1192
J. Pohlmann et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1189–1192
Table 3. IC50 and MIC values of piperidinedione derivatives
R2
O
R1
O
O
O
NH
N
H
N
H
O
Compound
R1
R2
IC50 (nM)
MIC (lg/mL)
E. coli
S. aureus
E. coli HN818
E. coli Neumann
S. aureus 133
S. pneumoniae G9A
16a
16b
16c
H
H
>300
>300
295
>1000
>1000
>1000
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
CH3
H
H
CH3
linked substituents were better tolerated. Compounds
12d–f were similar potent against the S. aureus enzyme
as unsubstituted moiramide B. The 4-(S)-methyl group
of the pyrrolidinedione moiety seems to be essential
for activity. Removal of that methyl group (13) or
replacement by an ethyl group (14) caused total loss of
activity. Only dimethyl derivative 15 still showed IC50
values at the concentration range tested. However, the
potency was 10-fold reduced compared to parent com-
pound moiramide B. Six-membered piperidinedione
derivatives were evaluated, as well (Table 3). Neither
nonmethylated derivative 16a, nor 4-methyl compound
16b showed any activity. Only 5-methyl derivative 16c
was slightly active in the E. coli enzyme assay.
subunits that have not been addressed in this study, will
show, if a significant improvement of potency compared
to the natural products is feasible. A detailed under-
standing of the structure–activity relationship for all
subunits will allow a complete evaluation of the poten-
tial of pyrrolidinediones as a new structural class with
a novel mode of action for antibacterial therapy.
References and notes
1. Gold, H. S.; Moellering, R. C. New Engl. J. Med. 1996,
335, 1445.
2. Finch, R. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002, 8(Suppl. 3), 21.
3. Hosein, I. K.; Hill, D. W.; Jenkins, L. E.; Magee, J. T.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 90S, Symposium Supplement.
4. Livermore, D. M. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36(Suppl. 1),
S11.
In summary, the structure–activity relationship for the
fatty acid side chain and the pyrrolidinedione moiety re-
flect that these two groups play entirely different roles in
binding to the target.
5. Needham, J.; Kelly, M. T.; Ishige, M.; Andersen, R. J.
J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2058.
6. Fredenhagen, A.; Tamura, S. Y.; Kenny, P. T. M.;
Komura, H.; Naya, Y.; Nakanishi, K.; Nishiyama, K.;
Sugiura, M.; Kita, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4409.
7. Oclarit, J. M.; Okada, H.; Ohta, S.; Kaminura, K.;
Yamaoka, Y.; Iizuka, T.; Miyashiro, S.; Ikegami, S.
Microbios. 1994, 78, 7.
8. Freiberg, C.; Brunner, N. A.; Schiffer, G.; Lampe, T.;
Pohlmann, J.; Brands, M.; Raabe, M.; Ha¨bich, D.;
Ziegelbauer, K. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 26066.
9. McWorther, W.; Fredenhagen, A.; Nakanishi, K.; Kom-
ura, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 299.
10. Rao, A. V. R.; Singh, A. K.; Varaprasad, Ch. V. N. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4393.
A high degree of variability was found for the fatty acid
side chain, which apparently is not involved in pivotal
binding interactions with the bacterial acetyl-CoA
carboxylase. Nevertheless, despite limited influence on
enzyme inhibition, a significant impact on antibacterial
activity was observed for the side chain variations. Cell
penetration issues appear to be responsible for this ef-
fect. Consequently, variation of the fatty acid side chain
should allow optimization of the physicochemical pro-
file during the drug discovery process. On the other
hand, only limited variations were tolerated in the pyr-
rolidinedione head group. Most derivatives showed a
significant decrease or even total loss of target- and anti-
bacterial activity. Only few selected substituents at the
pyrrolidinedione nitrogen atom were not detrimental
for inhibitory potency. These results indicate major
relevance of the 4-(S)-methyl pyrrolidinedione group
for efficient target binding. Synthetic variation of the
b-amino acid and the b-ketoamide moiety, the two
11. Dixon, D. J.; Davies, S. G. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1797.
12. Davies, S. G.; Dixon, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1998, 2635.
´
13. Consonni, P.; Favara, D.; Omodei-Sale, A.; Bartolini, G.;
Ricci, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1983, 967.
14. For carboxyltransferase assay conditions, see: Blanchard,
C. Z.; Waldrop, G. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 19140,
MIC values were determined according to NCCLS
guidelines.