Lobatamide C
A R T I C L E S
(5),39 related transformations provided the desired enamides 6
and 7 (entries 3 and 4). The coupling reaction was also
successful for secondary amides. Amidations of 1 and 5 with
N-methylformamide provided enamides 8 and 9 as a mixture
of rotamers in good yields (entries 5 and 6). With 2-pyrrolidi-
none, enamide 1020a was obtained in 99% yield (entry 7).
Amidation of a Z-vinyl iodide 1140 provided Z-enamide 12 in
only 23% yield (entry 8) likely due to competitive elimination
of the Z-vinyl iodide to the corresponding terminal alkyne under
the reaction conditions.41
Figure 2. Stereoselective C-N bond construction for enamide synthesis.
Scheme 1 a
To investigate the nature of the halogen substituent, we
evaluated (E)-1-bromo-1-heptene (13)42 and (3Z)-(4-bromo-3-
butenyl)benzene43 in coupling reactions with benzamide. How-
ever, only trace amounts of enamide products were obtained in
these experiments. To compare the reactivities of vinyl iodides
and vinyl bromides in the C-N bond formation, we conducted
the competition experiment depicted in Scheme 2. Cu-mediated
amidation was performed with vinyl bromide 13, (E)-1-iodo-
1-pentene (14),34 and benzamide in NMP (90 °C). In this case,
a 7:1 ratio of enamides 15 and 2 was detected by HPLC44
analysis of the crude reaction mixture, which further supports
that vinyl bromides are significantly less reactive than vinyl
iodides as amidation substrates.45
a Reagents and conditions: (a) CuI (0.10 equiv), Cs2CO3 (1.2 equiv),
PPh3 (0.20 equiv), NMP, 90 °C, 12 h, 31% (1H NMR); (b) CuTC (0.10
equiv), Cs2CO3 (1.2 equiv), NMP, 90 °C, 12 h, 59% (1H NMR).
E and Z enamides. This is significant since many of the existing
approaches to prepare enamides are not stereoselective. As an
entry to our studies, we were attracted to a study by Ogawa et
al. who reported the copper iodide-promoted substitution of vinyl
bromides and potassium amides (1 equiv of CuI, HMPA, 130
°C) to afford enamides in low to moderate (38-45%) yields.31
On the basis of this precedent and related Cu(I)-catalyzed C-N
cross coupling reactions,32 we focused on developing a Cu(I)-
catalyzed amidation method that would occur at milder tem-
peratures and would be suitable for the installation of potentially
labile enamides on complex substrates.33
Using benzamide and (E)-1-iodo-1-heptene (1)34 as model
substrates, we initially compared Cu(I) phosphine35 and Cu(I)
carboxylate catalysts with Cs2CO3 as base (Scheme 1). We
obtained a higher conversion (59%) for enamide 2 using
Liebeskind’s Cu(I) thiophenecarboxylate (CuTC),36 which led
us to undertake further optimization with this catalyst.
To prepare enamides related to the lobatamides and related
salicylate natural products, we next prepared 4-(methoxyimino)-
2-butenamides 16 and 17 (Scheme 3). Treatment of 5-hydoxy-
2(5H)-furanone46 with aqueous methoxyamine hydrochloride led
to the formation of 4-(methoxyimino)-(2Z)-butenoic acid 18
(92%).47 The corresponding 4-(methoxyimino)-(2Z)-butenamide
16 was prepared in 88% yield by formation of the mixed
anhydride of 18 and subsequent reaction with aqueous ammonia.
(2Z)-Butenamide 16 could be fully isomerized to (2E)-buten-
amide 17 in 81% yield under acidic conditions.
Next, we conducted model amidation reactions with buten-
amides 16 and 17 and representative vinyl iodides (Table 2).
