Binding of Me4N+ to Aromatic Hosts
side chains do not improve cation binding by substantial
amounts. In fact, with one exception, all ligands show
weaker binding than the parent unsubstituted tetraester
DXPDA. Introduction of four phenolic oxygen function-
alities in the xylylene moieties of DXPDA is expected to
raise the electronic density and, consequently, it may
enhance the binding capacity of the host toward the
cationic guest. Likewise, the introduction of benzyl side
chains may enhance the association by incrementing the
number of binding goups. In contrast, it is easily noted
that neither one is the case, since the tetrabenzyloxy-
substituted 17 shows a binding free energy value 1.5 kJ
mol-1 smaller than that of DXPDA. On the other hand,
comparison between the corresponding open-chain “half-
molecules”, the unsubstituted XPDA and the dibenzyloxy-
substituted 33, does not highlight any appreciable dif-
ference in binding to TMA, indicating that neither the
electron-donating phenolic oxygens nor the benzylic side
chains induce any increase in binding capacity. This
evidence confirms the prediction made, in choosing the
dihydroxyterephthalate reagent for the synthesis of the
sidearmed macrocyclic hosts, that binding properties
would not be affected by electronic factors. As expected,
the free energy values for XPDA and 33 are smaller than
those of their macrocyclic counterparts; this reflects the
larger number of binding groups and some degree of
preorganization that the macrocyclic structures, although
flexible, possess compared to their open-chain analogues;
however, the drop in binding strength observed for 17
with respect to DXPDA, a drop lacking for the open-chain
ligands, points to a binding hindrance affecting the
substituted macrocycles, which may be steric and/or
conformational in origin. Taking into account such a
binding inhibition, then side chains possessing an in-
creasing number of oxyethylene units do increase the
binding strength of the macrocyclic hosts as in the open-
chain series. Thus, addition of one oxyethylene unit to
the side chains of 17 raises the binding free energy by
0.46 kJ mol-1 for 15, a value that is nearly unaffected
by replacement of the terminal phenyl groups with
methyl groups as in 13, suggesting that phenyl end
groups cannot easily achieve a cooperative binding
conformation. Instead, three oxyethylene units in 14 raise
the binding free energy by 1.45 kJ mol-1 with respect to
17 and by 1.1 kJ mol-1 with respect to its lower homo-
logue 13, bringing a contribution significantly larger than
that of one single unit. However, while in 13 the four
independent oxyethylene units can probably arrange into
a binding conformation around the cation, thus exerting
their full contribution, this cannot obviously be achieved
by the total 12 oxyethylene units of which 14 is endowed,
necessarily bringing in only a partial contribution. In
terms of additivity of contributions, 13 and 15 show
binding free energy increments very similar to that of
the open-chain counterpart endowed with the same
number of ether units (3), whereas 14 exhibits a binding
increment slightly larger than that of the corresponding
open-chain ligand possessing only half of its oxyethylene
units (4). The glycerol derivative 16 is the only host for
which a net increase in binding free energy is observed
with respect to the parent DXPDA. This may be ascribed
to the branching of the side chains, which may allow for
a better adaptment to the guest, but the improvement
in binding energy, 2 kJ mol-1 with respect to 17 and less
than 0.5 kJ mol-1 with respect to DXPDA, is indeed very
modest compared to the complexity of the structure and
the number of binding groups featured. In conclusion,
polyether chains are intrinsically beneficial as coopera-
tive binding side chains, but they introduce steric/
conformational constraints in the macrocyclic tetraester
that override any advantages gained in binding strength.
Con clu sion . From a systematic investigation of the
binding contribution exerted by polyether side chains on
the interaction of the tetramethylammonium cation with
phanic receptors, the following conclusions have been
drawn: (a) binding of the guest is primarily due to the
aromatic moieties of the receptors; ether groups provide
minor but cooperative contributions whenever they can
achieve a binding arrangement around the cation; (b)
contributions of ether groups are additive for open-chain
hosts, with exponentially growing increments of binding
free energy, whereas participation appears to be strongly
affected by steric and/or conformational constraints for
macrocyclic sidearmed hosts; (c) in contrast to aromatic
rings, polyether chains preferentially bind to water than
to TMA, showing binding free energy increments linearly
additive; (d) for the set of phanic esters investigated,
water and TMA independently interact with polyether
chains and aromatic binding sites respectively in an
essentially noncompetitive fashion; (e) ester groups par-
ticipate in binding of TMA through the carbonyl and of
water through the alcoholic oxygen. In summary, the
contribution from the ether oxygen donors of polyether
chains to the binding of TMA to aromatic hosts could be
reliably assessed on a quantitative basis using a set of
ligands featuring a systematic variation of substituents.
Results confirm that the binding energies expected from
gas-phase data for the interaction between TMA and
oxygen donors vanish to a large extent in solution, in
contrast to the cation-π interaction established with
aromatic donors, which seems to suffer to a minor extent
from the transfer to the condensed phase.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Syn th esis of 1-[4-(2-Oxop r op yl)p h en yl]p r op a n -2-on e,
10. Copper(I) cyanide (582 mg, 6.50 mmol) was suspended in
dry tetrahydrofuran (13 mL) and cooled to -78 °C. A 1.6 M
solution of methyllithium in diethyl ether (3.55 mL, 6.58 mmol)
was added dropwise and the mixture allowed to warm to 0 °C
and cooled again to -78 °C. A solution of (4-chlorocarbonyl-
methylphenyl)acetyl chloride (657 mg, 2.84 mmol) in dry
tetrahydrofuran (7 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture
stirred at 0 °C for further 30 min. Methanol (10 mL) was added
and the mixture poured into water (20 mL). The aqueous layer
was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 30 mL). The com-
bined organic layer was washed with water (20 mL) and dried
(Na2SO4) and the solvent removed under reduced pressure.
Purification by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl
acetate 3:2), gave 253 mg of 10 as a white solid (47% yield).
Mp: 52-53°C (lit.13 mp: 46-47 °C). Elemental analysis: calcd,
1
C 75.75, H 7.42; found C 76.02, H 7.51. H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 2.15 (s, 6H), 3.68 (s, 4H), 7.17 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (50
MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.3, 50.5, 129.8, 133.06, 206.3. MS-EI: m/z
(%) 191 (11), 190 (12) [M+], 148 (71), 106 (12), 105 (100), 104
(49), 103 (70), 91 (42), 89 (11), 84 (17), 78 (44), 77 (78), 63 (24),
52 (14), 51 (29), 50 (21).
Syn th esis of [2,5-Bis(2-eth oxyeth oxy)-4-h yd r oxym eth -
ylp h en yl]m eth a n ol, 24. Gen er a l Meth od B. Compound 18
(3.46 g, 13.6 mmol), Cs2CO3 (30 g, 92 mmol), and methane-
sulfonic acid 2-ethoxyethyl ester (4.58 g, 27.2 mmol) were
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 21, 2003 8155