Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
settings.20−23 The Cu-mediated radiofluorination (CMRF) of
organoboron precursors is a general (in terms of substrate
scope) and practical (in terms of precursor availability and
translation to automated syntheses) radiofluorination strategy
that has been widely adopted for clinical use.24 Although many
simple arylboron reagents exhibit high benchtop stability, the
purification, storage, and/or handling of highly functionalized
(hetero)arylboron compounds (for example, those derived
from the late-stage borylation of bioactive scaffolds) as well as
of 2-azaaryl and polyfluorinated aryl boron derivatives can be
quite challenging.25
Table 1. Impact of C−H Borylation Reagents on CMRF of
a
1-BPin
entry
[Cu] (μmol)
additive (μmol)
RCY (%)
1
2
3
5
5
5
none
80 10
42 10
An attractive alternative would be to directly use C(sp2)−H
substrates as precursors for nucleophilic radiofluorination. The
(hetero)arene substrates of these transformations are excep-
tionally stable and readily available. However, there are major
challenges to realizing this approach, including (1) developing
strategies for the rapid activation/radiofluorination of tradi-
tionally inert C(sp2)−H bonds and (2) controlling the
selectivity of 18F incorporation when there are multiple
C(sp2)−H sites. Several recent reports have shown the
feasibility of C(sp2)−H radiofluorination in limited contexts
(Scheme 1B). For instance, aminoquinoline directing groups
were used to control reactivity and selectivity in ortho-selective
C(sp2)−H CMRF of (hetero)arenes.26 Additionally, para-
selective electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS) on electron
rich (hetero)arenes was employed for the in situ generation of
hypervalent iodine precursors for CMRF.27 A related para-
selective EAS reaction was leveraged to access aryl sulfonium
salts, which then undergo uncatalyzed nucleophilic radio-
fluorination.28 Finally, an organic photoredox approach was
utilized to achieve para-selective nucleophilic radiofluorination
of electron rich (hetero)arenes.29 In this report, we
demonstrate a sequential Ir/Cu-mediated C(sp2)−H radio-
fluorination with a wide substrate scope, complementary site
selectivity, and high operational simplicity compared to
existing methods (Scheme 1C). This transformation merges
the Ir-catalyzed C(sp2)−H borylation of (hetero)arenes30,31
with Cu-mediated radiofluorination to achieve meta-selective
18F-labeling of electronically diverse (hetero)arene substrates.
[Ir(COD)Cl]2 (3)
[Ir(COD)OMe]2 (3)
tmphen (6)
80
6
4
5
49 13
5
6
5
5
dtbpy (6)
TBACl (6)
58
0
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
none
tmphen (6)
dtbpy (6)
B2Pin2 (10)
92
88
91
36
43
96
83
86
1
3
3
6
9
3
5
2
HBPin (20)
n-BuOH (550)
B2Pin2 (10) and n-BuOH (550)
HBPin (10) and n-BuOH (550)
a
Unless otherwise stated, RCYs are nonisolated and are calculated by
multiplying RCC (measured via radio-TLC) by the RCP (measured
via radio-HPLC).
conversion (RCC) values obtained via radio-thin-layer
chromatography (rTLC) analysis by radiochemical purity
(RCP) values obtained via radio-high-performance liquid
chromatography (rHPLC) analysis. However, as predicted,
the addition of various C−H borylation reaction components
significantly lowers the yield of 1-18F. Iridium sources
containing chloride ligands (e.g., [Ir(COD)Cl]2, entry 2), are
particularly problematic, likely due to competing reactions of
the Cl− ion. Consistent with this proposal, the addition of 5
μmol of tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBACl, entry 6)
completely shuts down the CMRF reaction. Moving to the
halide-free Ir precursor [Ir(COD)OMe]2 restores the yield to
∼80% (entry 3).
Common ligands for Ir-catalyzed C−H borylation, 4,4′-di-
tert-butylbipyridine (dtbpy) and 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phe-
nanthroline (tmphen), also impede radiofluorination (entries
4, 5). We hypothesize that these ligate the Cu and render it less
reactive. To mitigate this issue, the Cu loading was increased
from 5 μmol (equimolar with the added ligands) to 20 μmol
(>3-fold excess relative to the dtbpy/tmphen). This change in
stoichiometry restores the radiofluorination yield to >80%
(entries 7−9). Finally, B2Pin2 and HBPin inhibit the
radiofluorination step (entries 10, 11). We hypothesized that
this could be addressed by using an alcohol additive to quench
reactive boron species.35,36 Indeed, the addition of 30 equiv of
n-BuOH37,38 renders the radiofluorination reaction insensitive
to boron additives (entries 13, 14).39
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
Although other tandem Ir C−H borylation sequences have
been reported,32 we anticipated three major challenges for
combining Ir-catalyzed C(sp2)−H borylation and Cu-mediated
radiofluorination of the resulting (hetero)aryl boronate esters.
First, CMRF reactions are well-known to be highly sensitive to
conditions (e.g., solvent, ligands, additives),33,34 thus creating
potential compatibility issues with the Ir catalysis. Second, due
to the sensitivity of the active Ir catalyst, the Ir-catalyzed
reaction is most commonly conducted with rigorous exclusion
of air and moisture, which is not feasible in standard
radiochemistry laboratories. Third, Ir-catalyzed C(sp2)−H
borylation proceeds with modest site selectivity for certain
classes of substrates, which could ultimately result in mixtures
of radiofluorinated products.
We first probed the anticipated compatibility issues by
conducting the CMRF of 1-BPin in the presence of different
components of the Ir-catalyzed C−H borylation reaction
(Table 1). Under standard radiofluorination conditions (20
μmol of 1-BPin, 0.25 equiv of Cu(py)4(OTf)2, [18F]tetrabutyl-
ammonium fluoride ([18F]TBAF) in DMA at 120 °C for 20
min), 1-18F is formed in 80% radiochemical yield (RCY; entry
1), which was measured by multiplying radiochemical
The C−H borylation step was next evaluated using the
compatible precatalyst and ligand, [Ir(COD)OMe]2/tmphen.
Initial studies focused on identifying an operationally simple
benchtop procedure, since most radiochemistry laboratories
lack specialized equipment for air-free reactions. These studies
revealed that the ligand, catalyst, and solvent for C−H
borylation can be dispensed into a vial under ambient
conditions followed by a 2 min argon sparge of the resulting
6916
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6915−6921