from (R)-1 and transformed into 3 in the first step; and
Johnson reported an easy synthesis of PGE1 from a TBDMS-
protected (R)-1, which was transformed into 4 in the first
step.11 Compound 1 has been obtained in both enantiomeri-
cally pure forms starting from L- or D-tartaric acid in six
steps in a 22% yield,12 or by a chemoenzymatic access
starting from cyclopentane-1,3-dione to give a 30% yield of
each enantiomer.13 The corresponding vinyl halides were
obtained by treatment of 1 in a bromination-dehydrobro-
mination sequence9 or in a one-step approach by treatment
of 1 with I2/pyridine in CCl4.14
the usual conditions) into cyclopentenone 7 by treatment with
LDA in THF. The transformation gave low yields in both
cases, 10% and 19%, respectively, with the majority of the
starting material being recovered. Compound 7 has been
obtained previously (although in racemic form) by Fuchs23
and used in the synthesis of dl-cephalotaxine,24 and has been
epoxidized by Jackson to give epoxide 8 stereoselectively25
(Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Figure 2.
The epoxidation of acyclic vinyl sulfones has been widely
studied by Jackson,26 and the reactivity of these species has
been applied in the synthesis of natural products.27 The
stereoselectivity described by Jackson in systems similar to
5 depends on the oxidant used and on the protecting groups.25
Having compound 5 in hand, we decided to study the
epoxidation of this molecule to develop a route to the
â-epoxide of the cyclized compound, which has not been
previously described. When compound 5 was submitted to
epoxidation conditions with t-BuOOLi or t-BuOOK, com-
pounds 9 and 10 were obtained in an excellent yield in a
ratio of 95:5 in both cases. The excellent stereoselectivity
could be understood on the basis of less hindrance in
transition state I than II (see Scheme 3). For a discussion
see ref 25a. To study this further, the combined MCMM/
Lowmode conformational search method in MacroModel28
was used to locate low-energy conformers of 5, using up to
2000 steps, the MMFF force field, TNCG minimization, and
the GB/SA/CHCl3 model for solvation. The lowest energy
conformers found corresponded directly to that required for
transition state I. Geometry optimization of the lowest energy
conformers of 5 of types I and II found in the MacroModel
The versatility of vinyl sulfones in organic chemistry has
been demonstrated by Backwall,15 Fuchs,16 Carretero,17 and
Padwa,18 among others.19 This paper describes a new
contribution to extend the versatility of vinyl sulfone
chemistry, in particular with compound 5, easily obtained
in two steps and in 76% yield from 2,3-O-isopropylidene-
D-erythronolactol.20 The enantiomer is also easily accessible,
starting from L-arabinose.21
Scheme 1
Vinyl sulfones are known to react as Michael acceptors
and to stabilize an anion in the R position.22 Taking this
reactivity into account, we started the transformation of the
vinyl sulfone 5 or its iodide derivative 6 (obtained under
(20) D´ıez, D.; Templo-Bene´itez, M.; Marcos, I. S.; Garrido, N. M.;
Basabe, P.; Urones, J. G. Synlett 2003, 729.
(21) Hudlicky, T.; Luna, H.; Price, J. D.; Rulin, F. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 4683 and references therein.
(22) Simpkins, N. S. Sulphones in Organic Synthesis. In Tetrahedron
Organic Series; Pergamon: New York, 1993.
(7) (a) Patterson, J. W.; Fried J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 2506. (b)
Tanaka, T.; Kurozumi, S.; Toru, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Miura, S.; Ishimoto,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 1535.
(8) Caddick S.; Khan, S.; Smith, N. J.; Barr, D. M.; Delisser, V. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5035.
(9) Levin J. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 13.
(23) Nantz, M. H.; Radisson S.; Fuchs, P. L. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17
(1), 55.
(24) Burkholder, T. P.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9601.
(25) (a) Jackson, R. F. W.; Standen, S. P.; Clegg, W. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 149.
(26) (a) Ashwell, M.; Jackson, R. F. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1989, 835. (b) Ashwell, M.; Clegg, W.; Jackson, R. F. W. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 897. (c) Hewkin, C. T.; Jackson, R. F. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 1877. (d) Hewkin, C. T.; Jackson, R. F. W.; Clegg, W. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 3091. (e) Dunn, S. F. C.; Jackson, R. F.
W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 2863. (f) Jackson, R. F. W.;
Standen, S. P.; Glegg, W.; McCamley, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1995, 141.
(10) Rowley, M.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4909.
(11) Johnson, C. R.; Braun, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11014.
(12) Ogura, K.; Yamashita, M.; Tsuchihashi, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976,
10, 759.
(13) Demir, A. S.; Sesenoglu, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 667.
(14) Johnson, C. R.; Adams, J. P.; Braun, M. P.; Senanayake, C. B. W.;
Wovkulich, P. M.; Uskokovic, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 917.
(15) Ba¨ckvall, J.-E.; Juntunen, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2398.
(16) Fuchs, P. L.; Hentemann, M. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1355.
(17) Iradier, F.; Arryas, R. G.; Carretero, J. C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2957.
(18) Padwa, A.; Murphree, S. S.; Ni, Z. J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3829.
(19) Ba¨ckvall, J.-E.; Chinchilla, R.; Na´jera, C.; Yus, M. Chem. ReV. 1998,
98, 2291.
(27) Reddy, R.; Jaquith, J. B.; Neelagiri, V. R.; Saleh-Hanna, S.; Durst,
T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 695.
(28) MacroModel v 8.1031; Schrodinger, Inc.: Portland, OR.
4362
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003