M.-X. Liu et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 79 (2011) 1837–1842
1841
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
protons, with the peaks shifted to ı 12.18, 11.75 and 9.87 ppm,
respectively. With the further addition of Cu2+ up to 1.0 equiv., the
peak of the thiol almost completely disappeared, and the peak of
the phenol shifted downfield and broadened. These results sug-
1-Cu2+
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
gested a possible interaction mode between the sensor 1 and Cu2+
,
in which Cu2+ coordinates with the sulfur of the thiol group and
the oxygen of the phenol group. Therefore, the color change was
observed for the sensor 1 in the presence of Cu2+ from colorless to
yellow and accounted for the appearance of the new absorbance
band at 398 nm, which were due to the coordination of Cu2+
.
0.8
0.9
1.0
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, a novel colorimetric chemosensor 1 was designed
and synthesized by coupling compound 4 with an equivalent of
an aldehyde, to form a Schiff base structure which has enhanced
intramolecular charge transfer. The sensor showed colorimetric,
selective recognition for Cu2+ in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v) solutions and
formed a stable complex with Cu2+. The excellent selectivity and
strong affinity for Cu2+ is due to the coordination of Cu2+ to the
sensor via the thiol and phenol groups. In addition, the detection
limit of the sensor 1 toward Cu2+ is 8.0 × 10−7 M which indicates
that this sensor could potentially be useful as a probe for moni-
toring Cu2+ levels in physiological and environmental systems. In
addition, the sensor also displayed a Cu2+-induced off-on-off type
of signaling pattern, which means the sensor could be used as a
supramolecular switching system.
250
300
350
400
450
500
Wavelength/nm
Fig. 7. (a) UV–vis spectra of sensor 1 Cu2+ (c = 2.0 × 10−5 M) in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v)
solution upon addition of EDTA (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 equiv.).
and Cu2+
UV–vis absorption spectral variation of sensor
1
1
,
(c = 2.0 × 10−5 M) in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v) solution was monitored
during titration with different concentrations of Cu2+ from 0 to
8.1 × 10−5 M. As shown in Fig. 6, an isosbestic point at 354 nm is
clearly observed with increasing concentrations of Cu2+, indicat-
ing that sensor 1 reacts with Cu2+ to form a stable complex. The
association constant, Ka, of sensor 1 toward Cu2+ was calculated
as 4.3 × 105 M−1 (R = 0.999). Taken together, these results illustrate
that sensor 1 is a Cu2+-specific chemosensor. Furthermore, with the
probe concentrations employed in our studies, interactions of sen-
sor 1 with Cu2+ could be detected down to at least concentrations
of 8.0 × 10−7 M in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v), showing that this sensor
could potentially be used as a probe for monitoring Cu2+ levels in
physiological and environmental systems.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NSFC (No. 21064006) and the
Natural Science Foundation of Gansu (1010RJZA018).
References
[1] V. Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, F. Foti, M. Licchelli, A. Poggi, D. Sacchi, A. Taglietti,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 250 (2006) 273–299.
[2] A.P. de Silva, H.Q.N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, Chem. Rev. 97 (1997)
1515–1566.
[3] E.L. Que, D.W. Domaille, C.J. Chang, Chem. Rev. 108 (2008) 1517–1548.
[4] E. Pontiki, D. Hadjipavlou-Litina, A.T. Chaviara, C.A. Bolos, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 16 (2006) 2234–2237.
[5] M. Schaefer, J.D. Gitlin, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 276 (1999)
311–314.
[6] R.-L. Sheng, P.-F. Wang, Y.-H. Gao, Y. Wu, W.-M. Liu, Org. Lett. 10 (2008)
5015–5018.
[7] E. Gaggelli, H. Kozlowski, D. Valensin, G. Valensin, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006)
1995–1999.
[8] A.K. Jain, R.K. Singh, S. Jain, J. Raisoni, Trans. Met. Chem. 33 (2008) 243–249.
[9] N. Singh, N. Kaur, J.F. Callan, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 3385–3387.
