LETTER
Synthesis of Neomycin Analogs to Investigate Aminoglycoside-RNA Interactions
1325
(6) Sears, P.; Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
2300.
(7) Hendrix, M.; Priestley, E. S.; Joyce, G. F.; Wong, C.-H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3641.
(8) Tor, Y.; Hermann, T.; Westhof, E. Chem. Biol. 1985, 5, 277.
(9) Carter, A. P.; Clemons, W. M.; Brodersen, D. E.; Morgan-
Warren, R. J.; Wimberly, B. T.; Ramakrishnan, V. Nature
2000, 407, 340.
(10) Alper, P. B.; Hendrix, M.; Sears, P.; Wong, C. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1965.
Binding of aminoglycoside analogs 18–24 to the 16S
rRNA A-site (Figure 2) was screened using a FT-ICR
mass spectrometric assay.18 The formation of non-cova-
lent complexes between and the synthetic oligosaccha-
rides and the RNA substrate at different concentrations
were determined and the binding affinities were calculat-
ed. Tight binding neamine served as a positive control
whereas 18–24 did exhibit only weak binding affinity to
the RNA substrate. All aminoglycosides were also tested
in a bacterial transcription/translation assay where only
neamine showed inhibitory activity while analogs 18–24
failed to inhibit translation.
(11) Kavadias, G.; Velkof, S.; Belleau, B. Can. J. Chem. 1978,
56, 404.
(12) (a) Vasella, A.; Witzig, C.; Chiara, J. L.; Martin-Lomas, M.
Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 2073. (b) Lemieux, R.; Cushley,
S. Can. J. Chem. 1963, 43, 858. (c) Baeschlin, D. K.;
Chaperon, A. R.; Green, L. G.; Hahn, M. G.; Ince, S. J.; Ley,
S. V. Chem.–Eur. J. 2000, 6, 172. (d) Contour, M. O.;
Deaye, J.; Little, M.; Wong, E. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 193,
283.
(13) 7: Rf = 0.81 (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:1); 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 7.40–7.28 (m, 10 H), 5.25 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1 H),
4.83 (dd, J = 10.1, 10.1 Hz, 2 H), 4.79 (dd, J = 10.2, 10.2 Hz,
2 H), 4.51 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (dd, J = 6.3, 10.2 Hz, 1
H), 4.27 (dd, J = 6.8, 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.91 (dd, J = 6.6, 6.6
Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (dd, J = 3.0, 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.58 (dd, J = 9.4,
9.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (s, 3 H), 3.03 (s, 3 H), 2.75 (m, 2 H), 1.32
(t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3Cl): d = 137.7,
137.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 85.9, 80.5, 76.1,
76.0, 74.1, 73.6, 67.1, 39.4, 37.8, 25.5, 15.5; HRMS (FAB+)
Calcd for m/z C24H32O9S3Na [(M + Na)+] 583.1106, found
583.1112. 9: Rf = 0.38 (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:1); 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.41 –7.30 (m, 10 H), 4.90 (dd, J = 11.1,
11.1 Hz, 2 H), 4.57 (dd, J = 11.1,11.1 Hz, 2 H), 4.32 (d,
J = 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.74 (dd, J = 2.3, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.78–3.65
(m, 2 H), 3.44 (dd, J = 4.7, 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (dd, J = 6.7,
6.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.36 (m, 1 H), 2.82 (br s, 1 H), 2.75 (m, 2 H),
1.32 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3Cl): d =
138.2, 137.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 84.7,
84.5, 78.0, 75.5, 73.9, 72.6, 70.7, 65.6, 24.9, 15.3; HRMS
(FAB+) Calcd for m/z C22H27N3O4SNa [(M + Na)+]
452.1619, found 552.1624. 10: Rf = 0.53 (hexanes–Et2O,
1:2); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.40–7.32 (m, 10 H),
4.72 (dd, J = 11.6, 11.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.57 (s, 2 H), 4.24 (d,
J = 10.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.08 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.77–3.67 (m, 2
H), 3.54 (dd, J1 = 7.1, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.40 (dd, J = 3.1, 9.4 Hz,
1 H), 2.75 (m, 2 H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75
MHz, CD3Cl): d =138.0, 137.2, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 128.3,
128.1, 128.0, 84.2, 81.3, 77.2, 73.9, 72.1, 69.4, 65.8, 62.1,
24.6, 15.2; HRMS (FAB+) Calcd for m/z C22H27N3O4SNa
[(M + Na)+] 452.1619, found 552.1634.
Figure 2 Sequence and 2° structure of 16S rRNA A-site model.
In conclusion, a series of di- and trisaccharide aminogly-
coside analogs, containing a 2,5-dideoxystreptamine core
in place of the naturally occurring 2-deoxystreptamine
moiety were synthesized. These aminoglycoside analogs,
differing by just one hydroxyl group from neamine, had
markedly lower affinity for the 16S A-site target (> 10-
fold) and did not inhibit bacterial translation.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by ISIS Pharmaceuticals and the NIH
(R41 AI50406). P.H.S. thanks GlaxoSmithKline (Scholar Award),
the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Fellowship) and Merck for finan-
cial support. We thank Dr. K. A. Sannes-Lowery for performing
the binding assays and Ms. L. M. Risen for transcription/translation
and antibacterial assays.
(14) Greenberg, W. A.; Priestley, E. S.; Sears, P. S.; Alper, P. B.;
Rodenbohm, C.; Hendrix, M.; Hung, S.-C.; Wong, C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6527.
(15) Garegg, P. J. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1997, 52,
179.
(16) Glycosylation. General procedure. Thioethyl glycoside (0.1
mmol) and acceptor 2 (0.1 mmol) were coevaporated with
toluene and dried under vacuum. Et2O (1.5 mL), CH2Cl2 (0.5
mL), toluene (0.2 mL), and 4 Å MS (40 mg) were added and
the mixture was cooled to –40 °C. Addition of NIS (0.071
mmol) and AgOTf (0.020 mmol) followed. The mixture was
stirred for 5 h at –40 °C, EtOAc (20 mL) was added and the
filtrate was washed with Na2S2O3 (5% aqueous, 5 mL) and
dried over MgSO4. After removal of the solvents, the residue
was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford
the disaccharides as two diastereomers.
References
(1) (a) Present address: Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH,
65926 Frankfurt, Germany (b) Present address: Provid
Pharmaceuticals, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
(2) Pearson, N. D.; Prescott, C. D. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 409.
(3) Baumann, M.; Bischoff, H.; Schmidt, D.; Griesinger, C. J.
Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2172.
(4) Michael, K.; Tor, Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2091.
(5) Stage, T. K.; Hertel, K. J.; Uhlenbeck, O. C. RNA 1995, 1,
95.
Synlett 2003, No. 9, 1323–1326 ISSN 1234-567-89 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York