Scheme 1a
a Reagents and conditions (yield): (i) (a) NaH, THF, 0 °C; (b) 1-bromobutane, ∆ (84%). (ii) NBS, CH3CO2H (66%). (iii) (a) nBuLi,
THF, -78 °C, 90 min; (b) Me3SnCl (91%). (iv) (a) nBuLi, THF, -78 °C, 2 h; (b) ClP(O)(OEt)2 (63%). (v) (a) LDA, THF, -78 °C, 90
min; (b) Me3SnCl (89%). (vi) 1,9-Dibromononane, K2CO3, 18C6, THF, ∆, 3 days (89%). (vii) NBS, DMF, CHCl3 (8, 95%; 10, 96%; 12,
81%). (viii) PdCl2(PPh3)2, DMF, THF, ∆ (9, 68%; 11, 70%; 13, 34%; 14, 10%).
nanocrystals are necessary to allow an efficient displacement
of this insulating organic layer. Inspired by metal-ligand
coordination chemistry, several groups have begun investi-
gating the use of dithiol5 or diazaperylene6 surfactants,
expecting a chelate effect to favor the surfactant-CdSe
interaction. We have now designed a bidentate ligand
composed of two tethered oligothiophenes, each containing
one binding group. This molecular architecture is expected
to facilitate binding to and organization around the nano-
crystal. In particular, we expect favorable effects from the
intramolecular π-stacking interaction between the two oligo-
thiophene units of the bidentate molecule. The new design
of thiophene-based electroactive surfactants links two oligo-
thiophene backbones containing at least five thiophene units
by a bridge located at one R-extremity of each oligothiophene
moiety. Binding groups with a strong affinity for CdSe
nanoparticles are then introduced at the other R-extremities,
in direct conjugation with the oligothiophene moieties.
Finally, the solubility of the entire assembly is adjusted by
introducing one or more substituents on the oligothiophene
backbone.
Taking into account all these design features, compound
13 was selected as our first target (Scheme 1). A long (C9)
alkyl chain was chosen for the bridge as it adds both
solubility and flexibility to the molecule. The ester group at
the R-position not only plays the role of a linker to the bridge,
but also acts as a protecting group at this position, allowing
the oligomer chain to grow exclusively from the other
R-position.7 The other R-extremity was functionalized
with a diethylphosphonate group, useful in its own right
but also a potential precursor of the strongly binding
phosphonic acid moiety.8 Finally, instead of the alkyl chains
commonly chosen for solubility,2 we substituted alkoxy
chains since their higher polarity facilitated chromatographic
purification.
Our synthetic approach relies upon the synthesis of three
building blocks: the bridged bis(bithiophene) (Scheme 1,
7), the â-substituted monothiophene (1), and the bithiophene
bearing the diethylphosphonate at one of its R-positions (4).
(4) (a) Peng, X.; Wickham, J.; Alivisatos, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 5343. (b) Manna, L.; Scher, E. C.; Alivisatos, A. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 12700.
(5) (a) Mattoussi, H.; Mauro, J. M.; Goldman, E. R.; Anderson, G. P.;
Sundar, V. C.; Mikulec, F. V.; Bawendi, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 12142-50. (b) Pathak, S.; Choi, S.-Y.; Arnheim, N.; Thompson, M.
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 410. (c) Aldana, J.; Wang, Y. A.; Peng,
X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8844.
(7) (a) Malenfant, P. R. L.; Groenendaal, L.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10990. (b) Kirschbaum, T.; Azumi, R.; Mena-
Osteritz, E.; Ba¨uerle, P. New J. Chem. 1999, 241.
(6) Schmelz, O.; Mews, A.; Basche´, T.; Herrmann, A.; Mu¨llen, K.
Langmuir 2001, 17, 2861.
(8) McKenna, C. E.; Higa, M. T.; Cheung, N. H.; McKenna, M.-C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 2, 155.
1880
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 11, 2003