Alder adducts 16-31 in 52-96% yields. The Diels-Alder
adducts 16-21 were obtained in about the same anti/syn
ratios as the corresponding non-fluorous adducts.8 Although
the anti and the syn isomers 16/19, 17/20, and 18/21 have
the same fluorous tag, they were easily separated on a
semipreparative FluoroFlash HPLC column.9 In contrast,
separation on a reverse-phase HPLC column10 or on flash-
grade silica gel was not possible.
Comparison of reaction times in Table 1 shows that the
fluorous maleimides 4 and 5 have a similar reactivity, but
that the fluorous [1,2,4]triazoline-3,5-dione 10 is much more
reactive. Kinetic studies showed that 10 is at least 1000 times
more reactive toward DPBD 15 than 4 or 5.
all these adducts have C8F17 tags. All Diels-Alder adducts
from 4 and 5 had longer retention times than the correspond-
ing polar dienophiles themselves (entries 14, 15). Small,
nonpolar organic domains in the Diels-Alder adduct pro-
duced longer retention times than larger, more polar domains
(compare 16/19 in entry 1 with 26 in entry 8, for example).
We used a standard protocol to compare fluorous dieno-
philes 4, 5, and 10 in typical scavenging reactions (Figure
2). An excess of a diene (0.15 mmol) was reacted with
We calibrated the reactivity of 10 against that of 4-phenyl-
[1,2,4]triazoline-3,5-dione (32), which is one of the most
reactive dienophiles known. These results are shown in
Scheme 2.
Scheme 2. Competition Experiment between 10, 32, and 33
Figure 2. Standard Procedure for the Scavenging Reactions.
0.10 mmol of maleic anhydride (MA, 1), N-phenylmaleimide
(PMI, 36), or DMAD (37), respectively. When TLC analysis
showed that the diene was consumed, a fluorous scavenger
4, 5, or 10 was added. Separation was done by FSPE on
5 g FluoroFlash cartridges5 eluting with MeOH/H2O 8/2.
The results of a series of scavenging experiments are
summarized in Table 2. After FSPE, the Diels-Alder adducts
were isolated in 77-99% yield and in 84-97% purity. These
F
Equimolar amounts of 10, 32, and DEAD 335,11 were
1
adducts were analyzed by GC and their H NMR spectra,
which were consistent with literature data.12,13 A second
elution with diethyl ether provided the excess of the
scavengers 4 and 5 and the corresponding fluorous Diels-
Alder adducts, which had been previously prepared (Table
1). The excess of 10 decomposed on the fluorous silica gel,
in those cases (Table 2, entries 4, 6, and 11) the diethyl ether
elution gave pure compounds 18/21 or 28. The anthracene/
maleic anhydride adducts decomposed selectively in a
methanolysis reaction to give the half-methyl ester (not
shown; see Supporting Information) during the FSPE (entries
7 and 11). This problem was solved by using a MeCN/H2O
mixture for elution during FSPE instead of MeOH/H2O.
MeCN/H2O in an 8/2 ratio was used for the C8F17-tagged
scavenger 4 (entries 8 and 14), while for the C6F13-tagged
scavenger 5, the ratio was 6/4 (entries 9 and 10).
allowed to compete for a deficiency of the diene 15 (0.33
equiv) in CD2Cl2 at rt. After 45 min, H NMR analysis
1
showed that diene 15 was consumed and 31 and 34 were
present in a 51/49 ratio; 35 was not detected. This shows
that 10 and 32 have similar reactivities and both are in turn
much more reactive than 33.
The last column of Table 1 also collects the retention times
of all the adducts on a FluoroFlash HPLC column eluting
with 80/20 MeOH/water. Non-fluorous-tagged compounds
elute at or near the solvent front under these conditions. The
Diels-Alder adducts from 5 with the C6F13-tag showed
shorter retention times than those from 4 and 10 with the
C8F17-tag. Adducts from the more polar 10 eluted prior to
adducts from 4 (compare entries 1/3, 4/5, etc.), even though
(6) Cookson, R. C.; Gupte, S. S.; Stevens, I. D. R.; Watts, C. T. Org.
Synth. 1971, 51, 121-127.
(12) (a) Kalindjian, S. B.; Buck, I. M.; Cushnir, J. R.; Dunstone, D. J.;
Hudson, M. L.; Low, C. M. R.; McDonald, I. M.; Pether, M. J.; Steel, K.
I. M.; Tozer, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4294-4302. (b) Ballistreri, F.
P.; Maccarone, E.; Perrini, G.; Tomaselli, G. A.; Torre, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1982, 273-277.
(7) Mintz, M. J.; Walling, C. Org. Synth. 1969, 49, 9-12.
(8) Letourneau, J. E.; Wellman, M. A.; Burnell, D. J. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 7272-7277.
(9) FluoroFlash HPLC column (FTI), 20 × 250 mm.
(10) Symmetry C-18 5 µm (Waters), 3.9 × 150 mm.
(11) Dandapani, S.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3855-3864.
(13) Compounds 39, 40, 46, and 47 were separately synthesized and
characterized.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 18, 2003
3295