Anaesthesia, 2002, 57, pages 1134–1145
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Correspondence
patients. Critical Care Medicine 2002; 30:
815–19.
procedure. The oesophageal tear could
have been avoided by bronchoscopy.
(d) In patients with thick secretions
or blood clot in the airway, it would be
difficult to perform an effective suction
via a microlaryngeal tube during trach-
eostomy.
Despite the growth of multiple per-
cutaneous techniques in recent years,
there has been a decreasing trend
of immediate or early complications of
tracheostomy since the introduction of
the Ciaglia serial dilatational technique.
This may be as a result of more training
and increasing use of bronchoscopy
during the procedure. We believe using
a bronchoscope through the existing
tracheal tube should lead to a safer
percutaneous tracheostomy. The use of
a microlaryngeal tube prevents this
option.
changed over a gum elastic bougie.
The risk of losing the airway during this
part of the procedure was recognised
as a potential problem. The fact that
no difficulties were encountered using
this simple precaution contrasts dra-
matically with the figure of 14%
incidence of complications suggested
by Dr Mallick.
7 Beiderlinden M, Karl Walz M, Sander
A, Groeben H, Peters J. Complications
of bronchoscopically guided percuta-
neous dilational tracheostomy: beyond
the learning curve. Intensive Care Medi-
cine 2002; 28: 59–62.
8 Ravat F, Pommier C, Dorne R. Per-
cutaneous tracheostomy. Annales
Francaises D Anesthesie et de Reanimation
2001; 20: 260–81.
Use of the bronchoscope. It was pointed
out in the original paper that a disad-
vantage of this method was that it did
not allow the utilisation of a broncho-
scope. We agree that the use of a
bronchoscope for confirming the place-
ment of the guide wire and tracheosto-
my tube is desirable. Since the
publication of the paper, we have been
extending our technique so as to permit
the use of a bronchoscope while main-
taining the airway with a microlaryngeal
tube. The oesophageal tear reported in
the series represents a major complica-
tion. This problem may even occur
despite the use of a bronchoscope.
The relevant point here is that the
misplacement of the tracheostomy tube
was readily identified without the loss of
airway control. The situation could be
rectified without loss of the patient’s
oxygenation or ventilation. In the case
reported, the patient was not put at
risk, the tear was explored and repaired
in the neck and did not require a
thoracotomy.
Suctioning via a microlaryngeal tube.
During this series, no procedure needed
to be abandoned due to difficulty with
maintaining an airway. On a number of
occasions following re-intubation, the
microlaryngeal tube needed to be
cleared of secretions using a suction
catheter of the appropriate size. It is
feasible that torrential haemorrhage
could occur during tracheostomy with
the formation of large clots. It would be
anticipated that the percutaneous pro-
cedure would need to be abandoned in
such an instance.
A reply
Thank you for allowing us to take the
opportunity of replying to Dr Mallick’s
letter. Dealing with the points raised
sequentially.
Control of ventilation. We agree that
the control of ventilation during trach-
eostomy is important. Provided that the
ventilator is adjusted to the ‘constant
volume’ mode and that the inspired
tidal volume is adjusted so that the
exhaled tidal volume and minute ven-
tilation remain close to or greater than
that recorded prior to commencing the
tracheostomy, then the arterial carbon
dioxide tension can be maintained at an
optimal value. Under these conditions,
the peak airway pressure will rise due to
the resistance of the smaller tracheal
tube; however, there is no or little
change in the plateau pressure. Correct
packing of the pharynx will reduce any
gas leak to a minimum.
If an ordinary tracheal tube is used
with a bronchoscope, then depending
on the relative sizes of the relative size
of the tracheal tube and the broncho-
scope, the effective diameter of the
tracheal airway may well be reduced to
a value not dissimilar to that of a micro-
laryngeal tube.
A. Mallick
Leeds General Infirmary,
Leeds, UK
References
1 Dosemeci L, Yilmaz M, Gurpinar F,
Ramazanoglu A. The use of the laryn-
geal mask airway as an alternative to the
endotracheal tube during percutaneous
dilatational tracheostomy. Intensive Care
Medicine 2002; 28: 63–7.
2 Verghese C, Rangasami J, Kapila A,
Parke T. Airway control during per-
cutaneous dilatational tracheostomy:
pilot study with the intubating laryngeal
mask airway. British Journal of Anaes-
thesia 1998; 81: 608–9.
3 Johnson R, Bailie R. Airway manage-
ment device (AMD) for airway control
in percutaneous dilatational tracheos-
tomy. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 596–7.
4 Mallick A, Quinn A, Bodenham A,
Vucevic M. Use of the Combitube for
airway maintenance during percutane-
ous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaes-
thesia 1998; 53: 249–55.
Following insertion of the tracheos-
tomy tube, ventilation can still be
maintained via the micro laryngeal tube.
This allows for the correct placement of
the tracheostomy tube to be confirmed
before the original airway is lost. This is
not always possible when the original
tracheal is used and pulled back as the
tracheostomy tube is inserted into the
trachea.
5 Fantoni A, Ripamonti D. A non-de-
rivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the
translaryngeal method. Intensive Care
Medicine 1997; 23: 386–92.
D. Read
D. Duane
The Princess Royal Hospital, Haywards
Heath RH16 4EX, UK
6 Cantais E, Kaiser E, Le-Goff Y,
Palmier B. Percutaneous tracheostomy:
prospective comparison of the transla-
ryngeal technique versus the forceps-
dilational technique in 100 critically ill
Changing the existing tracheal tube for a
microlaryngeal tube. In the series repor-
ted, the tracheal tube was always
L. Fisher
Derriford Hospital,
Plymouth, UK
ꢁ 2002 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1139