ChemComm
Communication
Scheme 2 Intramolecular double acylation.
symmetrical benzils 1a and 1e was carried out under standard
conditions (Scheme 2). The two diketones reacted independently
with 2a to yield products 3aa and 3ea in 91% and 85% yields,
respectively, whereas cross-products were not detected.
Compared to benzil derivatives, aliphatic 1,2-diketones gave
the expected product in lower yields (Scheme 3). Thus, the
double acylation product 3ia was obtained in only 16% yield by the
reaction of biacetyl (1i) with enone 2a, but the corresponding
hydroacylation product was not formed. Interestingly, the reaction
of cyclohexane-1,2-dione (1j) gave 8-membered triketone 3ja in 27%
yield. It is noteworthy that this ring-expansion reaction showed a
striking contrast to the thiazolium carbene-catalyzed ring-opening
hydroacylation of chalcones with 1j in EtOH.6a
Scheme 4 Proposed mechanism.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology of Japan.
Notes and references
A plausible mechanism of the double acylation is proposed
in Scheme 4. Addition of carbene A to benzil (1), followed by
migration of the benzoyl group to the alkoxide moiety, yields
the acylated Breslow intermediate G. Michael addition of G to
enone 2 generates zwitterion H. Then, intramolecular abstraction of
the benzoyl group by enolate results in the formation of product 3
and regeneration of A. Although this mechanism is analogous to
that of Stetter reaction, suppression of the benzoyl group elimination
from the intermediate F or G in anhydrous aprotic solvent would
lead to double acylation. The low yields with aliphatic 1,2-diketones
may be caused by inefficient alkanoyl migration in F as well as
enolization of the diketone.
In summary, we have succeeded in the extension of Stetter
reaction, i.e., thiazolium carbene-catalyzed reaction of benzils
with enones gave double acylation products in good yields,
whereas hydroacylation by classical Stetter reaction was completely
excluded. These results provide new potential for NHC-catalyzed
reaction, by allowing the insertion of activated carbon–carbon
multiple bonds into other acyl compounds than aldehydes.
1 For reviews, see: (a) M. H. Hopkinson, C. Richter, M. Schedler and
F. Glorius, Nature, 2014, 510, 485–496; (b) J. Izquierdo, G. E. Hutson,
D. T. Cohen and K. A. Scheidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51,
1686–11698; (c) A. Grossmann and D. Enders, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2012, 51, 314–325; (d) J. Mahatthananchai and J. W. Bode, Chem.
Sci., 2012, 3, 192–197; (e) X. Bugaut and F. Glorius, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2012, 41, 3511–3522; ( f ) V. Nair, R. S. Menon, A. T. Biju, C. R. Sinu,
R. R. Paul, A. Jose and V. Streekumar, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40,
5336–5346; (g) A. T. Biju, N. Kuhl and F. Glorius, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2011, 44, 1182–1195; (h) P.-C. Chiang and J. W. Bode, TCI MAIL,
2011, 149, 2–17; (i) E. M. Phillips, A. Chan and K. A. Scheidt,
Aldrichimica Acta, 2009, 42, 55–66; ( j) D. Enders, O. Niemeier and
A. Henseler, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5606–5655.
2 (a) M. Schedler, N. E. Wurz, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, Org. Lett.,
2014, 16, 3134–3137; (b) T. Kato, Y. Ota, S. Matsuoka, K. Takagi and
M. Suzuki, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 8739–8747; (c) S. Matsuoka,
S. Namera, A. Washio, K. Takagi and M. Suzuki, Org. Lett., 2013, 15,
5916–5919; (d) B. Maji, M. Horn and H. Mayr, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2012, 51, 6231–6235; (e) A. T. Biju, M. Padmanaban, N. E. Wurz and
F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8412–8415; ( f ) S. Matsuoka,
Y. Ota, A. Washio, A. Katada, K. Ichioka, K. Takagi and M. Suzuki, Org.
Lett., 2011, 13, 3722–3725; (g) C. Fischer, S. W. Smith, D. A. Powell and
G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1472–1473.
3 Review, see: (a) M. Christmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44,
2632–2634; (b) H. Stetter and H. Kuhlmann, Org. React., 1991, 40,
407–496; (c) H. Stetter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1976, 15,
639–647; (d) H. Stetter and M. Schreckenberg, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1973, 12, 81.
4 A. E. Mattson, A. R. Bharadwaj and K. S. Scheidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 2314–2315.
5 M. C. Myers, A. R. Bharadwaj, B. C. Milgram and K. A. Scheidt, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 14675–14680.
6 (a) O. Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, P. P. Giovannini, A. Massi and
S. Pacifico, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 8437–8444; (b) O. Bortolini,
G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, P. P. Giovannini, V. Venturi, S. Pacifico and
A. Massi, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 8110–8115.
7 V. Nair, S. Vellalath, M. Poonoth, R. Mohan and E. Suresh, Org. Lett.,
2006, 8, 507–509.
8 V. Bertolasi, O. Bortolini, A. Donvito, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo,
P. P. Giovannini, A. Massi and S. Pacifico, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2012, 10, 6579–6586.
Scheme 3 Reaction of aliphatic 1,2-diketone.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 12285--12288 | 12287