C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
equilibrium between 5 and 8; however, stoichiometric quantities
of sodium methoxide did (8:5 ) 100:1 at equilibrium, 10 equiv of
NaOCH3).
In an effort to explore the potentially greater generality of
nucleophilic additions to R,â-unsaturated nitrones, the nitrones
derived from the condensation of N-phenylhydroxylamine with (E)-
cinnamaldehyde13 and (E)-4,4-dimethyl-2-pentenal were prepared
and subjected to conditions leading to adduct formation with 5
described above. However, in neither case was nucleophilic addition
observed. By and large, the acyclic R,â-unsaturated nitrones were
found to be unreactive. These observations might point toward the
importance of the formation of the aromatic indole structure in
5 f 8, a driving force that would be lacking in acyclic R,â-
unsaturated nitrones. Thus far, our studies have identified the
3-alkylidene-3H-indole 1-oxide group as both necessary and
sufficient to function as a novel Michael acceptor group for oxygen-
and sulfur-based nucleophiles. There is as yet no evidence that this
reactivity plays any role in the biological activity of 1 (or 2),
although our findings are certainly intriguing in this regard.
Thiols were also found to add cleanly and reversibly to 5 in the
presence of a base, but not without. For example, addition of
4-methoxybenzenethiol (1.2 equiv) to 5 in the presence of triethy-
lamine-d15 (0.2 equiv) in CD2Cl2 at 23 °C afforded the 1,5-adduct
(8, Nu ) SC6H4OCH3) quickly (<15 min) and quantitatively (1H
NMR analysis). Under similar conditions, addition of thiophenol
(8, Nu ) SC6H5) proceeded to afford a 9:1 ratio of adduct to starting
material, whereas the ratio was >98:2 at -40 °C (1H NMR analysis,
k8f5 ) 0.25 ( 0.15 s-1 M-1 at -40 °C).10 Neither addition was
significantly affected by the presence (or absence) of oxygen. The
1,5-adducts were highly labile toward silica gel, to the extent that
they could not be purified chromatographically without inducing
complete reversal (8 f 5).
Other transformations of 5 of note include its reduction with
NaBH4 in methanol (8, Nu ) H, 89%) and its photochemical
rearrangement under ambient light or, more rapidly, upon direct
irradiation (200 W Hg lamp) to form the lactam 9 (eq 2, 67%).11
The latter transformation may involve an intermediate oxaziridine,
as is frequently proposed in the photochemistry of nitrones.12
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Shaw G. Huang and William
E. Collins for assistance with NMR analysis, and Andrew Haidle
for solving the crystal structure of 5. S.B.H. acknowledges the
National Science Foundation for a predoctoral fellowship. This work
was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the preparation of all new compounds, tabulated spectral data, and X-ray
data of 5 (PDF and CIF). This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) For leading references, see: (a) Adams, J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002,
6, 493. (b) Lecaille, F.; Kaleta, J.; Bro¨mme, D. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102,
4459.
(2) Isolation of avrainvillamide: (a) Fenical, W.; Jensen, P.; Cheng, X. C.
Avrainvillamide, a Cytotoxic Marine Natural Product, and the Derivatives
thereof. U.S. Patent 6,066,635, 2000. (b) Sugie, Y.; Hirai, H.; Inagaki,
T.; Ishiguro, M.; Kim, Y.; Kohima, Y.; Sakakibara, T.; Sakemi, S.;
Sugiura, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Brennan, L.; Buignan, J.; Huang, L.; Sutcliffe,
J.; Kojima, N. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 911. Isolation of stephacidins A and
B: (c) Qian-Cutrone, J.; Huang, S.; Shu, Y.; Vyas, D.; Fairchild, C.;
Menendez, A.; Krampitz, K.; Dalterio, R.; Klohr, S.; Gao, Q. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 14556. (d) An alternative sequence of formation of bonds
a and b was recently proposed for the biosynthesis of 2 from 1,
contemporous with and independent of the present work: Nussbaum, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3068.
(3) For prior syntheses of this function see: (a) Colonna, M.; Bruni, P. Gazz.
Chim. Ital. 1967, 97, 1569. (b) Tosi, G.; Cardellini, L.; Cardillo, B.;
Bocelli, G. Monatsh. Chem. 1987, 118, 369.
(4) (a) Johnson, C. R.; Adams, J. P.; Braun, M. P.; Senanayake, C. B. W.;
Wovkulich, P. M.; Uskokovic, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 917.
(b) Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Chem.-Eur J. 2000,
6, 3991.
(5) Lissel, M.; Neumann, B.; Schmidt, S. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 263.
(6) (a) Ishiyama, T.; Murata, M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7508.
(b) Wolfe, J. P.; Singer, R. A.; Yang, B. H.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 9550.
(7) Banwell, M. G.; Kelly, B. D.; Kokas, O. J.; Lupton, D. W. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2497.
(8) Knochel, P.; Rao, C. J. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 29.
(9) For discussion of 1,3-addition of nucleophiles to nitrones, see: (a) Bloch,
R. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1407. (b) Lombardo, M.; Trombini, C. Synthesis
2000, 6, 759.
(10) Rate determined by inversion-transfer, analyzed with the CIFIT pro-
gram: Bain, A. D.; Kramer, J. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1996, 118a, 21.
(11) 1-D NOESY experiments confirmed the stereochemistry of the exocyclic
double bond to be that shown.
In contrast to the facile addition of oxygen- and sulfur-based
nucleophiles that was observed, all potential nitrogen-based nu-
cleophiles examined to date (e.g., n-propylamine, formamide,
2-pyrrolidinone, 2-hydroxypyridine, 2-trimethylsilyloxypyrroline)
have failed to produce detectable levels of adducts in reactions with
5. Given the steric hindrance about the â-position of 5 (see Figure
1), it is remarkable that any nucleophilic addition occurs at all.
The failure of amides to add to 5 is of interest given the proposed
dimerization of 1 to form 2; however, the differences between our
model system and 1 caution against overinterpretation of this result.
In particular, analysis of X-ray data for 2 suggests that there is a
stabilizing hydrogen bond between the secondary lactam NH group
and the carbonyl oxygen of the adjacent amide; this would be
replaced by a repulsive interaction with a methyl group in our model
system. Dimerization of 1 to form 2 has been proposed to involve
initial formation of bond b in structure 2 and not bond a (as results
here might imply, see also ref 2d); however, it should be emphasized
that the transformation of 1 to 2 has not yet been demonstrated to
occur at all.2c
(12) (a) Spence, G. G.; Taylor, E. C.; Buchart, O. Chem. ReV. 1970, 70, 231.
Similar fragmentations have been reported. (b) Suginome, H.; Furukawa,
K.; Orito, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 917. (c) Page, P. C.;
Limousin, C.; Murrell, V. L. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7787.
(13) Utzinger, G. E.; Regenass, F. A. HelV. Chim. Acta 1954, 37, 1892.
JA0372006
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 40, 2003 12081