1280
M. E. Krafft et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1277–1280
2. Darzens, G. Compt. Rend. 1911, 151, 883.
3. Schwartz, A.; Madan, P. B.; Mohacsi, E.; O’Brien, J. P.; Todaro, L. J.; Coffen, D. L. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 851.
to form the cis-epoxide. This indicates there is a minimal steric
interaction between the alkoxyl group of the ester and the alkene
substituents as the cis-epoxide is still formed under the reaction
conditions. The presence of the tert-butyl group, in the reaction
4. Aldous, D. J.; Dalencon, A. J.; Steel, P. G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1159.
5. (a) Kinoshita, H.; Ihoriya, A.; Ju-ichi, M.; Kimachi, T. Synlett 2010, 2330; (b) Lui,
W.-J.; Lv, B.-D.; Gong, L.-Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6503; (c) Aggarwal,
V. K.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Fuentes, D.; Harvey, J. N.; Hynd, G.; Ohara, D.; Picoul,
W.; Robiette, R.; Smith, C.; Vasse, J.-L.; Winn, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
2105.
6. (a) Moran-Ramallal, R.; Liz, R.; Gotor, V. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 6614; (b)
Atsushi, T.; Kawashima, N.; Sato, K.; Omote, M.; Ando, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 4246; (c) Valdez, S. C.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14638; (d)
Akiyama, T.; Suzuki, T.; Mori, K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2445; For review see: (e)
Sweeney, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4911.
7. Wang, Y.-C.; Li, C.-L.; Tseng, H.-L.; Chuang, S.-C.; Yan, T.-H. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3249.
8. Corey, E. J.; Choi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2857.
9. Concellon, J. M.; Huerta, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1931.
10. Borch, R. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3761.
11. Field, L.; Carlile, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3170.
of
a-bromopinacolone, increases this steric interaction resulting
in much greater selectivity for the more thermodynamically stable
trans-epoxide in the halide displacement step. Thus the geometrical
outcome of epoxide formation is strongly influenced by the steric
nature of the enolate partner, substitution on the unsaturated
carbonyl electrophile has minimal impact.
In conclusion we have successfully developed the reaction con-
ditions for the Darzens condensation of a,b-unsaturated aldehyde
and ketone electrophiles, which can be applied to a range of
substrates to afford the desired epoxide in good yields. Where
a-bromo esters were employed, little selectivity for the cis or
trans-epoxide was observed, however, it was possible to bias the
reaction to give predominantly the trans -form when a t-butyl
ketone was employed.
12. Abdel-Magid, A.; Prigden, L. N.; Eggleston, D. S.; Lantos, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 4595.
13. General procedure: A solution of LiHMDS (1.0 equiv, 2 mmol., 2 mL–1.0 M soln
in THF) was cooled to ꢀ78 °C under a positive pressure of argon before the drop
wise addition of ethyl bromoacetate (1.0 equiv, 2 mmol, 0.22 mL). After 15 min
the electrophile (1.0 equiv, 2 mmol) was added drop wise over 5 min and the
reaction allowed to warm to 25 °C where it was stirred for 2 h. The reaction
was quenched through the addition of 10% HCl (0.4 mL) before dilution with
Et2O (5 mL) and washing of the organic phase with 10% HCl (1.6 mL), H2O
(2 mL) and brine (2 mL). Drying (MgSO4) and solvent removal afforded the
crude product as orange oil. Purification was performed by silica column
chromatography (Hexane/EtOAc, 10:1, Rf ꢁ0.4).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the MDS Research Foundation and the NSF
for financial support, and Steven E. Frietag for the NOE spectral
data.
14. Arai, S.; Shirai, Y.; Ishida, T.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6375.
15. Peppe, C.; das Chagas, R. P. Synlett 2006, 605.
References and notes
1. Erlenmeyer, E. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1892, 271, 137.