2
Tetrahedron Letters
O
O
O
derivatives or the enzymatic decarboxylation catalyzed by
ODCase.
Br
Br
H
O
H
O
H
O
Br
Br2
N
N
N
HOAc
N
R
6
N
R
8
N
R
3
Experimental Details
All reagents were obtained from commercial sources
and used without further purification. Only the
experimental procedures for the conversion of
Scheme 3
dihydrouracil 6 to 5-bromouracil 3 are described here using
The
products were purified through recrystallization or column
chromatography. Procedures for other synthetic steps were
described in literature and were employed without
modification.
1-cyclohexyl-5,6-dihydrouracil as an example.
The dibromination of 6 to 8 was effected by using more
than two equivalents of bromine. Interestingly, it was
observed that a fraction of dibromide 8 underwent
elimination spontaneously to produce bromouracil 3 under
the reaction conditions (acetic acid, 100 °C). We thought
to further simplify the synthetic route by combining the
bromination and elimination steps. The bromination
reaction was thus carried out in boiling acetic acid. Under
the new reaction condition, dihydrouracil 6 was converted
to 5-bromouracil 3 in one step, in contrast to the three-step
sequence in the original synthesis. The yields for the one-
step reactions were excellent for various primary and
secondary substituting groups (tertiary groups were found
to be labile under the highly acidic reaction conditions as
expected) tested as shown in Table 1. In the case when
cyclohexyl was the substituting group, the yields for the
two synthetic routes were directly compared. The direct
conversion of 6a to 3a (R = cyclohexyl) was found to be
quantitative (the yield is 89% if purified by
recrystallization), whereas the reported yields for the three
synthetic steps were 69% (6a to 7a), 85% (7a to 2a), and
75% (2a to 3a), respectively, giving an overall yield of
44% from 6a to 3a.14,17 Therefore, the modified one-step
Typical experimental procedure: 1-Cyclohexyl-5,6-
dihydrouracil (1.00 g, 5.1 mmol) was dissolved in 12 mL
acetic acid in a round-bottomed flask. A solution of
bromine (3.24 g, 20.2 mmol) in 10 mL acetic acid was
added to the reaction flask and the reaction mixture was
refluxed. The reaction usually took five to six hours and
was followed by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Upon
completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was
evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The solid
residue was purified by either column chromatography
(10% ethyl acetate/methylene chloride as solvent) or
recrystallization from ethanol to produce 5-bromo-1-
cyclohexyluracil as colorless flakes; mp 220-222 °C, lit.
mp 225 °C.17
Acknowledgments
procedure reported here represents
a
significantly
simplified and improved method to synthesize N1-
substituted orotic acid derivatives.
This investigation was supported by the National Institutes
of Health, Grant SC1 GM095419. N.A.S. and J.T.B. were
supported by the Beckman Scholarship. R.S.M. and S.L.
were summer students supported by the BRIDGE Program
(funded by NIH) and Project SEED (the American
Chemical Society), respectively. The NMR facility was
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-9451624
and DBI 0521342). We thank Professor Ihsan Erden
(SFSU) for helpful discussions.
Table 1. Yields for the one-step conversion of 5,6-
dihydrouracil 6 to 5-bromouracil 321
Entry 1-Substituted
dihydrouracils (6)
5,6- Yield (isolated)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
100 (89)a
85
6a, R = cyclohexyl
6b, R = n-butyl
6c, R = n-propyl
6d, R = isobutyl
6e, R = sec-butyl
References
88
1. Beak, P.; Siegel, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3601-3606.
2. Radzicka, A.; Wolfenden, R. Science 1995, 267, 90-93.
3. Lee, J. K.; Houk, K. N. Science 1997, 276, 942-945.
4. Kakanishi, M. P.; Wu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6271–
6272.
86
100
5. Feng, W. Y.; Austin, T. J.; Chew, F.; Gronert, S.; Wu, W.
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 1778-1783.
6. Singleton, D. A.; Merrigan, S. R.; Kim, B. J.; Beak, P.;
Phillips, L. M.; Lee, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
3296–3300.
aYield in parenthesis when purified by recrystallization.
7. Wong, F. M.; Wu, W. Bioorg. Chem. 2006, 34, 99–104.
8. Yeoh, F. Y.; Cuasito, R. R.; Capule, C. C.; Wong, F. M.; Wu,
W. Biorg. Chem. 2007, 35, 338–343.
9. Wong, F. W.; Capule, C. C.; Wu, W. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
6019-6022.
It should be pointed out again that this synthetic route
allows the incorporation of a single 15N label at either N1 or
N3. Such labeled compounds may aid in the mechanistic
investigation of the model decarboxylation of orotic acid