F IGURE 3. Spin density distribution of 2a calculated by the
DFT UBecke 3LYP hybrid method using the 6-31G basis set.
F IGURE 5. Dimer structure determined by the X-ray crystal-
lography and the packing mode of the dimers. The distances
between N2- - -C14′ and C14- - -N2′ are both 3.47 Å.
C14- - -N2′ with a distance of 3.47 Å to form a dimer,
which is stacked along the c-axis. The nearest distance
between the dimers is 5.99 Å, which is too long to
interact. The calculated spin densities at N2 and C14 are
-0.114 and +0.009. According to the McConnell rule,10
the interaction within the dimer is ferromagnetic, in
agreement with the observation. However, since the spin
density on C14 is very low, the observed weak interaction
can be explained by the very low spin density on C14.
In conclusion, two pyridine ring-carrying N-alkoxyaryl-
aminyls 1 and three imidazole ring-carrying N-alkoxy-
arylaminyls 2 were prepared by the reaction of the
lithium salts of the corresponding anilines with tert-butyl
peroxybenzoate, and the imidazole ring-carrying N-tert-
butoxyarylaminyls could be isolated as radical crystals.
The magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that
2a interacts ferromagnetically. Analysis of the ømolT vs
T plots using the dimer model gave 2J /kB ) 3.4 K as the
ferromagnetic interaction within the dimers.
F IGURE 4.
ømolT vs T plot for 2a . The theoretical line is
calculated by the dimer model with 2J /kB ) 3.4 K.
The magnetic susceptibility measurements were car-
ried out for 2a with a superconducting quantum interfer-
ence device (SQUID) in the temperature range 1.8-300
K. The diamagnetic components were estimated by the
Pascal sum rule. In Figure 4, the ømolT vs T plot is
depicted (ømol: the molar magnetic susceptibility). The
radical purity estimated from the ømolT value (0.350 emu
K mol-1) in the high-temperature region was 93% (the
Curie constant for the paramagnetic 1/2 spin system is
0.376 emu K mol-1). Figure 4 shows that the ømolT value
is constant in the temperature range 30-300 K and
increases slightly below 30 K. Since the X-ray crystal
structure of 2a shows the formation of dimer, the
observed magnetic behavior was analyzed using the
dimer model, and a good agreement of the experimental
data with the theoretical curve was obtained when 2J /
kB was 4.6 K (38 J mol-1). As described in Figure 5, the
two radical molecules contact between N2- - -C14′ and
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. 4-(1H-Imidazol-1-yl)aniline (7) was ob-
tained by reduction of 4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)-1-nitrobenzene11 with
Pd/C in THF (yield 99%).12
2,6-Dibr om o-4-(1H-im id a zol-1-yl)a n ilin e (8). A mixture of
4.73 g (30 mmol) of 7, 26.6 g (67 mmol) of BTMA Br3, and 7.60
g of CaCO3 in 150 mL of CH2Cl2 and 60 mL of MeOH was stirred
at room temperature for 2 h. After filtration, the filtrate was
washed with 10% NaHSO3 and extracted with CH2Cl2. The
combined CH2Cl2 extracts were then washed with brine, dried
(MgSO4), evaporated, and chromatographed on silica gel with
ethyl acetate. Crystallization from hexane-ethyl acetate gave
8 as colorless prisms in 52% yield: mp 172-173 °C; 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 4.69 (s, 2H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.17 (s, 1H), 7.45 (s, 2H),
7.70 (s, 1H). Anal. Calcd for C9H7Br2N3: C, 34.10; H, 2.23; N,
13.26. Found: C, 34.22; H, 2.35; N, 13.47.
(9) All calculations were carried out on Gaussian 98 (Version A.9):
Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A., J r.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.; Daniels,
A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .; Barone, V.;
Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford,
S.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma,
K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J . B.;
Cioslowski, J .; Ortiz, J . V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J .; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.;
Andres, J . L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople,
J . A. Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for P r ep a r a tion of 9. A mixture of
1.00 g (3.2 mmol) of 8, 8.2 mmol of arylboronic acid, 3.5 g of
K2CO3 in 40 mL of benzene, 20 mL of water, and 5 mL of EtOH
was stirred for 30 min, and 0.29 g (0.25 mmol) of Pd(PPh3)4 was
(10) McConnell, H. M. J . Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1910.
(11) J ohnson, A. L.; Kauer, J . C.; Sharma, D. C.; Dorfman, R. I. J .
Med. Chem. 1969, 12, 1024.
(12) Venuti, M. C.; Stephenson, R. A.; Alvavez, R.; Bruno, J . J .;
Strosberg, A. M. J . Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 2136.
10160 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 26, 2003