Organic Letters
Letter
activation of amide 1a with Tf2O (1.05 equiv) and 2-ClPy
(3.00 equiv) followed by the addition of DMSO (1.20 equiv)
gave complete sulfoxide addition and conversion to α-
sulfonium amide 3aa at −30 °C without the observation of
any persistent intermediates by in situ IR.15 The exposure of
sulfonium ion 3aa to excess triethylamine in acetonitrile at
60 °C subsequently led to quantitative demethylation16 and
afforded α-sulfide amide 4a (67% yield, two steps).
Furthermore, a single-step procedure was also developed
wherein the use of tert-butyl methyl sulfoxide (TBMSO, 2b) as
the sulfidation reagent enabled direct access to sulfide 4a in
54% yield via the spontaneous dealkylation of α-sulfonium
amide 3ab.
stability of the α-sulfonium ion intermediate 3 led to low
isolated yields of the desired product (4i and 4j). When
demethylation was omitted, dimethylsulfonium trifluorome-
thanesulfonates 3aa and 3ba derived from morpholine and
pyrrolidine amides 1a and 1b could be isolated in 61 and 68%
yield, respectively.14
Employing our single-step sulfidation procedure, we also
examined the use of other tert-butyl sulfoxides 2c−2e with
amide 1a to give the corresponding α-sulfide amides 4p−4r.14
In each case, the primary alkyl substituent of the tert-butyl
sulfoxide was preserved, owing to the relative stability of the
cation derived from the tert-butyl substituent in the
spontaneous dealkylation. Complimentarily, α-sulfide amide
4r was also obtained in 62% yield with methyl sulfoxide 2f after
regioselective dealkylation, leaving the homobenzylic sub-
stituent intact. Whereas the two-step procedure generally
affords higher yields, tert-butyl sulfoxides directly form the α-
sulfide amides. Additionally, the use of tert-butyl sulfoxides
enables the sulfidation of substrates where the α-sulfonium ion
intermediate is subject to hydrolysis (e.g., sulfidation of α,α-
diphenyl acetamide S1 to α-thiomethyl amide S4).14
The application of this chemistry to the α-sulfidation of α-
aryl acetamides is illustrated in Scheme 3. Sulfide 4a could be
a
Scheme 3. α-Sulfidation of Benzylic Amides
In evaluating the scope of the transformation, we found that
the conditions described in Scheme 3 were not compatible
with amides other than α-aryl acetamides. We therefore
pursued a series of mechanistic experiments to guide our
efforts to expand the substrate scope of our amide sulfidation
methodology. Whereas the use of DMSO-d6 (2a-d6) for the α-
sulfidation of benzylic amide 1b led to α-sulfide amide 4b-d3 in
71% yield (eq 1), when DMSO-d6 (2a-d6) was used with
aliphatic amide 1t, we only observed the recovery of tertiary
amide 1t-d1 (85% yield) with 88 atom % D incorporation at
the α-position (eq 2).14 We attributed these observations to a
retro-ene reaction from intermediate 7ta-d6 that is preferred
for aliphatic substrates.21,22
a
Reagents and conditions: Method A (methyl sulfoxides): Tf2O (1.05
Toward our goal of the mechanism-guided expansion of the
scope of our α-sulfidation chemistry, it was necessary to
develop a detailed understanding of the underlying sulfidation
pathway. We envisioned that oxysulfonium ion intermediate 7,
derived from the addition of sulfoxide to keteniminium 6,
undergoes rearrangement to give the α-sulfonium amide 3.
Both intra- and intermolecular pathways for 1,3-sulfur shifts
were identified by Kwart for neutral sulfides,23 and we have
previously described an intramolecular pathway in our
modified Abramovitch reaction.5e In contrast with these
existing proposals, we identified a distinct intermolecular
sulfidation pathway supported by density functional theory
(DFT) calculations, wherein an electrophilically activated
sulfoxide 824 transfers the sulfonium moiety via a cyclic
transition state (Scheme 4).
equiv), 2-ClPy (3.00 equiv), CH2Cl2, −78 → 0 °C, 15 min; methyl
sulfoxide (2a, 2f, 1.20 equiv), CH2Cl2, −78 → 22 °C, 45 min; Et3N
(10 equiv), MeCN, 60 °C, 15 h. Method B (tert-butyl sulfoxides):
Tf2O (1.05 equiv), 2-ClPy (3.00 equiv), CH2Cl2, −78 → 0 °C, 15
min; tert-butyl sulfoxide (2b−2e, 1.20 equiv), CH2Cl2, −78 → 22 °C,
45 min. Yields are reported: Method A, Method B.
prepared on a 5.00 mmol scale without compromising the
reaction efficiency via either the two-step procedure (Method
A: 70% yield) or the single-step procedure (Method B: 56%
yield). A variety of α-aryl acetamides including versatile
morpholine-derived amides (4a and 4h−4o),17 in addition to
N-methoxy- (4c),18 N-phenyl- (4e and 4f), and N-benzyl-
substituted (4d and 4g) amides, served as substrates for this
transformation.19,20 Substituents that may compromise the
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX