New Ver sa tile Rou te to th e Syn th esis of
Tetr a h yd r o-â-ca r bolin es a n d
Tetr a h yd r o-p yr a n o[3,4-b]in d oles via a n
In tr a m olecu la r Mich a el Ad d ition Ca ta lyzed
by In Br 3
Marianna Agnusdei, Marco Bandini,*
Alfonso Melloni, and Achille Umani-Ronchi*
F IGURE 1. Examples of C-4-substituted indolyl-based anal-
gesic agents.
Dipartimento di Chimica “G. Ciamician”, Via Selmi 2,
40126 Bologna, Italy
SCHEME 1. Use of In Br 3 in P r om otin g
F r ied el-Cr a fts Alk yla tion of In d oles
bandini@ciam.unibo.it; umani@ciam.unibo.it
Received April 13, 2003
Abstr a ct: A simple multistep synthetic strategy to 4-sub-
stituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-â-carboline and 1,3,4,9-tetrahy-
dro-pyrano[3,4-b]indole derivatives starting from commer-
cially available indole 2-carboxylic acid (5) is described. The
final intramolecular Michael addition promoted by catalytic
amount of InBr3 (5-10 mol %) provided the expected
polycyclic compounds in excellent yields (up to 97%) both in
anhydrous organic and aqueous media.
well. Also in this case, the presence of substituents in
the C-4 position is crucial to guarantee a high level of
biological activity.4,5
In this contribution, we wish to describe our prelimi-
nary findings regarding a new valuable synthetic mul-
tistep alternative for the preparation of 4-functionalized
tetrahydro-â-carbolines and their tetrahydro-pyranyl
analogues by the use of inexpensive and commercially
available indole 2-carboxylic acid 5 as the starting
material.
We are currently engaged in developing catalytic
Friedel-Crafts (FC) alkylation reactions of indoles with
electrophilic carbon synthons in the presence of low
loading of anhydrous InBr3. In particular, due to the
remarkable tolerance of indium salts toward water and
strongly coordinating functional groups,6 remarkable
findings have been obtained in the 1-4 addition of
indoles to arylcrotyl ketones,7a nitro alkenes,7b and indolyl
enones7c and in the stereoselective ring-opening reaction
of enantiomerically pure aryl epoxides (Scheme 1).7d
In light of these results, we reasoned that a valuable
way to construct the carboline skeleton could involve a
Lewis acid-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of the
appropriate ꢀ-(2′-indolyl)-R,â-unsaturated carbonyl pre-
cursor 3 (Scheme 2). To the best of our knowledge, this
kind of intramolecular ring-closing approach has never
been considered in the synthesis of polycyclic indolyl
alkaloids.
The â-carboline skeleton is frequently encountered in
pharmacology due to its activity in the CNS (central
nervous system) at serotonin receptors. In particular, it
shows prominent biological properties at the benzodi-
azepine receptor (BzR).1 Here, the specific interactions
of indolyl compounds containing the â-carboline frame-
work with BzR are strongly influenced by the presence
of substituents on the polycyclic central unit. Cook and
co-workers2 reported that the introduction of a meth-
oxymethyl arm at the C-4 position (ZK 93423, 1, Figure
1) remarkably amplifies the agonist activity of such
compounds toward BzR. Common precursors of â-carbo-
line derivatives are the 1,2,3,9-tetrahydro-â-carbolines
(THBCs) that can be easily oxidized to the aromatic
systems.2b
Although the construction of THBCs with substitution
in positions 1-3 can be conveniently accomplished by
adopting the Pictet-Spengler cyclization,1 obtaining
4-functionalized tetrahydro-â-carbolines still remains
more challenging, and multistep procedures are normally
required. In this context, Busacca and co-workers re-
cently described a useful approach for the preparation
of 4-aryl, 4-alkyl, and 4-acetyl carboline derivatives via
Pd-mediated cross-coupling of arylboronic acids and
Grignard reagents to the 4-trifloxy-â-carboline.3
It is noteworthy that, although intramolecular FC
cycloalkylations are well documented,8 they usually suffer
from moderate yields and lack of regioselectivity and
Analogously, 1,3,4,9-tetrahydro-4-functionalized-pyrano-
[3,4-b]indoles are well-known potent analgesic agents and
some 1-acetic acid derivatives, such as the pemedolac 2
(Figure 1), were tested as an antiinflammatory agent as
(4) Mobilio, D.; Humber, L. G.; Katz, A. H.; Demerson, C. A.; Hughes,
P.; Brigance, R.; Conway, K.; Shah, U.; Williams, G.; Labbadia, F.; De
Lange, B.; Asselin, A.; Schmid, J .; Newburger, J .; J ensen, N. P.;
Weichman, B. M.; Chau, T.; Neuman, G.; Wood, D. D.; Van Engen, D.;
Taylor, N. J . Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 2211.
(5) Humber, L. G. Med. Res. Rev. 1987, 7, 1.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39-051-2099509. Fax: +39-2099456.
(1) Cox, E. D.; Cook, J . M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1797.
(2) (a) Hollinshead, S. P.; Trudell, M. L.; Skolnick, P.; Cook, J . M.
J . Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1062. (b) Cox, E. D.; Diaz-Harauzo, H.; Huang,
Q.; Reddy, M. S.; Ma, C.; Harris, B.; McKernan, R.; Skolnick, P.; Cook,
J . M. J . Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2537.
(6) (a) Ranu, B. C. Eur. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 2347. (b) Chauhan, K.
K.; Frost, C. G. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3015.
(7) (a) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Giacomini, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Selva,
S.; Umani-Ronchi, A. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3700. (b) Bandini, M.;
Fagioli, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Synthesis
2002, 1110. (c) Bandini, M.; Fagioli, M.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi,
A. Synthesis 2003, 397. (d) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Melchiorre, P.;
Umani-Ronchi, A. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5386.
(3) Busacca, C. A.; Eriksson, M. C.; Dong, Y.; Prokopowicz, A. S.;
Salvagno, A. M.; Tschantz, M. A. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4564.
10.1021/jo034466m CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/09/2003
7126
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7126-7129