organic compounds
OÐHÁ Á ÁN hydrogen bonds and centred at (12, n, 0) (n = zero or
integer) (Fig. 5).
Experimental
For the synthesis of each of compounds (I)±(III), a solution of
2-chloronicotinoyl chloride (5.68 mmol), the appropriate nitroaniline
(5.78 mmol) and triethylamine (12 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydro-
furan (30 ml) was stirred at ambient temperature for 8 h; water
(20 ml) and ethyl acetate (20 ml) were added, and the organic layer
was separated. This was washed with a saturated aqueous Na(HCO3)
solution (2 Â 20 ml), dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent
removed. The resulting solids were puri®ed by chromatography on
alumina, with ethyl acetate and hexane (7:3 v/v) as eluant.
Compounds (I) and (II) were recrystallized from acetone [m.p. 430±
432 and 428±429 K (darkens at 407 K)], while compound (III) was
recrystallized from ethanol (m.p. 479±481 K).
The hydrogen-bonded chains in compound (II) are linked
by three distinct aromatic ꢀ±ꢀ stacking interactions, all of
them centrosymmetric but some of them fairly weak, into a
continuous three-dimensional array. The heteroaryl ring in the
molecule at (x, y, z) is parallel to the corresponding ring in the
molecule at ( x, 1 y, z), which itself forms part of the
hydrogen-bonded chain along ( 12, y, 0); the interplanar
Ê
spacing is 3.546 (2) A, with a ring-centroid separation of
Ê
Ê
3.795 (2) A, corresponding to a ring offset of 1.352 (2) A. This
interaction thus links the [010] chains into (001) sheets. In a
similar fashion, the aryl rings of the molecules at (x, y, z) and
(1 x, y, 1 z), where the latter forms part of the
hydrogen-bonded chain along (12, y, 1), are also parallel, with
Compound (I)
Ê
Crystal data
an interplanar spacing of 3.707 (2) A, a ring-centroid separa-
3
Ê
Ê
C12H8ClN3O3
Mr = 277.66
Dx = 1.633 Mg m
Mo Kꢂ radiation
Cell parameters from 2580
re¯ections
tion of 3.917 (2) A and a ring offset of 1.264 (2) A. Finally, the
aryl rings of the molecules at (x, y, z) and ( x, y, 1 z),
which forms part of the hydrogen-bonded chain along ( 12, y,
Monoclinic, P21=c
Ê
a = 6.9964 (1) A
ꢃ = 3.4±27.5ꢀ
ꢄ = 0.35 mm
T = 120 (2) K
Ê
Ê
b = 22.4244 (4) A
1), are also parallel, with an interplanar spacing of 3.384 (2) A,
Ê
a ring-centroid separation of 3.793 (2) A and a ring offset of
Ê
1.715 (2) A. These latter interactions connect the (001) sheets,
so linking all of the hydrogen-bonded chains into a continuous
framework.
1
Ê
c = 7.2085 (1) A
ꢁ = 93.0910 (11)ꢀ
3
Ê
V = 1129.30 (3) A
Z = 4
Block, colourless
0.54 Â 0.44 Â 0.36 mm
Data collection
The two independent molecules in (III) are linked into
simple chains by two NÐHÁ Á ÁN hydrogen bonds (Table 6).
Amide atom N21 acts as a hydrogen-bond donor to ring atom
N31 within the asymmetric unit; similarly, amide atom N41 at
(x, y, z) acts as a donor to ring atom N11 at ( 1 + x, y, z), so
generating by translation a C22(12) chain running parallel to
the [100] direction (Fig. 6). There are number of short CÐ
HÁ Á ÁO contacts within this chain (Table 6), although it is
doubtful if any of them could be regarded as a hydrogen bond;
it is likely that these contacts are simply adventitious conse-
quences of the NÐHÁ Á ÁN hydrogen bonds. Two C22(12) chains,
antiparallel to one another, pass through each unit cell, but
there are no direction-speci®c interactions between adjacent
chains.
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer
' and ! scans
2355 re¯ections with I > 2ꢅ(I)
Rint = 0.029
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
Tmin = 0.835, Tmax = 0.886
13 129 measured re¯ections
2580 independent re¯ections
ꢃmax = 27.5ꢀ
h = 9 ! 9
k = 29 ! 28
l = 9 ! 9
Re®nement
Re®nement on F2
R[F2 > 2ꢅ(F2)] = 0.038
wR(F2) = 0.104
S = 1.19
2580 re¯ections
w = 1/[ꢅ2(F2o) + (0.0562P)2
+ 0.4042P]
where P = (F2o + 2Fc2)/3
(Á/ꢅ)max = 0.001
3
Ê
Áꢆmax = 0.57 e A
Áꢆmin
3
Ê
0.47 e A
174 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
=
Extinction correction: SHELXL97
Extinction coef®cient: 0.078 (6)
It is thus striking that modest changes in the geometric
position of a single substituent are associated with signi®cant
changes in crystallization characteristics, in the direction-
speci®c intermolecular interactions manifested and hence in
the overall supramolecular structures; none of these changes is
readily predictable.
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (A, ) for (I).
ꢀ
Ê
N21ÐC21
1.4052 (17)
114.40 (12)
C22ÐN22
1.4618 (18)
127.03 (12)
N21ÐC17ÐC13
C17ÐN21ÐC21
C12ÐC13ÐC17ÐN21
C13ÐC17ÐN21ÐC21
62.93 (18)
178.88 (13)
C17ÐN21ÐC21ÐC22
C21ÐC22ÐN22ÐO2
157.61 (14)
15.1 (2)
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond parameters and short intramolecular contacts (A,
for (I).
ꢀ
Ê
)
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
DÐH
HÁ Á ÁA
DÁ Á ÁA
DÐHÁ Á ÁA
N21ÐH21Á Á ÁO2
C14ÐH14Á Á ÁO2i
C25ÐH25Á Á ÁO1ii
C26ÐH26Á Á ÁO1
0.88
0.95
0.95
0.95
2.01
2.49
2.53
2.30
2.6416 (16)
3.4084 (17)
3.2921 (18)
2.8771 (18)
128
162
137
119
Figure 6
A stereoview of part of the crystal structure of (III), showing the
formation of a C22(12) chain along [100]. For clarity, H atoms bonded to C
atoms have been omitted.
Symmetry codes: (i) x 1; y; z; (ii) x; y 1; z 1.
Acta Cryst. (2005). C61, o204±o208
ꢁ
o206 de Souza et al. Three isomers of C12H8ClN3O3