P. Yadav et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 349 (2003) 30Á
/36
31
570 spectrophotometer UV/VIS/NIR. The 1H (250.13
MHz) and 13C (62.90 MHz) spectra were obtained on a
Bruker AMX-400 spectrometer at room temperature
with the signal of free DMSO or CHCl3 (at 2.49 and
7.24 ppm, respectively) as reference. The complexes were
analyzed for C, H, N and S in a Carlo-Erba EA 1108 at
the University of Ioannina. Analyses of palladium and
chlorine were performed in our laboratory by gravi-
metric and potentiometric techniques, respectively.
Electrochemical measurements were made using an
Autolab PGSTAT30 potentiostat with a platinum
microsphere as working electrode, a platinum wire
auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode
in a three electrode configuration. Ferrocene was added
at the end of each experiment and used as an internal
standard. All potentials are reported relative to a Ag/
AgCl reference electrode and ferrocinium/ferrocene
of 6, which was mounted on a glass fiber and used for
data collection. Cell constants and an orientation matrix
for data collection were obtained by least-squares
refinement of the diffraction data from 25 reflections
in the range 2.12B
/
u B
/
25.008 on a Bruker-P4 diffract-
ometer. Data were collected at 293 K using Mo Ka
˚
radiation (lꢂ0.71073 A) and the v-scan technique, and
/
corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects [19]. A
semi-empirical absorption correction (C-scans) was
made. The structure was solved by Patterson and
Fourier methods [20] and refined on F2 by a full-matrix
least-squares procedure using anisotropic displacement
parameters [19]. All hydrogen atoms were located in
˚
H 0.93Á0.97 A) and
their calculated positions (Cꢀ
/
/
refined using a riding model. Atomic scattering factors
are from the ‘International Tables for X-ray Crystal-
lography’ [19] and molecular graphics from PLA-
TON2001 [20]. A summary of the crystal data,
experimental details and refinement results are listed in
Table 1.
(Feꢁ/Fc, E1/2
ꢂ0.173 V in DMF); under the experi-
/
mental conditions used (scan rate 100 mV sꢀ1). Et4N-
ClO4 (0.1 M) was used as supporting electrolyte, the
solutions were 1ꢃ
10ꢀ3 M in complex, and all experi-
ments were carried out under a dinitrogen atmosphere.
/
2.1. Preparation of the complexes and ligands
The ligands HFoATP4DH, 1, HFoATP4Me, 2,
HFoATP4Et, 3, were prepared according to the method
described previously [15]. The yields and melting points
Table 1
Crystallographic data for the X-ray diffraction studies for
[Pd(FoATP4NEt)2]
are as follows: 1, 40.5%, m.p.ꢂ
m.p.ꢂ216 8C; 3, 67.7%, m.p.ꢂ212 8C.
[Pd(FoATP4DH)2], 4, [Pd(FoATP4Me)2],
[Pd(FoATP4Et)2], 6, were prepared as follows: to a
solution of 1.5 mmol K2PdCl4 in 10 ml of distilled water
was added 3.2 mmol of a thiosemicarbazone (i.e., 1, 2,
/
219 8C; 2, 42.5%,
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
C30H36N10O2PdS2
739.25
293(2)
/
/
5,
˚
Radiation (A)
Mo Ka, lꢂ0.71073
/
Crystal system
Space group
Monoclinic
P21/n
or 3). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 8.0Á9.0 by
the addition of aqueous 1.0 M NH3, and the reaction
mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. The
/
Unit cell dimensions
˚
a (A)
˚
11.0670(10)
14.0970(10)
11.690(3)
115.350(10)
1648.2(5)
4
b (A)
˚
c (A)
resulting orangeÁred powder was filtered off, washed
/
b
with cold methanol and ether, dried in vacuo over silica
gel, and finally redried at 70 8C in vacuo over P4O10.
Melting points, percentage yields and elemental analyses
are as follows: 4, m.p., 234 8C; yield 95%; %Found: C,
45.7; H, 4.1; N, 20.5; S, 9.4; Pd, 15.6; Cl, 0.0;%Calcd. for
C28H35N10O2S2Pd: C, 45.6; H, 4.2; N, 20.5; S, 9.6; Pd,
15.3; Cl, 0.0%; 5, m.p., 235 8C; yield 92%; %Found: C,
47.3; H, 5.6; N, 19.7; S, 9.0; Pd, 15.6; Cl, 0.0;%Calcd. for
C29H34N10O2S2Pd: C, 47.2; H, 5.2; N, 19.7; S, 9.1; Pd,
15.6; Cl, 0.0%; 6, m.p., 230 8C; yield 77%; %Found: C,
48.8; H, 4.9; N, 18.9; S, 8.7; Pd, 14.4; Cl, 0.0;%Calcd. for
C30H36N10O2Pd: C, 48.8; H, 5.0; N, 19.0; S, 9.6; Pd,
14.4; Cl, 0.0.
3
˚
V (A )
Z
Dcalc (mg mꢀ3
)
0.427
0.316
214
Absorption coefficient (mmꢀ1
F(0 0 0)
)
Crystal size (mm)
u range for data collection
Limiting indices
0.20ꢃ
2.12Á25.00
00h 013,
10k 014,
130l 012
/
0.20ꢃ
/
0.30
/
/
/
ꢀ
ꢀ/
/
/
/
/
/
Reflections collected/unique
3230/2817 [Rint
97.10%
ꢂ/0.0555]
Completeness to uꢂ
Refinement method
/25.00
Full-matrix least-squares on
F2
Data/restraints/parameters
Final R indices [I ꢀ2s(I)]
R indices (all data)
Goodness-of-fit on F2
2817/0/213
/
R1ꢂ
R1ꢂ
1.009
0.395 and ꢀ0.437
/
0.0639, wR2ꢂ
/
0.1074
0.1334
/
0.1404, wR2ꢂ
/
2.2. X-ray crystallography
Largest difference peak and hole
ꢀ3
/
Slow evaporation of a dilute 1:1 by volume CH3CN/
CH3OH solution provided an orange prismatic crystal
˚
(eA
)