352 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004, Vol. 47, No. 2
Sirichaiwat et al.
neutralization with diluted aqueous HCl, the reaction mixture
was extracted with CH2Cl2, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated
to dryness. Purification by column chromatography (silica gel,
25% EtOAc/45% hexane as eluent) gave compound 15 as a
white solid. NMR spectra of compounds 15a -c indicated that
they were of high purity; therefore, compounds 15a -c were
used in the next step without further purification.
4-[3-(4-Tolu en esu lfon yl)p r op oxy]b en za ld eh yd e (15a ,
R ) H): white solid (10.4 g, 62%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 2.17 (2H, quint, J ) 5.4 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 2.37 (3H, s,
ArCH3), 4.06 (2H, t, J ) 5.4 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 4.26 (2H, t,
J ) 5.4 Hz, CH2CH2OSO2), 6.88 (2H, d, J ) 8.3 Hz, ArH), 7.25
(2H, d, J ) 7.8 Hz, ArH), 7.76 (2H, d, J ) 7.8 Hz, ArH), 7.81
(2H, d, J ) 8.3 Hz, ArH), 9.90 (1H, s, CHO).
3-Meth oxy-4-[3-(4-tolu en esu lfon yl)p r op oxy]ben za ld e-
h yd e (15b, R ) OMe): white solid (10.7 g, 59%); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.23 (2H, tt, J ) 5.9, 6.0 Hz, CH2CH2-
CH2), 2.38 (3H, s, ArCH3), 3.88 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.18 (2H, t, J )
6.0 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 4.30 (2H, t, J ) 5.9 Hz, CH2CH2OSO2),
6.89 (1H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH), 7.25 (2H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH),
7.40 (1H, d, J ) 1.3 Hz, ArH), 7.43 (1H, dd, J ) 8.1, 1.3 Hz,
ArH), 7.77 (2H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH), 9.87(1H, s, CHO).
3-E t h oxy-4-[3-(4-t olu en esu lfon yl)p r op oxy]b en za ld e-
h yd e (15c, R ) OEt): white solid (12.5 g, 66%); 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.42 (3H, t,J ) 6.9 Hz, CH2CH3), 2.21 (2H,
quint, J ) 5.9 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 2.37 (3H, s, CH3), 4.08 (4H,
m, ArOCH2CH2, ArOCH2CH3), 4.29 (2H, t, J ) 5.9 Hz,
CH2CH2OSO2), 6.87 (1H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH), 7.23 (2H, d, J )
8.1 Hz, ArH), 7.37 (1H, s, ArH), 7.39 (1H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH),
7.75 (2H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH), 9.85 (1H, s, CHO).
activities and are therefore of higher potential interest.
These compounds also exhibited IC50 values against
wild type and resistant parasites at low micromolar
levels, which correlated well with their binding affinity.
Molecular modeling studies of pfDHFR bound with
trimethoprim derivatives bearing aromatic substituents
showed the stacking of the aromatic substituent with
the phenyl side chain of Phe116. Evidently, this interac-
tion led to better binding affinity to both wild type and
mutant enzymes than those derivatives bearing alkoxy
substituents.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Meth od s a n d Ma ter ia ls. For the synthesis of TMP ana-
logues, solvents (DMSO, ethanol, and dioxane) were dried
according to standard methods. Reagents were purchased from
Fluka, Merck, and Sigma-Aldrich Ltd. and were distilled before
use. For enzyme studies, chemicals were obtained from Sigma-
Aldrich Ltd., Merck, and BDH and were used without further
purification. Melting points were determined by an Electro-
thermal 9100 melting point apparatus and were uncorrected.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded in
DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 on a Bruker DRX 400 spectrometer;
chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) using
TMS (0 ppm) as the internal standard. Mass spectra were
recorded on a Micromass LCT using the electrospray ionization
technique. Elemental analyses were carried out using a
Perkin-Elmer elemental analyzer 2400.
Ch em ica l Syn th eses of TMP An a logu es. TMP analogues
were synthesized by an improved method described in a
previous study,15 as shown in Scheme 1, and the results are
summarized in Table 1. The general procedure for the syn-
theses of long-chain ether-substitued benzaldehyde is outlined
in Scheme 2.
P r ep a r a tion of Com p ou n d 14. To a suspension of K2CO3
(15.2 g, 0.11 mol) in DMF (10 mL) was added a solution of
3-substitued 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (12, 0.1 mol) in DMF (10
mL). After the reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C for 30
min, a solution of 3-chloro-1-propanol (13, 9.2 g, 0.11 mol) in
DMF (5 mL) was added dropwise and the mixture was left
stirring at 60 °C overnight. The mixture was neutralized with
diluted aqueous HCl and then extracted with CH2Cl2, dried
over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pres-
sure to yield the crude product as a yellow oil. The crude
product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel,
55% EtOAc/45% hexane as developing solvent) to obtain the
desired product as a colorless oil.
4-(3-Hyd r oxyp r op oxy)ben za ld eh yd e (14a , R ) H): col-
orless oil (13.7 g, 76%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.02 (2H,
quint, J ) 6.1 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 3.06 (1H, s, OH), 3.81 (2H, t,
J ) 6.1 Hz, HOCH2CH2), 4.13 (2H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, ArOCH2-
CH2), 6.94 (2H, d, J ) 8.6 Hz, ArH), 7.74 (2H, d, J ) 8.6 Hz,
ArH), 9.78 (1H, s, CHO).
