R-Alkylidene-â-lactones are important skeletons in some
biologically active natural products12 and considered as useful
building blocks in organic synthesis.13 Besides the methods
described above, R-alkylidene-â-lactones have also been
prepared via [2 + 2] cycloaddition of ketenes and carbonyl
compounds,14 lactonization of â-hydroxy carboxylic acids
or derivatives,15 and deoxygenation of â-peroxylactones.16
However, these known pioneering methods may, in some
cases, suffer from lengthy procedures, harsh conditions, or
low yields. Thus, new and efficient methodologies for
R-alkylidene-â-lactones are still desirable. In this paper, we
report a general and high-yielding Pd-catalyzed carbonylation
of propargylic alcohols with various structural patterns
forming (Z)-R-chloroalkylidene-â-lactones selectively.
Our initial observation of achieving (Z)-R-chloroalky-
lidene-â-lactone 2a involved the reaction of 1a, 3 equiv of
CuCl2, and CO (1 atm) with PdCl2 as the catalyst at 20 °C
in PhH, but the yield was only 29% (entry 1, Table 1). With
and error, we found that the solvent, CO pressure, and
temperature are crucial factors, and the best reaction condi-
tions are 10 mol % PdCl2, 5 equiv of CuCl2, and CO (20
atm) in THF at 30 °C for 4 h. Under these reaction
conditions, (Z)-2a was isolated in 86% yield (entry 3, Table
1).
To explore the scope of this reaction, the effect of
substituents R1 and R2 was investigated. As can be seen from
Table 2, R1 can be an alkyl group or an aryl group, including
Table 2. PdCl2-Catalyzed Cyclocarbonylation of Secondary
Propargylic Alcohols with 5 Equiv of CuCl2
entry
R1
R2
C2H5
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
Me
n-C3H7
n-C5H11
i-Pr
product isolated yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6a
7
8
9
10
11a
12
13a
14
15a
16a
n-C6H13
n-C5H11
n-C3H7
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
n-C4H9
t-Bu
(Z)-2a
(Z)-2b
(Z)-2c
(Z)-2d
(Z)-2e
(Z)-2f
(Z)-2g
(Z)-2h
(Z)-2i
(Z)-2j
(Z)-2k
(Z)-2l
(Z)-2m
(Z)-2n
(Z)-2o
(Z)-2p
86
76
74
64
72
67
71
90
82
89
91
81
78
66
52
63
Table 1. PdCl2-Catalyzed Cyclocarbonylation of
Undec-4-yn-3-ol 1a with CuCl2
i-Bu
cyclohexyl
n-C4H9
i-Pr
i-Bu
cyclohexyl
CO
CuCl2
temp
(°C)
time
(h)
yielda
(%)
entry
(atm)
(equiv)
solvent
Ph
Ph
Ph
1
2
3
4
1
15
20
20
3
3
5
5
PhH
THF
THF
THF
20
25
30
70
18
17
4
29
35
86
31
PhCH2CH2 i-Pr
PhCH2CH2 i-Bu
PhCH2CH2 cyclohexyl
4
a Isolated yield.
a Reaction time was 6 h.
the pressure of CO being 15 atm, the yield was not
dramatically improved (entries 2, Table 1). After some trial
tBu, while the R2 group should be an alkyl group. The four-
membered structures of (Z)-2 were established by a single-
crystal X-ray diffractional study of (Z)-2k17 and (Z)-2n18
(Figure 1). When R2 was an aryl group, the corresponding
carbonylation of 1-(4′-methoxyphenyl)hept-2-yn-1-ol gave
only a complex mixture. The cyclocarbonylation of tertary
alcohol 2-methyloct-3-yn-2-ol 1q also gave (Z)-R-chloro-
alkylidene â-lactone (Z)-2q in 50% yield (eq 1).
(8) Buchwald, S. L.; Fang, Q.; King, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
3445.
(9) Consorti, C. S.; Ebeling, G.; Dupont, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
753.
(10) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; De Pascali, F.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 147.
(11) Matsuda, I.; Ogiso, A.; Sato, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6120.
(12) (a) Bohlmann, F.; Zdero, C.; King, R. M.; Robinson, H. Phytochem-
istry 1981, 20, 1069. (b) Bohlmann, F.; Zdero, C.; King, R. M.; Robinson,
H. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 2860. (c) Bohlmann, F.; Paul, A. H. K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1697.
(13) (a) Adam, W.; Albert, R.; Hasemann, L.; Nava Salgado, V. O.;
Nestler, B.; Peters, E.-M.; Peters, K.; Prechtl, F.; von Schnering, H. G. J.
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5782. (b) Danheiser, R. L.; Choi, Y. M.; Men-
ichincheri, M.; Stoner, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 322. (c) Martinez, I.;
Andrews, A. E.; Emch, J. D.; Ndakala, A. J.; Wang, J.; Howell, A. R. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 399. (d) For a review, see: Pommier, A.; Pons, J.-M. Synthesis
1993, 441.
(14) (a) Adam, W.; Nava Salgado, V. O.; Peters, E.-M.; Peters, K.; von
Schnering, H. G. Chem. Ber. 1993, 126, 1481. (b) Payne, G. B. J. Org.
Chem. 1966, 31, 718. (c) Baxter, G. J.; Brown, R. F. C.; Eastwood, F. W.;
Gatehouse, B. M.; Nesbit, M. C. Aust. J. Chem. 1978, 31, 1757. (d) Ben
Cheikh, A.; Pommelet, J.-C.; Chuche, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1990, 615. (e) Masters, A. P.; Sorensen, T. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
5869.
A detailed study showed that some amounts of (E)-R-
chloroalkylidene-â-lactone (E)-2a and butenolide 3a were
also formed, which were difficult to purify (Figure 2).
(16) (a) Adam, W.; Albert, R.; Dachs Grau, N.; Hasemann, L.; Nestler,
B.; Peters, E.-M.; Peters, K.; Prechtl, F.; von Schnering, H. G. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 5778. (b) Adam, W.; Hasemann, L.; Prechtl, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1536.
(15) (a) Zhang, C.; Lu, X. Synthesis 1996, 586. (b) Bartels, A.; Jones,
P. G.; Liebscher, J. Synthesis 1998, 1645.
4430
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003