452
P. Rani et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 39 (2004) 449–452
C–H), 1710 (C=O), 1680 (C=N), 1600 (C–N), 1560 (C
C
5.2.4. Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as mean S.E.M. Statistical
significance was determined using Student’s ‘t’ test.
of aromatic ring), 1500 (N–N), 1430 (N=N). 1H-NMR
(CDCl3) d; (ppm): 2.17 (3H, ss, –COCH3), 5.92 (1H, d,
–CH-N=N–Ar), 6.25–7.88 (15H, m; 14H, Ar–H + 1H, –CH–
Ar), 8.62 (1H, ss, NH of indole, exchangeable with D2O), 9.0
(1H, s, Ar–OH, exchangeable with D2O). MS: [M]+ m/z 423.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to CDRI, Lucknow and IIT, Delhi for
elemental and spectral analysis of newly synthesised com-
pounds.
5.2. Pharmacology
5.2.1. Antiinflammatory activity
A freshly prepared suspension of carrageenan (1.0% in
0.9% saline) 0.05 ml, was injected under the planter apo-
neurosis of right paw of the rat by the method of Winter et al.
[12]. The volume of foot was measured by micropipette
method as described by Buttle et al. [13]. The percentage of
antiinflammatory activity was calculated by the following
References
[1] R.J. Flower, S. Moncada, J.R. Vane, Goodman and Gilman’s the
Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, seventh ed, MacMillan, New-
York, 1985, pp. 695.
[2] P.F. Moore, D.L. Larson, I.G. Otterness, A. Weissman, S.B. Kadin,
F.J. Sweeney, J.D. Eskara, A. Nagahisa, M. Sakakibara, T.J. Carty,
Inflamm. Res. 45 (1996) 54–61.
[3] U. Misra, A. Hitkari, A.K. Saxena, S. Gurtu, K. Shanker, Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 31 (1996) 629–634.
[4] A. Andreani, M. Rambaldi, A. Locatelli, G. Pifferi, Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 29 (1994) 903–906.
V
formula: % Antiinflammatory activity = 1 − t ×100 where,
Vc
Vt and Vc are volume of paw oedema in drug treated and
control groups.
[5] Y. Ebeid Mohamad, M. Lashine Sayed, M. El-Adl Sobhy, E. Abou
Kull Mansour, Zagazig J. Pharm. Sci. 3 (1994) 40–48.
[6] A. El-Gendy Adel, A. Abdou Naida, Z. Sarhan El-Taher, A. El-Banna
Hosny, Alexandria J. Pharm. Sci. 7 (1993) 99–103.
[7] A. Kumar, K.K. Saxena, S. Gurtu, J.N. Sinha, K. Shanker, Indian
Drugs 24 (1986) 1–5.
[8] A. Dandia, V. Sehgal, P. Singh, Indian J. Chem. 32B (1993) 1288–
1291.
[9] M. Verma, M. Tripathi, A.K. Saxena, K. Shanker, Eur. J. Med. Chem.
29 (1994) 941–946.
[10] E. Bansal, V.K. Srivastava, A. Kumar, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 36 (2001)
81–92.
[11] E. Bansal, V.K. Srivastava, A. Kumar, Indian J. Chem. 39B (2000)
357–362.
[12] C.A. Winter, E.A. Risley, C.W. Nuss, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 111
(1962) 544–547.
5.2.2. Ulcerogenic liability
The ulcerogenic liability was determined in albino rats
following the method of Djahanjuiri [14]. The rats were
fasted for 24 h to the administration. Water was allowed ad
libitum to the animals. The test compounds and standard
drug were given intraperitoneally. All rats were killed 8 h
after dosing and the stomach, duodenum and jejunum were
removed and examined to assess: shedding of epithelium;
petechial and frank haemorrhage; and erosion or discrete
ulceration with or without perforation. The presence of any
one of these conditions was considered to be as an evidence
for ulcerogenic activity.
[13] C.A.N. Buttle, P.F.W. Arcy, E.M. Howard, D.M. Kettel, Nature
(London) 176 (1957) 926–937.
[14] B. Djahanjuiri, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 21 (1969) 341–345.
[15] Q.E. Smith, Pharmacological Screening Tests Progress in Medicinal
Chemistry, 1, Butterworths, London, 1960, pp. 1–33.
5.2.3. Acute toxicity
Approximate lethal dose (ALD50) for all the compounds
was investigated in albino mice by the method of Smith [15].