The use of copper was primarily initiated by the goal to
use Cu(OBt)2 according to the “transesterification protocol”
described by Aimoto6 transferring the less reactive thioester
into a more reactive active ester and to take advantage of
the ability of Cu(OBt)2 to maintain the chiral integrity of
the activated C-terminal amino acid when used for active
ester based segment condensation either in solution7 or on
solid support.8
Initially, a simple model peptide thioester (T1: Msc-Leu-
Tyr-Arg-Ala-Gly-SR) was synthesized according to previous
Fmoc-based protocols,9 purified, and subsequently coupled
to another resin bound peptide (N1: H-Phe-Tyr(OtBu)-Gly-
Lys(Boc)-Ala-resin) in the presence of Cu(OBt)2/TMP (Table
1, entry g). In parallel, control experiments were performed
condensation reaction was repeated using CuCl2/TMP and
mixtures of CuCl2/TMP with thiophenate or HOBt. It was
found that addition of either CuCl2 or mixtures involving
thiophenate or HOBt gave no significant acceleration com-
pared to control experiments (Table 1, entries e and h).
Additional experiments were performed to examine the
influence of the oxidation state of copper. Thus, in contrast
to the use of CuCl2/TMP which gave none of the desired
product it was found that the addition of CuCl gave product
in the range of 35-45%.
These yields could be noticeably increased (>88% yield)
by prior addition of thiophenate to preactivate the alkyl
thioester (Table 1, entry j). On the other hand, use of the
commercially available CuI-thiophenolate salt as additive
gave significantly lower amounts of product, thus suggesting
that formation of a more reactive thioester prior to addition
of the CuI additive is advantageous with regard to the speed
of reaction. Furthermore, the combined use of CuCl and
HOBt (Table 1, entry k) showed a synergistic effect with
regard to yields of the target peptide when compared to the
use of CuCl/TMP (Table 1, entry I, 45%) or TMP/HOBt
(yield: 0%) alone.
Table 1. Comparison of Acylation Yields for Different
Additives on Solid Supporta
entry
additive
yield (%)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
0
0
25
25
0
25
90
10
45
85
80
TMP
thiophenate
thiophenate/TMP
CuCl2/TMP
CuCl2/Thiophenate/TMP
Cu(OBt)2/TMP
CuCl2/HOBt/TMP
CuCl/TMP
thiophenate/CuCl/TMP
CuCl/HOBt/TMP
Since the first system examined involved a relatively
unhindered coupling (Gly/Phe; T1/N1), the most effective
additive combinations used [CuCl/thiophenate/TMP and Cu-
(OBt)2/TMP] and were also examined in the case of more
hindered couplings, e.g., Ala/Phe (T2/N1) and Leu/Phe (T3/
N1). It was found that in these cases high yields of coupling
products could also be obtained (Table 2). In the case of the
j
k
a Key: thioester peptide (T1), Msc-Leu-Tyr-Arg-Ala-Gly-S(CH2)2COOEt;
5 equiv of T1 in DMF, 0.2 M final concentration, 5 equiv of base, 5 equiv
of additives, 40 °C, 16 h.
Table 2. Comparison of Acylation Yields and Configurational
Loss for Different Ligation Points Using Different Methods on
Solid Supporta
in which the peptide thioester was reacted with the resin
bound C-terminal peptide without any additives or only in
the presence of a base (Table 1, entries a and b). In addition
the reaction was conducted with sodium thiophenate added
to the aliphatic thioester to increase reactivity via conversion
to the more reactive aromatic thioester. While the reactions
carried out without any additive or only with collidine (TMP)
as base gave no target material after 16 h, the addition of
sodium thiophenate yielded 25% of the target peptide (Table
1, entry c), which is obviously due to direct reaction of the
more reactive thioester with the resin bound peptide.
Interestingly, it was found that addition of Cu(OBt)2/TMP
significantly accelerated the speed of reaction resulting in a
reaction yield of >80% after 16 h (Table 1, entry g).
To elucidate whether the effect is related to a possible
transesterifcation process (thioester f active ester), the
T2 (T3)-N1
entry thioester
additive
yield (%) DL-isomer (%)
a
b
c
d
T2
T3
T2
T3
Cu(OBt)2/TMP
Cu(OBt)2/TMP
Thiophe/CuCl/TMP
Thiophe/CuCl/TMP
80
80
85
80
nd
2.6
nd
2
a Key: thioester peptides (T2), Msc-Leu-Tyr-Arg-Ala-Ala-S(CH2)2COOEt;
(T3), Msc-Leu-Tyr-Arg-Ala-LeuS(CH2)2COOEt; resin-bound peptide N1,
H-Phe-Tyr(tBu)-Gly-Lys(Boc)-Ala-resin; reaction time 16 h; nd, not
determined.
most hindered system (Leu/Phe), the time course for the
reaction (Figure 1) showed that reaction was slower at first
(ca. 10% after 4 h) but eventually reached a high level.
To extend these results to reactions carried out in solution,
peptide thioesters T1 and T3 were used for reaction with
the amino function of C-terminal peptide N2 in DMF. The
reaction conditions varied compared to the solid-phase
approach with regard to the reaction concentration (T1:10
mM; N2 3.3 mM) used.
It was found that after 24 h reaction yields were high in
all cases (Table 3). However, for the Leu-Phe ligation site,
when CuCl/thiophenate was used, the yield was only 50%,
most likely because of steric hindrance at the coupling site.
(7) Califano, J. C.; Devin, C.; Shao, J.; Blodgett, J. K.; Maki, R. A.;
Funk, K. W.; Tolle, J. C. Peptides 2000, Proceedings of 26th EPS, EDK,
Paris, France 2001.
(8) (a) Miyazawa, T.; Otomatsu, T.; Fukui, Y.; Yamadaq, T.; Kuwata,
S. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1986, 28, 468. (b) Nishiyama, Y.; Tanaka,
M.; Saito, S.; Ishizuka, S.; Mori, T.; Kurita, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999,
47, 576. (c) Van Den Nest, W.; Yuval, S.; Albericio, F. J. Peptide Sci.
2001, 7, 115.
(9) Ingenito, R.; Bianchi, E.; Fattori, D.; Pessi, A. J Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 11369. (b) Ingenito, R.; Dreznjak, D.; Guffler, S.; Wenschuh,
H. Org. Lett. 2001, 4, 1187.
4588
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 24, 2003