52 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2013
Table 2 Amberlyst A-26 catalysed synthesis of α-hydroxy-arylacetic acidsa
Entry
Reactant
Product
Yieldb/%
M.p./°C
1
2
PhCOCH3
PhCH(OH)COOH
4-ClC6H4CH(OH)COOH
95, 94, 93, 93c
120–122 (lit.10 120–122)
118–120 (115–121)d
4-ClC6H4COCH3
92
89
90
85
88
82
81
81
80
70
3
3-ClC6H4COCH3
2-ClC6H4COCH3
3-ClC6H4CH(OH)COOH
112–114 (lit.10 112–114)
78–80 (lit.11 78–80)
4
2-ClC6H4CH(OH)COOH
5
2-BrC6H4COCH3
4-BrC6H4COCH3
4-CH3C6H4COCH3
3,4-(CH3)2C6H3COCH3
2,4-(CH3)2C6H3COCH3
2-Acetonaphthone
2-Acetylthiopene
2-BrC6H4CH(OH)COOH
178–180 (lit.11 179–180)
114–116 (lit.10 114–116)
120–122 (lit.10 120–122)
126–128 (lit.11 126–128)
120–122 (lit.11 120–122)
124 (lit.10 125–126)
6
4-BrC6H4CH(OH)COOH
7
4-CH3C6H4CH(OH)COOH
3,4-CH3C6H3CH(OH)COOH
2,4-CH3C6H3CH(OH)COOH
Hydroxy(2-naphthyl)acetic acid
Hydroxy(thien-2-yl)acetic acid
8
9
10
11
92–94 (lit.11 92–94)
a The reaction condition: Amberlyst A-26 (1 g), aryl methyl ketone (10 mmol), 1,4-dioxane (3 mL), H2O (1 mL), SeO2 (20 mmol), 90 °C,
24 h.
b Isolated yield.
c Recycled results.
d Across organics.
The solid phase containing the catalyst Amberlyst A-26 and sele-
nium powder, which had been separated by filtration, could be treated
with dilute nitric acid (50 mL, 1 M) to remove selenium powder. The
Amberlyst A-26, which remained, could then be washed with dilute
hydrochloric acid (50 mL, 1 M) and reused in the reaction.
In conclusion, Amberlyst A-26 is an efficient and reusable
heterogeneous catalyst for preparation of α-hydroxy-arylacetic
acids. The catalyst can be separated by simple filtration and the
reaction can be repeated many times.
Experimental
Received 30 August 2012; accepted 27 November 2012
Paper 1201492 doi: 10.3184/174751912X13551435784584
Published online: 15 January 2013
Chemicals used were obtained from commercial suppliers and used
without further purification. IR spectra were recorded on a Bomem
MB154S IR analyser. H NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker
1
Advance RX500 spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on a
Saturn 2000GC/MS instrument.
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
O. Miersch, R. Kramell, B. Parthier and C. Wasternack, Phytochemistry,
1999, 50, 353.
J.R.E. Hoover, G.L. Dunn, D.R. Jakas, L.L. Lam, J.J. Taggart, J.R. Guarini
and L. Phillips, J. Med. Chem., 1974, 17, 34.
T. Nishihata, H. Takahagi, M. Yamamoto, M. Tomida, J.H. Rytting and
T. Higuchi, J. Pharm. Sci., 1984, 73, 109.
M. Yoshioka, A. Yoshida, Y. Ichihashi and H. Saito, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,
1985, 33, 2145.
A.E. El Nimr, H.A. Salama, R.M. Khalil and M.A. Kassem, Pharmazie,
1983, 38, 728.
B.B. Corson, Orgnanic Synthesis, vol. I, John Wiley, New York, 1941,
p. 336.
A. Merz, Synthesis, 1974, 724.
J.G. Aston, Orgnanic synthesis, vol. III, John Wiley, New York, 1955,
p. 538.
S. Ichihashi and S. Tano, Patent, JP 2004 269, 451.
CAUTION: SeO2 and selenium are very toxic and dangerous for
the environment. Due precautions should be taken.
Typical procedure for preparation of α-hydroxy-arylacetic acids: A
mixture of Amberlyst A-26 (1 g), the aryl methyl ketone (10 mmol),
1,4-dioxane (3 mL), H2O (1 mL) and SeO2 (20 mmol) was stirred at
90 °C for 24 h. Then the mixture was cooled to room temperature. The
solid phase containing the Amberlyst A-26 and selenium powder was
filtered off, the filtrate was filtered again through a short pad of celite
in order to immobilise the unreacted SeO2. The filtrate was diluted
with 1% aq. NaOH (10 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL).
The aqueous solution was acidified to pH 1 with 10% aq. HCl and
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phases
were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and a yellowish crude product was obtained. The
crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
column to give a white crystalline (eluent: CH2Cl2/MeOH = 90/10).
All of the products are known compounds and were characterised by
comparison of their spectroscopic data with those of authentic sam-
ples. Selected data for mandelic acid (Table 2, entry 1): 95% yield.
White solid; m.p. 120–122 °C; IR (KBr): ν 3400 (OH), 1714 (C=O)
cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, TMS, CDCl3) δ 5.27 (s, 1H, –CH), δ 7.37–
7.48 (m, 5H, –Ar), –OH resonances were broad and weak; 13C NMR
(75MHz): δ =71.6, 125.6, 127.8, 127.9, 136.5, 175.8; MS (EI) m/z 152
(M+).
7
8
9
10 M. Curini, F. Epifano, S. Genovese, M.C. Marcotullio and O. Rosati, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 1331.
11 M.G. Shen and C. Cai, Cata. Commun., 2007, 8, 871.
12 B.M.L. Dioos, I.F.J. Vankelecom and P.A. Jacobs, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006,
348, 1413.
13 P.W. Zheng and W.Q. Zhang, J. Catal. 2007, 250, 324.
14 T.K. Santosh, P. Thirupathi and S.S. Kim, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 10383.
15 S.K. Ko and C.F. Yao, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 8827.
16 K.S. Kumar, J. Iqbal and M. Pal, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 6244.
17 Y.H. Liu, Q.S. Liu and Z.H. Zhang, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2008, 296, 42.
18 M. Tajbakhsh,A. Heydari, M.A. Khalilzadeh, M.M. Lakouraj, B. Zamenian
and S. Khaksar, Synlett, 2007, 2347.
19 M.A. Chari, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 6108.
20 R. Ballini, P. Marziali and A. Mozzicafreddo, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
3209.