3-Met h oxy-4-(3-h yd r oxyp r op oxy)b en za ld eh yd e (14b,
R ) OMe): colorless oil (17.0 g, 81%); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 2.15 (2H, tt, J ) 6.0, 4.9 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 2.40 (1H,
bs, OH), 3.91 (2H, t, J ) 4.9 Hz, HOCH2CH2), 3.94 (3H, s,
OCH3), 4.30 (2H, t, J ) 6.0 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 7.01 (1H, d, J )
8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.43 (1H, s, ArH), 7.47 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, ArH),
9.87 (1H, s, CHO).
P r ep a r a tion of Com p ou n d 17. Compound 17 was pre-
pared from substituted phenol (16) and chloropropanol (13)
according to the procedure described for the synthesis of
compound 14 and was purified by column chromatography
(silica gel, 60% EtOAc/40% hexane as eluent). Compounds 17a
and 17b were of high purity (NMR spectra); therefore, they
were used in the next reaction step without additional
purification.
3-P h en oxy-1-p r op a n ol (17a , R′ ) H): colorless oil (10.5
1
g, 69%); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.03 (2H, tt, J ) 6.1,
6.2, Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 3.61 (1H, bs, OH), 3.82 (2H, t, J ) 6.2
Hz, CH2CH2OH), 4.07 (2H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 6.97
(3H, m, ArH), 7.32 (2H, m, ArH).
3-(2,4,5-Tr ich lor op h en oxy)-1-p r op a n ol (17b, R′ ) 2,4,5-
tr ich lor o): colorless oil (18.4 g, 72%); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 2.09 (2H, tt, J ) 6.0, 5.8, Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 2.42 (1H,
bs, OH), 3.88 (2H, t, J ) 5.8 Hz, CH2CH2OH), 4.15 (2H, t, J )
6.0 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 7.0 (1H, d, J ) 4.6 Hz, ArH), 7.42 (1H,
d, J ) 4.6 Hz, ArH).
P r ep a r a tion of Com p ou n d 18. To a suspension of NaH
(0.92 g, 21 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) at 0 °C was added a solution
of alcohol 17 (20 mmol) in DMF (3 mL), and the reaction
mixture was left stirring at 0 °C for 30 min. Then a solution
of aldehyde 15 (21 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added. After
continuous stirring at 0 °C for 2 h, the reaction mixture was
carefully neutralized with diluted aqueous HCl solution,
extracted with CH2Cl2, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to
dryness. Purification by column chromatography (silica gel,
40% EtOAc/75% hexane as eluent) gave pure compound 18 as
a colorless oil.
4-[3-(3-P h en oxyp r op oxy)p r op oxy]ben za ld eh yd e (18a ,
1
R ) R′ ) H): colorless oil (2.4 g, 38%); H NMR (400 MHz,
3-E t h oxy-4-(3-h yd r oxyp r op oxy)b en za ld eh yd e (14c,
R ) OEt): colorless oil (16.1 g, 72%); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.47 (3H, t, J ) 7.0 Hz, OCH2CH3), 2.14 (2H, quint,
J ) 5.6 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 2.730 (1H, t, J ) 5.7 Hz, CH2OH),
3.91 (2H, dt, J ) 5.6, 5.6 Hz, HOCH2CH2), 4.21 (2H, q, J )
7.0 Hz, OCH2CH3), 4.29 (2H, t, J ) 5.7 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 6.99
(1H, d, J ) 8.1 Hz, ArH), 7.40 (1H, d, J ) 1.6 Hz, ArH), 7.44
(1H, dd, J ) 8.1, 1.6 Hz, ArH), 9.85 (1H, s, CHO).
P r ep a r a tion of Com p ou n d 15. To a solution of compound
14 (0.05 mol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) and Et3N (9 mL) was added
p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (14.3 g, 0.075 mol) at 0 °C, and the
reaction mixture was continuously stirred for 2 h. After
CDCl3) δ 2.08 (4H, m, 2 × CH2CH2CH2), 3.65 (4H, t, J ) 6.0
Hz, 2 × OCH2CH2), 4.06 (2H, t, J ) 6.2 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 4.15
(2H, t, J ) 6.3 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 6.89 (2H, d, J ) 8.3 Hz, ArH),
6.97 (3H, m, ArH), 7.28 (3H, m, ArH), 7.82 (2H, d, J ) 8.4 Hz,
ArH), 9.89 (1H, s, CHO).
3-Met h oxy-4-[3-(3-p h en oxyp r op oxy)p r op oxy]b en za l-
d eh yd e (18b, R ) OMe, R′ ) H): colorless oil (2.5 g, 36%);
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.01 (2H, quint, J ) 6.4 Hz,
CH2CH2CH2), 2.13 (2H, quint, J ) 6.2 Hz, CH2CH2CH2), 3.62
(4H, m, 2 × OCH2CH2), 3.86 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.02 (2H, t, J )
6.2 Hz, ArOCH2CH2), 4.18 (2H, t, J ) 6.4 Hz, ArOCH2CH2),