A R T I C L E S
Ohyabu et al.
oxygenated precursor 8 for Overman rearrangement. In our
previous retrosynthesis toward the deoxy tetrodotoxin analogues,
a Diels-Alder cycloaddition strategy was employed for the
cyclohexene ring construction.22 An alternative strategy was
based on electrocyclization for the cyclohexene moiety.23
Besides these two basic strategies, we added the third strategy
for the synthesis of the oxygenated cyclohexane skeleton as 8
via a different route. Exoolefin 8 could be prepared from dienone
9 through a directed aldol cyclization of 10 and Claisen
rearrangement of 11 as conceptual key steps. The enone was
envisaged to derive from an intramolecular aldol condensation
of 10a; methyl ketone could be prepared by hydration of
acetylene, while the dihydroxyacetone moiety might need regio-
and stereoselective hydroxylation to the acetone moiety in 10b.
The acetone at the C-4a position would be obtainable via Claisen
rearrangement of allyl isopropenyl ether 11. The ethynyl group
would be introduced via Sonogashira coupling of 12 (X )
halogen) with an acetylene. We have accessed the readily
available 2-acetoxy-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal 13 as the chiral starting
material.
presence of potassium carbonate30 to afford 19 as the only
isolable product in high yield.
Scheme 2. Sonogashira Coupling and Claisen Rearrangement
Strategy
Synthesis of the Cyclohexane Skeleton
Synthesis started with allylic alcohol 14, readily prepared in
two steps from 2-acetoxy-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal 13 (Scheme 2).24
The primary alcohol of 14 was protected with tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl chloride (TBS-Cl) in the presence of triethylamine,
while the secondary alcohol was oxidized with SO3•Py, DMSO,
and Et3N (Parikh-Doering oxidation)25 to give enone 15.
Iodination of 15 was carried out with iodine in pyridine and
CH2Cl226 to give R-iodoenone, which was subsequently reduced
under Luche’s conditions27 to 16 as a single product. Sono-
gashira coupling28 of iodide 16 with (trimethylsilyl)acetylene
gave eneyne 17 in quantitative yield. Acetone moiety was
installed to the C-4a position of 17 via Claisen rearrangement
of allyl-2-propenyl ether 18. Thus, 17 was treated with 2-meth-
oxypropene in the presence of pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate
(PPTS) to give a mixture of unstable propenyl ether 18, methyl
acetal, and the starting alcohol 17, which were separated on
silica gel (neutral) column chromatography to give 18 in 56%
yield.29 The recovered materials could be converted to 18 under
the same conditions. After three cycles, an overall yield of 89%
was obtained for 18. The Claisen rearrangement of 18 proceeded
upon heating at 150 °C in o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) in the
Hydroxylations of both neighboring sides of the acetone
moiety were carried out stepwise by regioselective enolization
followed by oxygenation (Scheme 3). The ketone 19 was first
treated with TBSOTf and triethylamine to give exclusively the
corresponding vinyl silyl ether at the terminal position, which
was then oxidized with lead tetraacetate (LTA).31 The resulting
crude products, presumably an acetyl silyl acetal, were exposed
to n-Bu4NF (TBAF) to give acetoxyacetone 20, which was
deacetylated to afford hydroxyacetone 21 in excellent overall
yield. Hydroxylation of the internal position was difficult due
to little enolization toward the C-5 position, so 21 was once
converted to R-aldehyde ketone, and then it was tried for the
enolization due to dipole-dipole interaction. Thus, upon
Parikh-Doering oxidation of 21, the resulting R-aldehyde
ketone spontaneously enolized to 22 as an unstable product.
After protection of the enol as methoxymethyl (MOM) ether,
the aldehyde was reduced under the Luche’s reductions to give
23. Geometry of the enol ether was established to be Z from
NOESY correlation as shown in structure 23. Epoxidation of
23 with m-chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA) in the presence of
potassium carbonate32 gave unstable products, which were
directly hydrolyzed with Amberlite 15 ion-exchange resin (H+
form) to give dihydroxylacetone 24 as a 7:1 mixture of the
diastereomers; thus, the major product was separated and
isolated in 74% yield along with the minor isomer in about 10%
yield. As it turned out later, the configuration of C-5 was
revealed to be S. The stable conformation of enol ether 23 is
shown in Figure 2, which was assigned from two large coupling
constants (10.5 Hz both) between H-4 and H-4a and H-4a and
H-5 in the 1H NMR spectra. This diastereomeric selectivity (ca.
7:1) might be rationalized by the cooperative effect33 of
hydrogen bonds of MCPBA with the allylic alcohol and oxygen
(20) For reviews of the Overman rearrangement, see: (a) Overman, L. E. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 218-224. (b) Ritter, K. In Houben-Weyl. Stereose-
lectiVe Synthesis. E 21; Helmchen, G., Hoffmann, R. W., Mulzer, J.,
Schaumann, E., Eds.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 1996; Vol. 9, pp 5677-
5699.
(21) Isobe, M.; Fukuda, Y.; Nishikawa, T.; Chabert, P.; Kawai, T.; Goto, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3327-3330.
(22) Isobe, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Pikul, S.; Goto, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28,
6485-6488. (b) Isobe, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Nishikawa, T. In LeVoglucose-
none and LeVoglucosans, Chemistry and Applications. Witczak, Z. J. Ed.;
ATL Press: Mount Prospect, IL, 1994; pp 99-118.
(23) Bamba, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Isobe, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6639-6650.
(24) Ichikawa, Y.; Isobe, M.; Bai, D.-L.; Goto, T. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4737-
4776.
(25) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. von E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505.
(26) Johnson, C. R.; Adams, J. P.; Braun, M. P.; Senanayke, C. B. W.;
Wovkulich, P. M.; Uskokovic, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 917-
918.
(27) Germal, A. L.; Luche, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5454-5459.
(28) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagiwara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16,
4467-4470.
(29) Since the product 18 was sensitive to acid as silica gel, neutral silica gel
with eluent containing a small amount of triethylamine was employed for
this chromatography. For details, see experimental procedure in the
Supporting Information.
(30) In the absence of K2CO2, some degree of hydrolysis to 17 was observed.
(31) (a) Rubottom, G. M.; Gruber, J. M.; Kincaid, K. Synth. Commun. 1976, 6,
59-62. (b) Rubottom, G. M.; Gruber, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1673-
1674.
(32) In the presence of Na2HPO4 instead of K2CO3, the resulting epoxides were
partially incorporated with the residual m-chlorobenzoic acid to give a
mixture of 24 and the byproducts, which upon hydrolysis (K2CO3, MeOH)
were converted to 24 in ca. 30% yield from 23.
9
8800 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 29, 2003