chemists to investigate its synthesis. The groups of Snider4
and Baldwin5 have recently synthesized in a racemic form
the originally proposed structure 1 for pyrinodemin A and
positional isomer 2 of the double bond; further, Baldwin’s
group6 has also reported the racemic synthesis of positional
isomer 3 of the double bond. Both groups concluded that
the position of the double bond in the natural product was
incorrectly assigned between C16′-C17′, mainly on the basis
of critical carbon chemical shift differences (∆δ) observed
between the olefinic carbons, |∆δ| ) 1.0 ppm (Snider), 1.1
ppm (Baldwin) in 1; |∆δ| ) 0 ppm in natural pyrinodemin
A. In light of the difference |∆δ| ) 0.4 ppm in 2, Baldwin’s
group reported that 2 does not correspond to the natural
product as well. In contrast, Snider’s group concluded that
2 is probably the correct structure of pyrinodemin A, albeit
|∆δ| ) 0.4 ppm in 2. On the other hand, Baldwin’s group
suggested the C14′-C15′ double-bond positional isomer 3
as a possible structure of pyrinodemin A because |∆δ| )
0.02 ppm in 3 is nearer to the natural |∆δ| ) 0 ppm. Thus,
there has been inconsistency with the correct structure of
natural pyrinodemin A between both groups. In this paper,
we report the racemic synthesis of possible structures 2-4
for pyrinodemin A and support the C14′-C15′ double-bond
positional isomer 3, which Baldwin’s group proposed, as the
correct structure. Furthermore, we report the first enantiose-
lective total synthesis of (-)-pyrinodemin A (3) through a
highly diastereoselective intramolecular 1,3-dipolar cycload-
dition reaction as the key step and the determination of its
absolute configuration.
Scheme 1a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran, 10-cam-
phorsulfonic acid, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h, 100%; (b) LiCtCH‚H2N-
(CH2)2NH2, NaI, DMSO, rt, 4 h, 82%; (c) 9, LDA, THF, -78 °C,
30 min, then Br(CH2)m-1Br (m ) 6, 7, 8), -78 °C to room
temperature, 12 h; (d) lithium acetylide of 8, 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-
tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone/THF (1:1), -15 °C to room tem-
perature, 16 h; (e) H2, 5% Pd-CaCO3, EtOAc, rt, 18 h; (f)
p-TsOH‚H2O, EtOH, rt, 45 min; (g) (COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2,
-78 °C to room temperature, 1 h; (h) NH2OH‚HCl, KOH, MeOH,
rt, 30 min, then HCl (pH 3), NaBH3CN, rt, 2 h; (i) 14a, toluene, rt,
40 min, then reflux, 13 h.
In comparison of the synthetic compounds 1-3 with the
natural product, the most critically discriminating point is
∆δ between the olefinic carbons. The farther the position of
the double bond is from the isoxazolidine ring, the nearer
the value of ∆δ is to zero in natural pyrinodemin A.
Therefore, we were interested in the ∆δ of compound 4,
which has the double bond one carbon farther from the
isoxazolidine ring than 3. Thus, we first embarked on the
synthesis of 4 as an alternative possible structure for
pyrinodemin A.
The preparation of hydroxylamine 15c required for the
synthesis of 4 began with THP protection of 6-bromo-1-
hexanol (6) (Scheme 1). Alkylation of the lithium acetylide
ethylenediamine complex with bromide 7 (n ) 6)7 in DMSO
containing NaI4 afforded terminal alkyne 8 (n ) 6) in 82%
yield. Coupling of the lithium acetylide of 8 (n ) 6) with
bromide 10 (m ) 6),8 prepared by alkylating a lithio
derivative of 3-picoline (9)9 with 1,5-dibromopentane, pro-
vided alkyne 11c, hydrogenation of which over Lindlar
catalyst yielded cis-alkene 12c. Deprotection of the THP
ether in 12c and Swern oxidation10 of the resulting alcohol
13c gave aldehyde 14c, which was converted into the desired
hydroxylamine 15c by reductive amination with hydroxyl-
amine and sodium cyanoborohydride in good yields. Dehy-
dration condensation of the hydroxylamine 15c and aldehyde
14a, prepared from 5-hexyn-1-ol (5) by a similar sequence
of reactions, generated a nitrone intermediate, an intramo-
lecular 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition11 of which in situ proceeded
in refluxing toluene to diastereoselectively produce the fourth
double-bond positional isomer 4 in 92% yield.4-6,12 The
synthesis of other possible double-bond positional isomers
(4) Snider, B. B.; Shi, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1639-1642.
(5) Baldwin, J. E.; Romeril, S. P.; Lee, V.; Claridge, T. D. W. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 1145-1148.
(6) Romeril, S. P.; Lee, V.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Baldwin, J. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 327-329.
(7) All new compounds reported here were satisfactorily characterized
on the basis of their 1H and 13C NMR, IR, MS, and HRMS spectra. For
selected characterization data, see Supporting Information.
(8) (a) Torisawa, Y.; Hashimoto, A.; Nakagawa, M.; Seki, H.; Hara, R.;
Hino, T. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 8067-8078. (b) Morimoto, Y.; Yokoe, C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8981-8984. (c) Morimoto, Y.; Yokoe, C.;
Kurihara, H.; Kinoshita, T. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 12197-12214.
(9) Davies-Coleman, M. T.; Faulkner, D. J.; Dubowchik, G. M.; Roth,
G. P.; Polson, C.; Fairchild, C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5925-5930.
(10) (a) Mancuso, A. J.; Huang, S.-L.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem. 1978,
43, 2480-2482. (b) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651-
1660.
(11) (a) Tufariello, J. J. In 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry; Padwa,
A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1984; Vol. 2, p 87. (b) Confalone, P. N.; Huie,
E. M. Org. React. 1988, 36, 1-173. (c) Wade, P. A. In ComprehensiVe
Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991;
Vol. 4, pp 1111-1168.
2612
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 15, 2003