´
L. Martınez et al. / Thermochimica Acta 395 (2003) 21–26
25
Based on the acid–base reaction in the gaseous
phase, DgHmꢁ , the corresponding enthalpy values are
related to the reaction:
heating and it was assumed that the enthalpy of
sublimation of the adduct is equivalent to the enthalpy
of sublimation of 1 mol of the corresponding ligands
[18]. This previous hypothesis was then supported
by a series of sublimable adducts [26]. The principle
was based on the assumption that the intermolecular
forces in the adduct and ligand are very similar, since
the crystalline structure of the formed compound and
ligand remain virtually unchanged [18].
By comparing the calculated thermochemical data,
some features can be detected: (a) for lysine the DrHmꢁ
data vary linearly with the number of ligands. However,
this general tendency is not observed for hDi(Cu–L)
values. This fact suggests that for these compounds the
structural solid state features associated with coordina-
tion play a major role in the energetic behavior, and (b)
considering hDi(Cu–L) values for adducts of lysine
and glycine with the same stoichiometry, it is observed
that the former ligand exhibits much higher metal–
amino acid values, proving that the copper–lysine
interaction is more effective than the copper–glycine
one.
It is worth mentioning that, for the adducts of lys
and gly with copper, each amino acid molecule
is bonded to the cation through two distinct bonds,
that are copper–oxygen and copper–nitrogen. Conse-
quently, the mean metal–ligand bond [hDi(M–L)]
values listed in Table 4 are, in reality, the sum of
these two contributions. However, as reported for the
chelate [27] Cu(gly)2, there is no way of calculating
the individual contributions of each individual bond.
However, the calculation for cadmium–oxygen bond
in a 1:2 glycine adduct [7] gave the value 82:3 Æ
5:0 kJ molÀ1. Supposing there is a certain similarity in
cadmium and copper bonds in these adducts, then
the copper–nitrogen bond in the synthesized copper
adduct, could be estimated as near to 70 kJ molÀ1. The
mean values obtained of 163 kJ molÀ1 for the adducts
CuCl2ꢀngly (n ¼ 1; 2) are lower than the estimated
value of 413 kJ molÀ1 for the previously considered
chelate [19]. This fact could be easily understood by
considering that the observed difference in metal–
amino acid interactions for each individual compound
can be related to the nature of the bonds of the
compound formed. Thus, a high value for the nitrogen
and oxygen bonds in the chelate compound is
expected due to their more pronounced covalent
metal–amino acid bond character.
CuCl2ðgÞ þ 4LðgÞ ¼ CuCl2 ꢀ 4LðgÞ
The expression to calculate these enthalpy values is
DgHmꢁ ¼ DrHmꢁ À DcgrHmꢁ ðCuCl2Þ À ðn À 1ÞDgcrHmꢁ ðLÞ
Using DgHmꢁ values, the mean metal–ligand bond
dissociation enthalpy can be calculated using the
following expression for a compound with n ligands:
DgHmꢁ
n
hDiðMÀLÞ ¼
In order to calculate these thermochemical data, the
standard molar enthalpy of formation of copper chlor-
ide in the crystal phase of À218:0 Æ 1:0 kJ molÀ1 and
that related to the gaseous phase of À43.3 kJ molÀ1
[19], enabled the enthalpy of sublimation to be calcu-
lated as 174:7 Æ 1:0 kJ molÀ1. Also needed are the
standard molar enthalpies of formation in the con-
densed and in the gaseous phases for ligands used in
forming these adducts. For glycine, two independent
determinations are reported [20,21]: À527:5 Æ 0:5 and
À528:61 Æ 0:34 kJ molÀ1 for the condensed phase,
and for gaseous phase [20], the value of À390:5 Æ
4:6 kJ molÀ1 is also reported. The standard molar
enthalpy of sublimation is then 138:1 Æ 4:6 kJ molÀ1
.
[22,23]: 130:5 Æ 2:1 and 136:4 Æ 0:4 kJ molÀ1. Based
on these published results, and to maintain coherence
in the collected values, then the couple for the crystal-
line phase and for sublimation [20] of À528:61 Æ 0:34
and 138:1 Æ 4:6 kJ molÀ1, respectively, were used in
all calculations.
The standard molar enthalpy of formation of lysine
in the condensed phase [20] of À678:7 Æ 1:5 kJ molÀ1
was also chosen. However, the standard enthalpy of
formation of lysine in the gaseous phase was estimated
by means of the group addition method [24] as
À449 Æ 20 kJ molÀ1. The deviation quoted was esti-
mated from the maximum error found for similar
amino acids: glycine, alanine, valine and leucine,
for which experimental have been reported [25]. From
these values the enthalpy of sublimation of lysine was
estimated as 239 Æ 20 kJ molÀ1
.
In attempting to obtain information about the acid–
base interactive process in gaseous phase, the enthal-
pies of sublimation for the adducts must be known.
However, this class of compounds decomposes on