1484
M. Bourotte et al.
LETTER
(CH2); 118.29 (C5); 126.37 (2 CHAr); 128.27 (CHAr);
128.44 (2 CHAr); 129.29 (2 CHAr); 129.54 (2 CHAr);
129.95 (CHAr); 132.14 (C4); 135.39 (CAr); 138.00 (CAr);
149.57 (C3); 152.13 (C6). 4a: Yield 23%. 1H NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) d 4.98 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2 H, CH2Ph); 6.42 (m, 1 H,
NHBn exchange with D2O); 7.3–7.6 (m, 10 H, ArH); 8.79 (s,
1 H, H6). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) d 46.56 (CH2);
128.06 (2 CHAr); 128.25 (2 CHAr); 128.49 (2 CHAr);
129.26 (CHAr); 129.76 (2 CHAr); 130.55 (CHAr); 132.29
(C5); 133.06 (CAr); 133.34 (C4); 138.05 (CAr); 145.11
(C6); 149.46 (C3). Similar satisfactory spectral data were
obtained for 3b and 4b.
(13) Maes, B. U. W.; R’kyek, O.; Kosmrlj, J.; Lemiere, G. L. F.;
Esmans, E.; Rozenski, J.; Dommisse, R.; Haemers, A.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 1323.
(14) Maes, B. U. W.; Monsieurs, K.; Loones, K. T. J.; Lemiere,
G. L. F.; Dommisse, R.; Matyus, P.; Riedl, Z.; Hajos, G.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9713.
(15) Representative procedure for Suzuki arylations. A
suspension of 5a or 5b (0.60 mmol, 1 equiv), phenylboronic
acid (0.69 mmol, 1.15 equiv), sodium carbonate 2 M (0.64
mL, 1.27 mmol, 2.12 equiv) in toluene (1.8 mL) and ethanol
(0.2 mL) was stirred under an atmosphere of argon for 30
min. Pd(PPh3)4 (0.027 mmol, 0.045 equiv) was then added
and the mixture was heated at 110 °C for 20 h. The toluene
was removed in vacuo, the residue was diluted with H2O and
extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5 mL). The organic layers were
dried over sodium sulfate, concentrated in vacuo and then
purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (for
compounds 6: EtOAc–hexane 1:2; for compounds 7:
EtOAc–hexane 1:1, TEA 2%). Satisfactory spectral data
were obtained for all new compounds. As an example 7b:
mp 167–169 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) d 3.93 (s, 3 H,
OCH3); 5.02 (br s, 2 H, NH2 exchange with D2O); 7.10 (d,
J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H, ArH); 7.4–7.5 (m, 5 H, ArH); 7.55 (s, 1 H,
H5); 8.04 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H, ArH).
(12) Structures of compounds 3a and 4a have been
unambiguously assigned by hsqc experiments: strong
correlations have been observed between C3 and CH2Ph and
between C3 and C5H for compound 3a, whereas no
correlation could be observed between C3 and C6-H for
compound 4a (Figure 1).
(16) Representative procedure for Sonogashira couplings. A
mixture of 5a or 5b (0.76 mmol, 1 equiv), alkyne (1.14
mmol, 1.5 equiv), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.076 mmol, 0.1 equiv),
CuI (0.076 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and dry triethylamine
(0.158mL, 1.14 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in dry acetonitrile (5 mL)
was flushed with argon for 5 min. The reaction mixture was
heated at 70 °C for 12 h. The solution was concentrated to
dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by
flash chromatography on silica gel (for compounds 6:
EtOAc–hexane 1:3; for compounds 7: EtOAc–hexane 1:1,
Et3N 2%). Satisfactory spectral data were obtained for all
new compounds. As an example 6i: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) d 1.93 (m, 2 H, CH2); 2.64 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H, CH2);
3.59 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H, CH2); 4.49 (s, 2 H, OCH2Ph); 4.90
(d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H, NHCH2Ph); 5.50 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1 H, NH
exchange with D2O); 7.3–7.5 (m, 13 H, ArH); 7.59 (s, 1 H,
H5); 8.00 (m, 2 H, ArH).
Figure 1
Representative procedure for the preparation of 5a,b
from 3a,b. To a solution of 3-substituted amino-4-nitro-6-
phenylpyridazine 3a,b (1.36 mmol) in acetic acid (8 mL)
was added 720 mL of a 5.7 M solution of HBr–AcOH (4.10
mmol, 3 equiv). The mixture was then heated at 90 °C in a
sealed tube during 3 h. The solvent was evaporated and the
crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc–
hexane, 1:2). 5b: Yield 75%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) d
5.61 (br s, 2 H, NH2 exchange with D2O); 7.3–7.5 (m, 3 H,
ArH); 7.80 (s, 1 H, H5); 7.8–7.9 (m, 2 H, ArH). ESMS m/z:
250 (M+, 79Br), 252 (M+, 81Br). Similar satisfactory spectral
data were obtained for 5a.
Synlett 2003, No. 10, 1482–1484 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York