Figure 1. Approaches to the synthesis of the C ring in the preparation of bryostatin analogues 1a and 1b.6a,8b
known analogues and for more flexible access to new C ring
analogues (Figure 1).
The first subgoal of this effort was the preparation of
hydropyranone 12 (Scheme 1). Three separate routes were
examined based on fragments 3, 10, and 11. The preparation
of these fragments started with the alkylation of methyl
isobutyrate with allyl bromide to give ester 15. Free radical
bromination with N-bromosuccinimide provided the allylic
bromide,10 which was treated with p-methoxybenzyl (PMB)
alcohol under basic conditions, to give a mixture of PMB
and methyl esters 16a,b upon quenching with NH4OH.
Weinreb amide 17 is obtained through treatment of this
mixture with the magnesium anion of N,O-dimethylhydroxyl-
amine. Reaction of 17 with MeLi gave methyl ketone 10 in
excellent yield. The formation of acid chloride 3 entailed
hydrolysis of 16a,b to acid 16c and subsequent reaction with
NaH and oxalyl chloride. Diketone 11 was obtained from 3
by reaction of the latter with the enolate of acetone.
The individual conversion of fragments 3, 10, and 11 to
hydropyranone 12 was next examined. Condensation of the
dianion of diketone 11 with aldehyde 4a11 at -78 °C gave
compound 19 with a modest 58% diastereoselectivity (ds)
at C23. Similar selectivity was observed in earlier work using
5, the lower homologue of 11 (Figure 1).6a In an effort to
improve this selectivity, the sequence of bond-forming events
was changed and the enolate of acetone was condensed with
aldehyde 4a to give 18 which was then condensed as its
dianion with acid chloride 3 to give 19 now with an improved
81% ds.12 In a third approach, aldehyde 4a was allylated
following Brown’s protocol13 to give alcohol 20 in 83% ds.
The major isomer was then protected as the TBS ether and
Our previous approaches to bryostatin analogues are based
on the late-stage convergent coupling of the C ring 14 to a
spacer domain 13 through esterification at C25 followed by
a novel macrotransacetalization that establishes a dioxolane
B ring with thermodynamic control of the C15 stereocenter.
The C ring 14 is derived from precursors 6 and 9 through
either C22-C23 or C23-C24 bond formation, allowing for
differences in the timing of introduction of stereochemistry
at C25 and C26. Both approaches require late stage homolo-
gation of C17 to introduce C15 and C16. Initially, this
process required four steps. More recent work involving the
use of an alkoxyvinyl zincate has reduced this homologation
to a single step, although it still requires the use of a densely
and delicately appointed advanced stage intermediate.8b The
strategies reported herein were motivated by the view that
this C15-C17 fragment could be introduced early in the
synthesis thereby avoiding this late stage manipulation. A
further consequence of this approach is increased flexibility
in the C22-C23 bond formation and consequent control of
stereochemistry. Finally, when coupled with our macrotrans-
acetalization strategy, this early introduction of the C15-
C17 fragment allows for the conversion of many interme-
diates along the synthetic path into macrocycles with varied
C rings.
Three strategies are reported herein, each benefiting from
the early introduction of the C15-C17 fragment and differing
by the timing and selectivity of stereogenesis at C23.
(8) (a) Wender, P. A.; Hinkle, K. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6725-
6729. (b) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennett, C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner,
S. E.; Clarke, M. O.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; LaCote, E.; Lippa, B. S.; Nell,
P. G.; Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13648-13649.
(9) (a) Hale, K. J.; Frigerio, M.; Manaviazar, S.; Hummersone, M. G.;
Fillingham, I. J.; Barsukov, I. G.; Damblon, C. F.; Gescher, A.; Roberts,
G. C. K. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 499-502. (b) Hale, K. J.; Frigero, M.;
Manaviazar, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 503-505.
(10) Greenwood, F. L.; Kellert, M. D.; Sedlak, J. In Organic Syntheses;
Rabjohn, N., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1963; Collect. Vol. IV,
pp 108-110.
(11) Prepared in five steps from (R)-(+)-methyl lactate. See ref 6a.
(12) Claffey, M. M.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7646-
7647.
(13) Brown, H. C.; Jadhav, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2092-
2093.
4550
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 24, 2003