Organometallics 2003, 22, 3357-3359
3357
High ly Isosp ecific P olym er iza tion of Meth yl
Meth a cr yla te w ith a Bis(p yr r olyla ld im in a to)sa m a r iu m
Hyd r oca r byl Com p lex
Chunming Cui, Alexandr Shafir, Craig L. Reeder, and J ohn Arnold*
Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley,
Berkeley, California 94720-1460
Received J une 12, 2003
Summary: New types of samarium alkyl complexes, L2-
SmMe (THF) (2) and L2SmCH2SiMe3(THF) (3), sup-
ported by the pyrrolylaldiminato ligand L (L ) [2-(2,6-
iPr2C6H3NdCH)-5-tBuC4H2N]-), were prepared from the
corresponding chloride L2SmCl(THF) (1) with the ap-
propriate alkyllithium reagents; the corresponding yt-
trium alkyl L2YCH2SiMe3 (4) was prepared similarly.
The molecular structures of 1 and 3 were determined
by X-ray single-crystal analyses. Compound 3 initializes
the stereospecific polymerization of MMA to yield highly
isotactic PMMA (mm triad 94.8%) with high molecular
weight and narrow molecular distribution at room
temperature while 2 is inactive. The possible initial step
of the polymerization reaction was proposed.
of the known lanthanide systems show high stereoregu-
larity (mm or rr triad >90%) for MMA polymerization
at room temperature, which is a current strategic
objective.
We communicate herein that a non-metallocene, one-
component lanthanide system initializes polymerization
of MMA to generate highly isotactic PMMA with high
molecular weight even at elevated temperature. The
system is based on a bulky pyrroylaldiminato ligand16
and does not contain any chiral groups.
The samarium chloride L2SmCl(THF) (1) was ob-
tained by the reaction of KL (L ) [2-(CHdNC6H3-2,6-
iPr2)-5-tBuC4N]-) with SmCl3 in THF. The correspond-
ing hydrocarbyls L2SmR(THF) (R ) Me (2), CH2SiMe3
(3)) were prepared in high yield by the reaction of 1 with
the appropriate alkyllithium in toluene (Scheme 1). The
1H NMR spectra of the paramagnetic 2 and 3 include
the broad resonances of one coordinated THF molecule
and the R-protons for the alkyl moieties. The yttrium
compound L2YCH2SiMe3 (4) was prepared similarly.
Compound 4 is THF free, is monomeric (doublet of CH2-
SiMe3, δ 44.61, 44.17; 1J Y,C ) 44.2 Hz), and is produced
A substantial amount of work has been devoted to the
development of well-defined single-component catalytic
systems for polymerization of polar functional mono-
mers in a controlled fashion.1 Pioneering work by
Yasuda and Collins has shown that lanthanocenes2 and
cationic zirconocenes3 are excellent precursors for the
controlled polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA).
Recent studies have shown that ansa-metallocenes of
cationic group 4 enolates and multiple-component cata-
lytic systems can polymerize MMA stereospecifically
under certain conditions.3-5 In addition, a number of
lanthanocenes have been reported to generate syndio-
rich poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) under mild
conditions;6-15 while C1-symmetric ansa-bridged lan-
thanocenes were reported to induce isospecific polym-
erization of MMA at low temperature.8 However, none
1
as one diastereomer, as indicated by its H and 13C NMR
spectra. Attempts to prepare the methyl derivative in
this case have, thus far, been unsuccessful. The NMR
spectrum of compound 4 is unperturbed by addition of
several equivalents of THF in C6D6, and the solid
compound shows no evidence of coordinated solvent
when isolated in the presence of THF.
The molecular structures of 1 and 3, as determined
by single-crystal X-ray analyses,17 are shown in Figure
1, along with selected bond distances and angles. Both
1 and 3 adopt a distorted-octahedral geometry with the
THF oxygen located trans to one pyrrole nitrogen (O-
Sm-N angle 160.4(2)° in 1 and 160.37(9)° in 3). The
most striking features are the acute N-Sm-N angles
(average 70.3° in 1 and 69.12° in 3) of the chelating
ligand. Importantly, both compounds display molecular
C1 symmetry while the two pyrrolyaldiminato ligands
adopt an approximate C2 arrangement. The Sm-C bond
length in 3 is comparable to those found in a handful of
samarium alkyls characterized by X-ray diffraction
analysis, (C5Me5)2SmR(THF) (R ) Me, 2.484(14) Å;
R ) benzyl, 2.498(5) Å; R ) Ph, 2.511(5) Å),18-20 and
(1) Yasuda, H. J . Organomet. Chem. 2002, 647, 128-138.
(2) Yasuda, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Yokota, K.; Miyake, S.; Nakamura,
A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4908-4910.
(3) Collins, S.; Ward, D. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5460-
5462.
(4) Bolig, A. D.; Chen, E. Y. X. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7943-
7944.
(5) Deng, H.; Shiono, T.; Soga, K. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 3067.
(6) Bala, M. D.; Huang, J . L.; Zhang, H.; Qian, Y. L.; Sun, J . Q.;
Liang, C. F. J . Organomet. Chem. 2002, 647, 105-113.
(7) Boffa, L. S.; Novak, B. M. J . Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1998, 133,
123-130.
(8) Giardello, M. A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Brard, L.; Marks, T. J . J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3276-3277.
(9) Hou, Z. M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 231, 1-22.
(10) Ihara, E.; Taguchi, M.; Yasuda, H. Appl. Organomet. Chem.
1995, 9, 427-429.
(11) Li, F. F.; J in, Y. T.; Song, C. L.; Lin, Y. H.; Pei, F. K.; Wang, F.
S.; Hu, N. H. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 10, 761-771.
(12) Nodono, M.; Tokimitsu, T.; Tone, S.; Makino, T.; Yanagase, A.
Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000, 201, 2282-2288.
(13) Yasuda, H.; Ihara, E. J . Synth. Org. Chem. J pn. 1993, 51, 931-
941.
(14) Ying, L. Q.; Ba, X. W.; Zhao, Y. Y.; Li, G.; Tang, T.; J in, Y. T.
Chin. J . Polym. Sci. 2001, 19, 85-87.
(15) Zi, G. F.; Li, H. W.; Xie, Z. W. Organometallics 2002, 21, 1136-
1145.
(16) Hao, H. J .; Bhandari, S.; Ding, Y. Q.; Roesky, H. W.; Magull,
J .; Schmidt, H. G.; Noltemeyer, M.; Cui, C. M. Eur. J . Inorg. Chem.
2002, 1060-1065. For transition metal chemistry with less hindered
examples, see: Matsui, S.; Spaniol, T. P.; Takagi, Y.; Yoshida, Y.;
Okuda, J . J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 4529, and refs therein.
(17) See the Supporting Information for X-ray crystal data for
complexes 1 and 2.
10.1021/om030454f CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 07/17/2003