Bruno C. M. Fernandes et al.
FULL PAPERS
diluted with ether and consecutively washed with water, 1M References
hydrochloric acid, saturated sodium carbonate and brine,
dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The
product was isolated as a colourless liquid with ee >99%
according to chiral GC. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d=
2.16 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.41 (s, 1H, CH), 7.26–7.55 (m, 5H, aro-
matic); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d=20.4 (CH3), 62.8
(CH), 11.6 (CN), 127.8 (C-2,6), 129.2 (C-3,5), 130.3 (C-4),
131.7 (C-1), 168.9 (C=O).
(S)-2-Acetoxy-2-phenylacetonitrile [(S)-1e] was obtained
using a published procedure[29] with enantiomeric purity
93.7% according to chiral GC.
[1] T. Nagasawa, H. Yamada, Trends Biotechnol. 1989, 7,
153–159.
[2] R. H. Hook, W. G. Robinson, J. Biol. Chem. 1964, 239,
4263–4267.
[3] A. Goldlust, Z. Bohak, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.
1989, 11, 581–601.
[4] D. E. Stevenson, R. Feng, F. Dumas, D. Groleau, A.
Mihoc, A. C. Storer, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1992,
15, 283–302.
[5] M. Piotrowski, S. Schçnfelder, E. W. Weiler, J. Biol.
Chem. 2001, 276, 2616–2621.
[6] F. Effenberger, S. Oßwald, Tetrahedron:Asymmetry
Analysis
2001, 12, 279–285.
[7] S. Osswald, H. Wajant, F. Effenberger, Eur. J. Biochem.
2002, 269, 680–687.
[8] ꢁ. Dufour, A. C. Storer, R. Mꢂnard, Biochemistry 1995,
34, 16382–16388.
[9] C. Kiziak, D. Conradt, A. Stolz, R. Mattes, J. Klein, Mi-
crobiology 2005, 151, 3639–3648.
[10] Electron-deficiency in esters is known to increase their
reactivity towards lipases, which likewise act via gener-
al base catalysis.
[11] M. Breuer, K. Ditrich, T. Habicher, B. Hauer, M. Keß-
eler, R. Stürmer, T. Zelinski, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 788–824.
[12] K. Yamamoto, K. Oishi, I. Fujimatsu, K.-I. Komatsu,
Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 3028–3032.
[13] M. Schmidt, H Griengl, Top. Curr. Chem. 1999, 200,
193–226.
[14] a) N. Layh, A. Stolz, S. Fçrster, F. Effenberger, H.-J.
Knackmuss, Arch. Microbiol. 1992, 158, 405–411; b) U.
Heinemann, C. Kiziak, S. Zibek, N. Layh, M. Schmidt,
H. Griengl, A. Stolz, Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003,
63, 274–281.
[15] C. Brenner, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 775–782.
[16] D. B. Harper, Biochem. J. 1977, 165, 309–319.
[17] H. C. Pace, S. C. Hodawadekar, A. Draganescu, J.
Huang, P. Bieganowski, Y. Perkarsky, C. M. Croce, C.
Brenner, Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 907–917.
[18] D. Kumaran, S. Eswaramoorthy, S. E. Gerchman, H.
Kycia, F. W. Studier, S. Swaminathan, Proteins 2003, 52,
283–291.
[19] a) T. Nakai, T. Hasegawa, E. Yamashita, M. Yamamo-
to, T. Kumasaka, T. Ueki, H. Nanba, Y. Ikenaka, S. Ta-
kahashi, M. Sato, T, Tsukihara, Structure 2000, 8,
729–739; b) W.-C. Wang, W.-H. Hsu, F.-T. Chien, C-Y.
Chen, J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 306, 251–261.
Conversions and yields were determined by reversed phase
HPLC analysis, using a Waters 590 pump, a 504.6 mm
Merck Chromolith SpeedROD RP-18e column and
a
Waters 486 UV detector. Mobile phase ACN-H2O-TFA
10:90:0.1 (1a–3a), 20:80:0.1 (1b–e–3b–e) at 1 mLminÀ1.
Enantiomeric purities were determined by chiral HPLC,
using a Waters 510 pump, a 4.6250 mm Chiracel AD-H
column and a Waters 486 UV detector. Mobile phase
hexane-isopropyl alcohol-TFA=95:5:0.1 (2c, 3c) or 92:8:0.1
(2e, 3e).
Chiral GC of 1c and 1e was performed with a Shimadzu
GC-17 A instrument equipped with a Shimadzu Auto Injec-
tor AOC-20i, a 25 m0.25 mm Varian CP-Chirasil-Dex CB
column and an FID detector. Column temperature: 1408C
(1c), 1458C (1e).
Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Enzymatic hydrolysis of nitriles (1a–e) was carried out at 1–
2 mL scale in magnetically stirred Eppendorf tubes im-
mersed in a water-bath at the desired temperature. Stock
solutions of the substrate and internal standard (in metha-
nol), PfNLase and buffer (in water) were used. Final con-
centrations were 10 mM of substrate, 1 mM internal stan-
dard, 10% methanol and 100 mM phosphate buffer at the
desired pH.
The reaction was started by the addition of the enzyme
solution (all enzyme weights refer to the total protein con-
tent). Samples were taken periodically, diluted with acid (to
stop the reaction) and filtered over a Microcon YM-10 cen-
trifugal filter device prior to analysis. Samples for chiral
analysis were further extracted with ether and dried over
MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated and residue was redis-
solved in the appropriate solvent.
Reported Ac/Am ratios were measured when these had
stabilised and stayed constant until full conversion.
[20] R. K. Chaturvedi, A. E. MacMahon, G. L. Schmir, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6984–6993.
[21] C. Zervos, E. H. Cordes, J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 1661–
1667.
Acknowledgements
[22] M. Winkler, A. Glieder, N. Klempier, Chem. Commun.
2006, 1298–1300.
Thanks are due to Prof. N. Klempier (TU Graz) and Dr. G.
Huisman (Codexis, Inc.) for discussions. This work was sup-
ported by the Spanish CICYT (project PPQ 2002–01231), by
a Ramon y Cajal Contract from M.E. y C. (Spain) and by
COST D25/0002/02. Financial support to B.C.M. Fernandes
by Codexis, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
[23] Dithiothreitol-catalyzed amide formation[22] may have
increased the confusion in the past. The enzyme prepa-
ration that we used did not contain dithiothreitol.
[24] H. C. Pace, C. Brenner, Genome Biology 2001, 2, 1–9;
2/1/reviews/0001].
2602
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2597 – 2603