stacking in the o-aryl backbone. The solid state structure of 3a
(and by inference, 3b) appears to be retained in solution. The 1H
NMR spectrum of 3a reveals the presence of two distinct methyl
groups at 1.61 and 1.50 ppm, assigned to the meso-substituents
that lie syn and anti to the cleft, respectively. A dynamic process
that would render these environments equivalent in solution is
precluded as Pd–N(imino) bond cleavage is a prerequisite in
order to progress through a symmetrical, flattened macrocyclic
conformation.
We are at present investigating the luminescent properties of
3a and 3b, and the syntheses of transition metal complexes
incorporating L. Preliminary results suggest that, as with
bimetallic cofacial diporphyrins,8 dicobalt(II) complexes of L
react spontaneously with O2; thus, reaction between Co(OAc)2
and H4[L1]/NEt3 in air forms the oxo-complex [Co2O(L1)] as
the sole product (by ESMS, 735 amu).
We thank the Royal Society (J.B.L, University Research
Fellowship), the University of Nottingham, and the EPSRC for
support.
Notes and references
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: experimental and
‡ Satisfactory combustion analyses were obtained for all reported com-
pounds. Crystal data: 2a: C64.5H72N8O12.5S3.5, triclinic, a = 12.9007(10),
b = 16.2779(13), c = 18.0091(14) Å, a = 75.638(1), b = 75.199(1), g =
85.938(1) °, U = 3542.0(5) Å3, T = 150(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2,
Fig. 2 Solid state structures of the dipalladium compounds 3a and 3b (50 %
ellipsoids). H-atoms are omitted for clarity.
¯
m(Mo-Ka) = 0.181 mm21, 32396 reflections measured, 16861 unique (Rint
= 0.005) which were used in all calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.2704
(all data). 3a:
C38.25H33N8O0.25Pd2, triclinic, a = 9.4559(8), b =
alkyl chain linkers between the two donor compartments lead to
greater conformational flexibility but is more reminiscent of
single-pillared, or ‘Pac-Man’ porphyrins (Fig. 3).7,8 It is
significant that while ligands H4[L] appear highly flexible, the
dipalladium complexes 3a and 3b are highly rigid and
synthetically more available than their Pac-Man analogues.
Although the presence of the sp3-CMe2 group in the dipyrrolide
backbone precludes full conjugation of the N4-donor set, the
planarity observed and structural similarity to single-pillared
porphyrins warrants comparison. In 3a, the Pd…Pd distance of
3.76 Å is similar to that seen in the cofacial, single-pillared
diporphyrin complex Pd2(DPX) (dibenzoxanthene pillar)
(Pd…Pd = 3.97 Å).9 However, the ‘bite angle,’ q, between the
PdN4 planes of 56.5° in 3a is much greater than that observed in
Pd2(DPX), where the porphyrin rings are effectively co-planar
(q = 3.9°);§ the use of single dibenzofuran pillars results in
larger bite angles (q = 20–25°) and can accommodate metal–
metal distances from 3.5 to 7.8 Å.10 A torsional twist is evident
in 3a (F = 19°) and 3b (F = 22°) (Fig. 2). These values lie
between those of the torsionally rigid Pac-Man porphyrins (F =
2–7°) and the more flexible cofacial, amide-linked diporphyrins
(e.g. dicopper hexyldiporphyrin-7, F = 43.2°, Fig. 3).11 This
relatively large twist in 3a and 3b is presumably a consequence
of destabilising, steric interactions between the meso-groups of
the dipyrrolide unit, and the need to maximise face-to-face p-
13.2076(11), c = 14.3084(12) Å, a = 74.331(2), b = 86.576(2), g =
81.503(2) °, U = 1701.3(4) Å3, T = 150(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2,
¯
m(Mo-Ka) = 1.099 mm21, 14533 reflections measured, 7481 unique (Rint
= 0.032) which were used in all calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.0704
(all data). 3b: C60H45N8O0.5Pd2, triclinic, a = 10.3192(14), b = 13.238(2),
c = 14.403(2) Å, a = 88.446(2), b = 77.151(2), g = 75.866(2) °, U =
2374.4(9) Å3, T = 150(2) K, space group P1, Z = 2, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.810
mm21, 20521 reflections measured, 10455 unique (Rint = 0.030) which
were used in all calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.0964 (all data). CCDC
crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
§ q = Pd1–X–Pd2 angle, where X = bisector of normal between aryl ring
centroids;F = normal 2 dihedral angle of PdN4 and aryl C6 plane.
1 C. Floriani, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1257; J. Jubb and S. Gambarotta, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 4477; I. Korobkov, S. Gambarotta and G. P.
A. Yap, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 3433.
2 P. A. Gale, P. Anzenbacher, Jr. and J. L. Sessler, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2001, 222, 57.
3 T. D. Mody and J. L. Sessler, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 2001, 5,
134.
4 J. L. Sessler, A. E. Vivian, D. Seidel, A. K. Burrell, M. Hoehner, T. D.
Mody, A. Gebauer, S. J. Weghorn and V. Lynch, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2001, 216–217, 411; S. Hannah, V. Lynch, D. M. Guldi, N. N.
Gerasimchuk, C. L. B. MacDonald, D. Magda and J. L. Sessler, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 8416.
5 N. N. Gerasimchuk, A. Gerges, T. Clifford, A. Danby and K. Bowman-
James, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 5633; W. A. Reiter, A. Gerges, S. Lee,
T. Deffo, T. Clifford, A. Danby and K. Bowman-James, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 1998, 174, 343.
6 J. B. Love, A. J. Blake, C. Wilson, S. R. Reid, A. Novak and P. B.
Hitchcock, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1682.
7 B. J. Pistorio, C. J. Chang and D. G. Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002,
124, 7884.
8 J. P. Collman, P. S. Wagenknecht and J. E. Hutchinson, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1994, 33, 1537.
9 Z.-H. Loh, S. E. Miller, C. J. Chang, S. D. Carpenter and D. G. Nocera,
J. Phys. Chem. A., 2002, 106, 11700.
10 C. J. Chang, E. A. Baker, B. J. Pistorio, Y. Deng, Z.-H. Loh, S. E. Miller,
S. D. Carpenter and D. G. Nocera, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 3102.
11 M. H. Hatada, A. Tulinsky and C. K. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980,
102, 7115.
Fig. 3 Examples of Pac-Man, accordion and cofacial porphyrins.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2508–2509
2509
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England