Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.9 (2003)
859
5, respectively. On the contrary, the cycloreversion quantum
yields are strongly affected by the substituents at the reactive
carbons. As shown in Table 1, the cycloreversion quantum
yields of 1 and 4 are 0.59 and 0.41, which are 1.7 and 30 times
larger than those of 2 and 5, respectively. The cyano groups in-
crease the cycloreversion quantum yields. The cycloreversion
quantum yield of 1 is larger than the cyclization quantum yield
of 1. Consequently, we can control the cycloreversion reactivity
of the diarylethenes as much as 24000 times for 4 and 6.
The theoretical calculations in excited states of a model
system of the diarylethenes (scheme in Figure 2) were carried
out with Gaussian 9813 and GAMESS14 program packages in
order to confirm the substituent effect.15 As shown in Figure
2, upon excitation to the allowed 1B state which is so close
in energy to the 2A state, very fast internal conversion to the
2A state is assumed. The excited state potential energy surface
possesses two minima (2Ac and 2Ao) in the proximity of the
closed-ring isomer at the transition state. Consequently, an en-
ergy barrier exists on the pathway from closed- to open-ring iso-
mers in excited state. When the 2Ac point is populated, the cy-
cloreversion quantum yield depends on the ability of the system
to overcome the energy barrier between 2Ac and 2Ao. The bar-
rier is related to the energy difference, ÁE (¼ E(2Ao) À
E(2Ac)). When the energy difference is small, the barrier is ex-
pected to become small. The calculated energy differences were
1.1,16 5.9, and 13.9 kcal molÀ1 for the cyano, methyl, and me-
thoxy derivatives, respectively.15 The order of ÁE, which de-
pended on the substituents, is well correlated with that of the cy-
cloreversion quantum yields obtained experimentally.
The present work was partly supported by the Grant-in-
Aids for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 15033252
and 12131211) and a Grant-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE
Program, ‘‘Functional Innovation of Molecular Informatics’’
from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan. We thank NIPPON ZEON CO., Ltd. for
their supply of octafluorocyclopentene.
References and Notes
1
H. Durr and H. Bouas-Laurent, in ‘‘Photochromism: Mole-
¨
cules and Systems,’’ Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990).
M. Irie, Chem. Rev., 100, 1685 (2000).
M. Irie and K. Uchida, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 71, 985 (1998).
K. Shibata, S. Kobatake, and M. Irie, Chem. Lett., 2001, 618.
K. Morimitsu, K. Shibata, S. Kobatake, and M. Irie, J. Org.
Chem., 67, 4574 (2002).
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1a: colorless crystals: mp 232.5–233.5 ꢀC; 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3) ꢁ 7.5–8.2 (m, 8H); MS m=z (Mþ) 490.
Anal. Calcd. for C23H8F6N2S2: C, 56.33; H, 1.64; N,
5.71%. Found: C, 56.30; H, 1.60; N, 5.69%.
4a: pale yellow colored crystals: mp 165.5–166.5 ꢀC; 1H
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) ꢁ 7.4–7.7 (m, 12H); MS m=z (Mþ)
542. Anal. Calcd. for C27H12F6N2S2: C, 59.77; H, 2.23; N,
5.16%. Found: C, 59.91; H, 2.31; N, 5.22%.
3a: colorless crystals: mp 171.9–172.5 ꢀC; 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3) ꢁ 3.6 (s, 6H), 7.1–7.6 (m, 8H); MS m=z
(Mþ) 500. Anal. Calcd. for C23H14F6O2S2: C, 55.20; H,
2.82%. Found: C, 55.17; H, 2.81%.
1b was isolated by HPLC(silica gel; hexane/ethyl acetate =
91/9 as the eluent), 1a and 1b were eluted at 52 and 68 min,
respectively.
Table 1. Absorption maxima of closed-ring isomers and quan-
tum yields in hexane
b
c
ꢀ
max/nma
Èo!c
Èc!o
0.59
0.35
1
496
517
547
545
575
625
0.28
0.35
0.34
0.42
0.59
0.44
211
3
10 4b was isolated by HPLC(silica gel; hexane/ethyl acetate =
97/3 as the eluent), 4a and 4b were eluted at 18 and 28 min,
respectively.
11 K. Uchida, E. Tsuchida, Y. Aoi, S. Nakamura, and M. Irie,
Chem. Lett., 1999, 63.
0.030
0.41
0.013
4
512
64
1:7 Â 10À5
aAbsorption maxima of the closed-ring isomers in the visible
12 M. Irie, T. Lifka, S. Kobatake, and N. Kato, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 122, 4871 (2000).
region;
bPhotocyclization
quantum
yields;
cPhotocycloreversion quantum yields.
13 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M.
A. Robb, J. R. Cheesemann, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A., Jr.
Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J.
M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O.
Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B.
Mennuci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski,
G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K.
Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J.
Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, A. G. Baboul, B. B. Stefanov, G.
Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, C. Y. Peng, A.
Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, C. Gonzalez,
M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, J. A. Pople, ‘‘Gaussian 98,
Revision A. 9,’’ Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA (1998).
14 M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M.
S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A.
Nguyen, S. J. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, and J. A.
Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem., 14, 1347 (1993).
15 D. Guillaumont, T. Kobayashi, K. Kanda, H. Miyasaka, K.
Uchida, S. Kobatake, K. Shibata, S. Nakamura, and M. Irie,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 7222 (2002).
1B
2A
2Ao
2Ac
h
ν
1A
Vis.
R
R
R
R
H3C
H3C
CH3
CH3
S
S
S
S
closed-ring isomer
open-ring isomer
Distance between the reactive carbons
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the potential ener-
gy profile of the model system (R=CN, Me, OMe).
16 The value was determined for 1,2-bis(2-cyano-5-phenyl-3-
thienyl)ethene in this work.
Published on the web (Advance View) August 25, 2003; DOI 10.1246/cl.2003.858