1176
N.-H. Nam et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 1173–1176
the para-dihydroxy functionality for the strong cyto-
toxicity of 9aa and 9ab. Noteworthy however, a 1,4-
dihydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone (DHAQ) was also inactive
up to 30 mg/mL in all cell lines assayed. Thus, the
incorporation of the propenoate moiety onto DHAQ
conferred a strong cytotoxicity to the resulting com-
pounds 9aa and 9ab. To the best of our knowledge, this
practice has not been reported for the anthracyclines
though hundreds of analogues of this class have been
prepared in the past decades. In 9aa and 9ab, the pro-
penoate side chain might play an important role in
enhancing the oxidative formation of an anthracene-
1,4,9,10-tetraone metabolite, which is then available for
rereduction and hence undergoes a futile redox cycling,
a known action mechanism of anthraquinones.21 It is
expected that the introduction of a double bond con-
necting C9–C10 in the structure of doxorubicin could
produce a novel analogue with superior bioactivity
without increasing complication of mutagenic and car-
cinogenic toxicity as explained in the preceding
paragraph. This venture remains to be studied.
comparable cytotoxicity to Adriamycin1 and (E)-methyl/
ethyl 3-[2-(1,4-dimethoxy-5,8-dione)naphthalenyl]-2-pro-
penoates, the first naphthoquinone derivatives showing
strong cytotoxicities against solid tumor cell lines. Eva-
luation against multi-drug resistance cells as well as in
vivo experiments are underway.
References and Notes
1. Komatsu, T.; Awata, H.; Sakai, Y.; Inukai, T.; Kimura,
M.; Inaba, S.; Yamamoto, H. Arzneimittelforschung 1972, 22,
2099.
2. Balsamo, A.; Crotti, P.; Lapucci, A.; Macchia, B.; Mac-
chia, F.; Cuttica, A.; Passerini, N. J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24,
525.
3. Gupta, S. K.; Banerjee, A. B.; Achari, B. Lloydia 1976, 39,
218.
4. Delle Monache, G.; Botta, B.; Delle Monache, F.; Espinal,
R.; De Bonnevaux, S. C.; De Luca, C.; Botta, M.; Corelli, F.;
Carmignani, M. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2956.
5. Bernier, J. L.; Henichart, J. P.; Warin, V.; Trentesaux, C.;
Jardillier, J. C. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 497.
6. Artico, M.; Di Santo, R.; Costi, R.; Novellino, E.; Greco,
G.; Massa, S.; Tramontano, E.; Marongiu, M. E.; De Montis,
A.; La Colla, P. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3948.
7. Buzzetti, F.; Brasca, M. G.; Crugnola, A.; Fustinoni, S.;
Longo, A.; Penco, S.; Dalla Zonca, P.; Comoglio, P. M.
Farmaco 1993, 48, 615.
8. Poradosu, E.; Gazit, A.; Reuveni, H.; Levitzki, A. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 1727.
9. Ken-ichi, S.; Tohru, O.; Naomi, A.; Hirotsuku, M.; Masao,
H.; Ikuo, S. Bio. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 20, 345.
10. Nam, N. H.; Huong, H. T. T.; Kim, H. M.; Ahn, B. Z.
Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 2000, 31, 77.
Encouraged by the interesting results obtained from 9aa
and 9ab, we went on to synthesize two naphthoquinone
derivatives 8ba and 8bb. Previously, Song et al.16 repor-
ted several series of highly cytotoxic naphthoquinones
against leukemic cell lines but none of them was active
against solid tumor cells. Our result showed that naph-
thoquinones 8ba and 8bb were significantly cytotoxic
against all three solid tumor cell lines with IC50 values
as low as 0.5 mg/mL. No naphthoquinone derivatives
exerting notable cytotoxicity against solid tumor cells
have been documented at the time of writing. 1,4-
Demethylation of 8ba and 8bb slightly enhanced their
activity toward A431 but substantially decreased cyto-
toxicity against B16 and HCT116. This shift is still not
fully understood though it has been noted for other
naphthoquinones on leukemia cells previously.16
11. Personal unpublished results.
12. Ahn, B. Z.; Sok, D. E. Curr. Pharm. Design 1996, 2, 247.
13. Lee, K. H.; Huang, E. S.; Piantadosi, C.; Pagano, J.;
Geissman, T. A. Cancer Res. 1971, 31, 1649.
14. Lee, K. H.; Hall, I. H.; Starness, C. D.; Elgebaly, S. A.;
Waddell, T. G.; Hadgraft, R. T.; Ruffler, C. G.; Weidner, I.
Science 1977, 196, 533.
15. Guang, Z. J.; Song, G. Y.; Zheng, S. G.; Kim, Y.; Sok,
D. E.; Ahn, B. Z. Arch. Pharm. Res. 1998, 21, 208.
16. Song, G. Y.; Zheng, X. G.; Kim, Y.; You, Y. J.; Sok,
D. E.; Ahn, B. Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2407.
17. Yasuhiro, T.; Akira, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61,
2039.
Further evaluation of the most active compounds was
carried out in a panel of cancer cell lines and the results
are shown in Table 2. The naphthoquinones 8ba and
8bb and anthraquinone 9aa showed IC50 values of less
than 1 mg/mL in most of the cell lines. It is noteworthy
to mention that two cell lines A549 (lung carcinoma)
and HCT116 (colon cancer) were rather resistant
toward the two cinnamates 4d and 4f.
18. All newly synthesized compounds gave satisfactory ana-
lytical and spectroscopic data.
19. The cytotoxicity assay was performed as described in ref
10.
20. Ollinger, K.; Llopis, J.; Cadenas, E. Archiv. Biochem.
Biophys. 1989, 275, 514.
21. Monks, T. J.; Hanzlik, R. P.; Cohen, G. M.; Ross, D.;
Graham, D. G. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1992, 112, 2.
In conclusion, we have found potent cytotoxicities dis-
played by methyl and ethyl 2,5-dihydroxycinnamates
against a variety of cancer cell lines. We also discovered
simple analogues (E)-methyl/ethyl 3-[2-(1,4-dihydroxy-
9,10-dione)anthracenyl]-2-propenoates with an almost