Treatment of (2E)-butenamide 17 with vinyl iodide 1 or 5 using
N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) as solvent afforded unsaturated
enamides 19 and 20 in 57% and 52% yield, respectively (entries
1 and 2). However, cross-coupling of (2Z)-butenamide 16 with
vinyl iodide 1 under similar conditions (90 °C, 12 h) did not
afford the desired enamide 21. In an effort to improve this
reaction, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedione48 was used as
After reaction optimization, optimal conditions for amidations
were discovered by employing CuTC (30 mol %), Cs2CO3 as
base, and rigorous vacuum purge degassing of the reaction
mixture in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) prior to heating (90
°C, 12 h). Using these conditions, a number of enamides were
prepared as shown in Table 1. Both benzamide and (E,E)-2,4-
hexadienamide (3) 37 participated in vinylic substitution of 1 to
afford enamides 2 and 4 in good yields (entries 1 and 2). It
should be mentioned that, under the same conditions using an
excess of vinyl iodide 1 (2.2 equiv) and Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv),
the coupling reaction with benzamide afforded only enamide 2
(77%) and recovered vinyl iodide 1 (70%) without any evidence
of an N,N-divinyl amide product.38 Using (E)-â-iodostyrene
(38) N,N-Divinylureas and N,N-divinylamides have been previously prepared
by isomerization of N,N-diallylic ureas and amides, see: (a) Murai, T.;
Kasai, Y.; Ishihara, H.; Kato, S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5542. (b)
Krompiec, S.; Suwinski, J.; Grobelny, J.; Wagner, P. Pol. J. Chem. 1997,
71, 747.
(39) Takai, K.; Ichiguchi, T.; Hikasa, S. Synlett 1999, 1268.
(40) Prepared according to: Stork, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
2173.
(31) Ogawa, T.; Kiji, T.; Hayami, K.; Suzuki, H. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1443.
(32) (a) Kiyomori, A.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Doye, S.; Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 2657. For recent studies on Cu(I)-catalyzed C-N bond
formation, see: (b) Wolter, M.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 3803. (c) Kwong, F. Y.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 581. (d) Klapars, A.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 7421. (e) Antilla, J. C.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11684. (f) Job, G. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3703. (g) Kwong, F. Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
793.
(41) In a control experiment, 4-phenyl-1-butyne was formed when 11 (1.0 equiv)-
was heated with Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv) in NMP (60 °C, 14 h).
(42) Brown, H. C.; Larock, R. C.; Gupta, S. K.; Rajagopalan, S.; Bhat, N. G. J.
Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 6079.
(43) Uenishi, J.; Kawahama, R.; Shiga, Y.; Yonemitsu, O.; Tsuji, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 6759.
(44) HPLC analysis was performed using a Waters 2700/600 HPLC system:
Symmetry C18 column (19 × 50 mm), λ ) 269 nm; 40-100% CH3CN/
H2O, 10 min; tR(15) ) 5.06 min, tR(2) ) 6.82 min.
(45) For recent reports concerning the relative reactivity of bromo and iodo
substrates in Cu(I)-catalyzed couplings, see: (a) Klapars, A.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14844. (b) Zanon, J.; Klapars, A.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2890.
(46) Doerr, I. L.; Willette, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3878.
(47) Schroeter, S. H.; Appel, R.; Brammer, R.; Schenck, G. O. Justus Liebigs
Ann. Chem. 1966, 697, 42.
(48) Buck, E.; Song, Z. J.; Tschaen, D.; Dormer, P. G.; Volante, R. P.; Reider,
P. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1623.
(33) For a preliminary account of Cu(I)-catalyzed enamide formation, see: Shen,
R.; Porco, J. A., Jr. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1333.
(34) Zweifel, G.; Whitney, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2753.
(35) Okuro, K.; Furuune, M.; Enna, M.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 4716.
(36) (a) Allred, G. D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2748.
(b) Zhang, S.; Zhang, D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2312.
(37) Pellegata, R.; Italia, A.; Villa, M. Synthesis 1985, 517.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 26, 2003 7891