The felicitous inclusion of the Grubbs olefin metathesis
reaction14 in our present-day repertoire of versatile methods
for carbocyclization compelled us to adopt it in our plan for
the synthesis of malayamycin A. Thus, the main challenge
became one of peripheral manipulation of a diol in â-
pseudouridine, installation of the vinyl and allyl ether
appendages, and testing the Grubbs metathesis reaction to
produce the strained trans-fused bicyclic motif. The judicious
choice of reagents and timing of reactions from the unsatur-
ated bicyclic motif would eventually lead to the intended
target.
D-Ribonolactone 2 was converted to the corresponding 2,3-
O-isopropylidene-5-(2-methoxy-2-methyl) ether 3 in excel-
lent yield (Scheme 1). Treatment with 2,4-dimethoxy-5-
lithiopyrimidine led to a mixture of anomeric hemiacetals,
which was reduced with L-Selectride in the presence of ZnCl2
to afford diol 5 with high stereoselectivity.11 Under the
conditions of the Mitsunobu reaction,15 diol 5 underwent a
site-selective oxycyclization to give the protected â-pseudo-
uridine derivative 6 in 91% yield. Cleavage of the acetals,
and selective etherification at C3′/C5′ as the disiloxane
derivative followed by treatment with p-methoxybenzyl
bromide led to 7 in excellent yield. Mild selective cleavage
of the disiloxane exposed the free primary alcohol, which
was oxidized to the aldehyde and further converted to the
olefin 9. Allylation under standard conditions afforded 10,
which was subjected to a Grubbs metathesis reaction14 to
give the bicyclic tetrahydrofuropyran derivative 11 in 89%
yield.16 Treatment of 11 with NBS in aq THF17 gave the
bromohydrin 12, which when treated with aqueous NaOH
gave the epoxide 13 in good overall yield. Regioselective
opening of the epoxide ring with NaN3 led to the trans azido
alcohol 14 as the major product (5:1) as ascertained by
detailed NMR studies.
Figure 1.
under strongly acidic (pH <1) or basic conditions (pH >12),
but could otherwise be easily handled at neutral pH.
The perhydrofuropyran motif in malayamycin A distin-
guishes itself from the structurally related ezomycins and
octosyl acids by the absence of a carboxyl group, and the
presence of a cis-vicinal amino alcohol in the “D-ribo-
perhydropyran” portion. Clearly, the main challenges in
planning the synthesis of malayamycin A consist of the
5-pyrimidinyl â-C-glycosidic bond, the trans-fused bicyclic
perhydrofuropyran motif, and securing the relative as well
as absolute configuration of stereogenic centers. Although
the commercially available â-pseudouridine could be utilized
as a starting material, its high cost10 compelled us to seek
an alternative synthesis that was amenable to scale-up.11
Previously, our construction of the trans-fused perhydrofu-
ropyran motif in quantamycin8 and octosyl acid A6,7 relied
on an intramolecular oxycyclization of a thionium inter-
mediate3b,12 and oxymercuration13 of an olefin, respectively.
Oxidation of the alcohol to give 15 and NMR analysis
confirmed the position of the azide group. Treatment of the
(12) A related method was used in the synthesis of the octosyl nucleoside
portion of ezomycin A1: Knapp, S.; Shih, W.-C.; Jaramillo, C.; Trilles, R.
V.; Nandan, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 948.
(13) Hill, C. L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 820.
(14) (a) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100. For pertinent reviews, see: (b) Grubbs, R.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 4413. (c) Armstrong, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1998,
371. Fu¨rstner, A.; Picquet, M.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, H. H. Chem. Commun.
1998, 1315. Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 2036.
(15) (a) Guianvarc’h, D.; Fourrey, J.-L.; Tran Huu Dau, M.-E.; Gue´rineau,
V.; Benhida, R. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3724. For reviews, see: (b)
Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1. (c) Hughes, D. C. Org. React. 1992, 42,
335.
(16) For the synthesis of related bicyclic fused compounds, see: (a) Ravn,
J.; Nielsen, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 985. (b) Oh, J.; Lee, C.
R.; Chun, K. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4879. (c) Leeuwenburgh, M.
A.; Kulker, C.; Dugnster, H. I.; Overkleeft, H. S.; van der Marel, G. A.;
van Boom, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8253. (d) Leeuwenburgh, M. A.;
Overkleeft, H. S.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. Synlett 1997, 1263.
(e) Nicolaou, K. C.; Postema, H. D.; Claiborne, C. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 1565. (f) Clark, J. S.; Kettle, J. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
127. (g) Oishi, T.; Nagumo, Y.; Hirama, M. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1041.
(h) Delgado, M.; Martin, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6299. (i) Peris,
E.; Cave´, A.; Estornell, E.; Zafra,-Polo, M. C.; Frigade`re, B.; Cortes, D.;
Bermejo´, A. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1335.
(10) (a) Grohar, P. J.; Chow, C. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2049.
(b) Brown, D. M.; Ogden, R. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 723
and references therein. For the synthesis of unnatural C-linked nucleosides,
see: (c) Matulic-Adamic, J. M.; Beigelman, L.; Portmann, S.; Egli, M.;
Usman, N. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3909. (d) Matulic-Adamic, J. M.;
Beigelman, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1669. (e) Schweitzer, B. A.;
Kool, E. T. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7238. (f) Hildebrand, S.; Leumann, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1968. (g) Parsch, J.; Engels, J. W.
HelV. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1791.
(17) (a) Bannard, R. A. B.; Casselman, A. A.; Hawkins, L. R. Can. J.
Chem. 1965, 43, 2398. (b) Bannard, R. A. B.; Casselman, A. A.; Langstaff,
E. J.; Moir, R. Y. Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 35.
(11) Hanessian, S.; Machaalani, R. Tetrahedron Lett. In press.
4278
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003