[10] Y.C. Hsieh, J.L. Chir, H.-H. Wu, C.-Q. Guo, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 109–111.
[11] S. Wakida, N. Sato, K. Saito, Sens. Actuators B 130 (2008) 187–192.
[12] S. Goswami, R. Chakrabarty, Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 5910–5913.
[13] G. Goretaki, P.V. Bonnesen, R. Dabestani, G.M. Brown, ACS Symp. Ser. 943 (2006)
12–33.
The reversibility of the chemosensor function was tested by
titration of the copper-sensor complex with EDTA, which is a
well-known chelator of Cu2+. Addition of EDTA into a solution of
the 1–Cu2+ complex induced the opposite trend in the absorption
spectra to that observed on titration with Cu2+. Upon addition of
1.0 equiv. of EDTA, the optical absorbance intensity returned to
the levels observed for the free compound 1 (Fig. 7). This shows
that the process of titrating sensor 1 with Cu2+ is reversible, and
chemosensor.
To further elucidate the binding mode of sensor 1 with Cu2+ 1H
,
NMR-titration spectra were measured, which illustrated the char-
acteristic structural changes occurring upon interaction with Cu2+
in DMSO-d6 solution. As shown in Fig. 8, before the addition of the
Cu2+, the 1H NMR chemical shifts of the phenol, thiol and HC N pro-
tons of sensor 1 were at ı 12.14, 11.25 and 8.84 ppm, respectively.
After the addition of 0.2 equiv. of Cu2+, significant downfield shifts
[14] A. Senthilvelan, I.T. Ho, K.-C. Chang, G.H. Lee, Y.-H. Liu, Chem. Eur. J. 15 (2009)
6152–6160.
[15] S.K. Mittal, A. Kumar, N. Gupta, S. Kaur, S. Kumar, Anal. Chim. Acta 585 (2007)
161–170.
[16] E.A. Ambundo, M.V. Deydier, L.A. Ochrymowycz, D.B. Rorabacher, Inorg. Chem.
39 (2000) 1171–1179.
were observed for the thiol proton. After adding 0.5 equiv. of Cu2+
three weak, broad signals appeared for the phenol, thiol and HC
,
N
[17] R. Martinez, A. Espinosa, A. Tarraga, P. Molina, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 5869–5872.
[18] Z.-T. Jiang, R.-R. Deng, L. Tang, Sens. Actuators B 135 (2008) 128–132.
[19] Y.-Q. Weng, F. Yue, Y.-R. Zhong, B.-H. Ye, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 7749–7755.
[20] I.S. Cho, H. Han, J.H. Shim, J.S. Lee, J.H. Shin, G.S. Cha, B.H. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett.
51 (2010) 2835–2839.
[21] S. Goswami, D. Sen, N.K. Das, Org. Lett. 12 (2010) 856–859.
[22] M.V. Selma, J.C. Espn, F.A. Tom, J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (2009) 6485–6501.
[23] K.R. Krishnapriya, D. Saravanakumar, P. Arunkumar, M. Kandaswamy, Spec-
trochim. Acta A 69 (2008) 1077–1081.
[24] A. Helal, S.H. Lee, S.H. Kim, H.S. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 3531–3535.
[25] L. Wang, W.W. Qin, X.L. Tang, W.S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. A 115 (2011) 1609–1611.
[26] Y.-M. Zhang, Q. Lin, T.-B. Wei, D.-D. Wang, H. Yao, Y.-L. Wang, Sens. Actuators
B 137 (2009) 447–455.
Fig. 8. Cu2+ 1H NMR titration of sensor 1 (10.0 mM) in DMSO-d6: (a) 1 only, (b)
1 + 0.2 equiv. of Cu2+, (c) 1 + 0.5 equiv. of Cu2+ and (d) 1 + 1.0 equiv. of Cu2+
[27] Y.-M. Zhang, J.-D. Qin, Q. Lin, T.-B. Wei, J. Fluorine Chem. 127 (2006) 1222–1227.
.