Lewis Base Activation of Lewis Acids
A R T I C L E S
studies by Mukaiyama22 and continuing into the studies of the
highly selective catalysts developed by Masamune.23 These
studies show that the levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity
observed in the reactions of E- and Z-isomers of the silyl ketene
acetals are often not comparable. Furthermore, only a few
isolated examples of anti diastereoselectivity have been re-
ported.24,25
Scheme 4
Another interesting class of silyl ketene acetals that have
received only limited attention are silyl dienol ethers.26 The
vinylogous aldol reaction is important because it provides rapid
access to larger fragments useful for the synthesis of polypro-
pionate-derived natural products. This type of aldol reaction
introduces the added challenge of site selectivity along with
the issues of diastereo- and enantioselectivity. In contrast to the
vinylogous aldol reaction of metallodienolates, the reactions of
silyl dienol ethers occur preferentially at the γ-carbon because
these reactions typically operate under frontier molecular orbital
control (Figure 3).27 Most asymmetric methods provide high
regio- and enantioselectivities only for a limited group of
lactone- and dioxanone-derived silyl dienol ethers.28 The reac-
tions of simple ester-derived silyl dienol ethers are limited, and
products are only obtained with moderate enantioselectivity.29
an investigation of the reaction with respect to aldehyde structure
will be undertaken to illustrate substrate scope and functional
group compatibility.30
Results
1. Acetate-Derived Silyl Ketene Acetal Additions. The
promising results from the addition of the weakly nucleophilic
tri-n-butylallylstannane (N ) 5.82)19 to aldehydes promoted by
the phosphoramide/SiCl4 catalyst system suggested that the more
nucleophilic silyl ketene acetals would also prove to be viable
substrates (N ) 9.49 for 3).19 However, the high reactivity of
these species raised immediate concerns about the possibilities
of (1) competitive background reaction, (2) silyl metathesis to
trichlorosilyl enol ethers, and (3) very early transition structures,
all of which would lead to reduced levels of selectivity. Initial
experiments with the commercially available silyl ketene acetal,
1-methoxy-1-tert-butyldimethylsilyloxyethene (1a), were con-
ducted using the optimal conditions developed previously for
the allylation reaction.17 The bulky tert-butyldimethylsilyl ketene
Figure 3. Site selectivity of vinylogous aldol reactions.
Thus, despite the enormous number of asymmetric aldol
reactions of silyl ketene acetals on record, we felt that a
comparison of the phosphoramide/SiCl4 catalyst system with
existing methods would provide an interesting test for the
concept and may also address some of the remaining synthetic
challenges in this field. The primary objective of this study was
to assay the catalyst system in the reactions of three classes of
ester-derived silyl ketene acetals (Scheme 4). Initial studies
would focus on the reactions of acetate-derived silyl ketene
acetals to establish proof of principle and to elucidate the
reactivity and enantioselectivity of this catalyst system. The
survey would then be expanded to include propanoate-derived
silyl ketene acetals and silyl dienol ethers to investigate
additional levels of site and stereochemical complexity. Finally,
(28) For boron, see: (a) Kiyooka, S.-I.; Hena, M. A.; Yabukami, T.; Murai, K.;
Goto, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7511-7516. (b) Sato, M.; Sunami,
S.; Sugita, Y.; Kaneko, C. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 839-845. For
titanium, see: (c) Paterson, I.; Davies, R. D. M.; Heimann, A. C.; Marquez,
R.; Meyer, A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4477-4480. (d) DeRosa, M.; Acocella,
M. R.; Villano, R.; Soriente, A.; Scettri, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003,
14, 2499-2502. (e) DeRosa, M.; Acocella, M. R.; Soriente, A.; Scettri, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1529-1531. (f) Soriente, A.; DeRosa,
M.; Stanzione, M.; Villano, R.; Scettri, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001,
12, 959-963. (g) DeRosa, M.; Soriente, A.; Scettri, A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3187-3195. (h) Szlosek, M.; Figadere, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1799-1801. (i) Soriente, A.; DeRosa, M.;
Apicella, A.; Scettri, A.; Sodano, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10,
4481-4484. (j) Anne, S.; Yong, W.; Vandewalle, M. Synlett 1999, 1435-
1437. (k) Kim, Y.; Singer, R. A.; Carriera, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 1261-1263. (l) Pichon, M.; Jullian, J.-C.; Figadere, B.; Cave,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1755-1758. (m) Sato, M.; Sunami, S.;
Sugita, Y.; Kaneko, C. Heterocycles 1995, 41, 1435-1444. For copper,
see: (n) Fettes, A.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4098-
4101. (o) Evans, D. A.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Murry, J. A.; Burgey, C. S.;
Campos, K. R.; Connell, B. T.; Staples, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 669-685. (p) Pagenkopf, B. L.; Kru¨ger, J.; Stojanovic, A.; Carreira,
E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3124-3126. (q) Kru¨ger, J.; Carreira,
E. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7013-7016. (r) Kru¨ger, J.; Carreira, E.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 837-838. (s) Singer, R. A.; Carreira, E.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12360-12361. For chromium, see: (t)
Shimada, Y.; Matsuoka, Y.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 2004, 57-60. (u)
Onitsuka, S.; Matsuoka, Y.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32,
974-975. (v) Matsuoka, Y.; Irie, R.; Katsuki, T. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32,
584-585.
(21) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Inubushi, A.; Suda, S.; Hara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Chem.
Lett. 1990, 1015-1018. (b) Carreira, E. M.; Singer, R. A.; Lee, W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8837-8838. (c) Evans, D. A.; Murry, J. A.;
Kozlowski, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5814-5815.
(22) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Furuya, M.; Ohtsubo, A.; Mukaiyama, T. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 635-638. (b) Kobayashi, S.; Fujishita, Y.; Mukaiyama,
T. Chem Lett. 1990, 1455-1458.
(23) (a) Masamune, S.; Sato, T.; Kim, B.; Wollman, T. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 8279-8281. (b) Parmee, E. R.; Tempkin, O.; Masamune, S.;
Abiko, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9365-9366. (c) Parmee, E. R.;
Hong, Y. P.; Tempkin, O.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
1729-1732.
(24) (a) Mikami, K.; Matsukawa, S.; Sawa, E.; Harada, A.; Koga, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 1951-1954. (b) Evans, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C.;
Campos, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10859-10860. (c) Mikami,
K.; Matsukawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7039-7040.
(25) The zirconium(IV) BINOL system achieves high anti diastereoselectivity
with a synthetically useful degree of stereoconvergence for a wide variety
of substrates: (a) Yamashita, Y.; Ishitani, H.; Shimizu, H.; Kobayashi, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3292-3302. (b) Ishitani, H.; Yamashita, Y.;
Shimizu, H.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5403-5404.
(26) Casiraghi, G.; Zanardi, F.; Appendino, G.; Rassu, G. Chem. ReV. 2000,
100, 1929-1972.
(29) (a) Bluet, G.; Campagne, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4293-4298. (b)
Brennan, C. J.; Campange, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5195-5197.
(c) Bluet, G.; Bazan-Tajeda, B.; Campange, J.-M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3807-
3810. (d) Bluet, G.; Campagne, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5507-
5509.
(30) Portions of this work have been communicated: (a) Denmark, S. E.; Wynn,
T.; Beutner, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13405-13407. (b)
Denmark, S. E.; Beutner, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7800-7801.
(27) (a) Fleming, I. Frontier Orbitals and Organic Reactions; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1996. For a notable exception, see: (b) Saito, S.;
Nagahara, T.; Shiozawa, M.; Nakadai, M.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 6200-6210.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 11, 2005 3777