996, 86,
367.
The inhibition of binding at the CCR5 receptor corre-
lated well with inhibition of viral entry for both pyr-
imidine and isonicotinic N-oxide analogues of 1. In both
series, in general methoxime analogues are less potent in
the RANTES binding assay than the ethoximes. In
addition, all compounds with ADA viral entry data lis-
ted (Table 2 and 3) inhibited the entry of HIV-1 isolate
YU-2 in U-87 cells with IC50 values less than 1 nM.
Furthermore, compounds 16a and 16b inhibited the
replication of a primary HIV-1 isolate (US-1) in PBMCs
with IC50 values comparable to that of antagonist 1
(IC50=2.6 nM for 16a).7b,7c Despite meeting all the cri-
teria for a possible preclinical candidate, the potential
liability of 16a was a lack of consistent antiviral activity
against a wide range of genetically diverse HIV-1 iso-
lates, relative to antagonist 1.
5. Michael, N. L.; Chang, G.; Louie, L. G.; Mascola, J. R.;
Dondero, D.; Birx, D. L.; Sheppard, H. W. Nature Med. 1997,
3, 338.
6. (a) Mastrolorenzo, A.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. J.
Enz. Inh. and Med. Chem. 2002, 17, 69. (b) Mastrolorenzo, A.;
Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C. T. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents
2001, 11, 1245 and references sited therein.
7. (a) Baroudy, B. AIDS—14th International Conference
(Part I), New Drugs, New Targets Symposium, Barcelona,
Spain, July 7–12, 2002 (b) Palani, A.; Shapiro, S.; Josien, H.;
Bara, T.; Clader, J. W.; Greenlee, W. J.; Cox, K.; Strizki, J.;
Enders, M.; Baroudy, B. M. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3143. (c)
Strizki, J. M.; Xu, S.; Wagner, N. E.; Wojcik, L.; Liu, J.; Hou,
Y.; Endres, M.; Palani, A.; Shapiro, S.; Clader, J. W.; Green-
lee, W. J.; Tagat, J. R.; McCombie, S.; Cox, K.; Fawzi, A. B.;
Chou, C. C.; Pugliese-Sivo, C.; Davies, L.; Moreno, M. E.;
Ho, D. D.; Trkola, A.; Stoddart, C. A.; Moore, J. P.; Reyes,
G. R.; Baroudy, B. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98,
12718.
8. A preliminary account on the synthesis of heteroaryl car-
boxylic acids and their derivatives has been presented:
McCombie, S.; Vice, S.; Tagat, J.; Lin, S, Palani, A.; Neus-
tadt, Baroudy, B.; Strizki, J.; Enders, M.; Cox, K.; Dan, N.;
Chou, C. 224th National ACS Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 7–
11, 2002; MEDI-159.
In summary, we have described the results of our SAR
investigation of the right-hand side nicotinamide N-
oxide moiety in the lead antagonist 1. Symmetrical pyr-
imidines, 2-substituted pyrimidines and 2,6-dis-
ubstituted isonicotinamides and their corresponding N-
oxides are all well tolerated, providing potent CCR5
receptor antagonists with comparable efficacy in both
binding and viral entry assays to our lead antagonist 1,
while reducing the number of rotational isomers. Our
continuing efforts to improve the overall profile of these
compounds will be published in due course.
9. (a) Gosl, R.; Meuwsen, A. Ber. 1959, 92, 2521. (b) Oka-
moto, T.; Hirobe, M.; Ohsawa, A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1966,
14, 518.
10. Gu, Y. G.; Bayburt, E. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2565.
11. (a) Rathke, M. W.; Cowan, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
2622. (b) Kress, T. J. Heterocycles 1994, 38, 1380.
12. Cox, K. A.; Dunn-Meynell, K.; Korfmacher, W. A.;
Broske, L.; Nomeir, A. A.; Lin, C. C.; Cayen, M. N.; Barr,
W. H. Drug Discov. Today 1999, 4, 232.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Jayaram Tagat, Michael Miller and
Bernard Neustadt for many useful discussions. Drs.
Ashit Ganguly, John Piwinski and Gregory Reyes are
acknowledged for their support and encouragement.