filtered off, washed with 15 ml of absolute ethanol and then
recrystallized from ethanol–chloroform(1 : 3, v/v).
6c. Brownish green. Yield 85%. Anal. Calcd for
C44H54N6O5V: C, 66.25; H, 6.77; N, 10.54. Found: C, 66.14;
H, 6.49; N, 10.38%.
7c. Brownish green. Yield 78%. Anal. Calcd for
C45H56N6O5V: C, 66.59; H, 6.90; N, 10.36. Found: C, 66.37;
H, 6.72; N, 10.10%.
2a. Yellow. Yield 90%. Mp 215 ꢁC. 1HNMR d 13.91
(s,H8), 8.48(s,H9), 7.94(dd,H2), 7.90–7.82(H3,4,7), 7.06(d,H1),
6.98(d,H5,6), 4.02(t,H10), 3.78(s, N–CH2), 1.84 (p, O–C–
=
CH2),1.55(q, O–C–C–CH2) 0.89(t, CH3).
2b. Yellow. Yield 85%. Mp 210 ꢁC. 1HNMR d 13.90
(s,H8), 8.49(s,H9), 7.93(dd,H2), 7.91–7.81(H3,4,7), 7.05(d,H1),
6.99(d,H5,6), 4.03(t,H10), 3.78(s, N–CH2), 1.83–0.90(30H,
=
3
Result and discussion
alkyl chain).
3a. Yellow. Yield 87%. Mp 158 ꢁC. 1HNMR d 13.92
3.1 Synthesis
(s,H8), 8.47(s,H9), 7.94(dd,H2), 7.91–7.82(H3,4,7), 7.05(d,H1),
6.99(d,H5,6), 4.02(t,H10), 3.79(s, N–CH2), 2.18(m, N–C–
CH2), 1.85 (p, O–C–CH2), 1.57(q, O–C–C–CH2) 0.91(t, CH3).
=
=
The 5-(4-alkoxyphenylazo)salicylaldehyde homologues (1a,b),
Schiff-base ligand homologues (2a,b, 3a,b) and related metal
complexes were obtained in good yields and purity. Aldehyde
and ligand homologues were characterized by IR and 1H
NMR spectroscopy and complexes were characterized by C,
H, N elemental analysis and IR spectroscopy. Some physical
and characterization data for ligands and complexes are given
in the experimental section and some selected IR data are
reported in Table 1. For the IR spectra of metal complexes,
3b. Yellow. Yield 91%. Mp 152 ꢁC. HNMR d 13.90(s,H8),
1
8.48(s,H9),
7.94(dd,H2),
7.91–7.81(H3,4,7),
=
7.06(d,H1),
=
6.98(d,H5,6), 4.02(t,H10), 3.78(s, N–CH2), 2.17(m, N–C–
CH2), 1.85–0.90 (30H, alkyl chain).
Syntheses of the copper and nickel complexes. Copper and
nickel complexes were prepared in a similar manner. A solu-
tion of 0.004 mole of Ni(OAc)2ꢂ4H2O or Cu(OAc)2ꢂH2O in
10 ml of ethanol was added to an ethanol–chloroform(1 : 1
v/v) solution containing 0.004 mole of ligand and refluxed
for 2 h. The obtained solution was left at room temperature.
Copper complexes were obtained as brown micro crystals,
and nickel complexes were obtained as green micro crystals.
The micro crystals were filtered off, washed with absolute
ethanol and then recrystallized from ethanol–chloroform
(1 : 3 v/v).
4a. Brown. Yield 80%. Anal. Calcd for C36H38N6O4Cu:
C, 63.39; H, 5.57; N, 12.32. Found: C, 63.16; H, 5.33; N,
12.18%.
4b. Green. Yield 85%. Anal. Calcd for C36H38N6O4Ni:
C, 63.84; H, 5.61; N, 12.41. Found: C, 63.66; H, 5.30; N,
12.25%.
uC N shifted to lower wavenumbers by 10–30 cmꢀ1 upon coor-
=
dination. On the other hand, the disappearance of the OH
band of free ligands in metal complexes indicates that the
OH group has been deprotonated and connected to the metal
ion as –Oꢀ. On the basis of these observations it can be con-
cluded that the Schiff-base ligands are coordinated to metal
atoms as tetradentate ONNO ligands.
It is well known that the Ni(II) coordination geometry in
salen type ligands is usually square planar.21,22
We recently reported the crystal structure of [bis(5-pheny-
lazo salicylaldehyde)-trimethylendiiminato] copper(II)23 which
has a similar ONNO coordination environment to that of
the title complex of this work. However it is suggested that
the Cu(II) coordination is square planar or nearly square pla-
nar from its similar coordination environment to a recently
reported copper(II) complex.21,22,24
5a. Brown. Yield 75%. Anal. Calcd for C37H40N6O4Cu:
C, 63.84; H, 5.75; N, 12.07. Found: C, 63.61; H, 5.49; N,
11.86%.
5b. Green. Yield 86%. Anal. Calcd for C37H40N6O4Ni:
C, 64.28; H, 5.79; N, 12.16. Found: C, 64.03; H, 5.54; N,
11.94%.
6a. Brown. Yield 74%. Anal. Calcd for C44H54N6O4Cu:
C, 66.54; H, 6.80; N, 10.59. Found: C, 66.39; H, 6.50; N,
10.47%.
6b. Green. Yield 75%. Anal. Calcd for C44H54N6O4Ni:
C, 66.94; H, 6.85; N, 10.65. Found: C, 66.73; H, 6.55; N,
10.40%.
VO complexes with salen type ligands can give rise either to
monomeric structure25–27 with square pyramidal coordination
geometry or to polymeric structures26–29 with [V Oꢂ ꢂ ꢂV O]
=
=
interactions which afford a distorted octahedral geometry.
=
However on the basis of the position of the V O band in IR
spectra25–31 we can distinguish between the monomeric or
polymeric nature of these complexes. In this work, the VO
complexes with –CH2CH2– bridge show uV
at 995.93
=
O
cmꢀ1, according to which result, a square pyramid coordina-
tion is assigned to the salen derivative. In the case of complexes
7a. Brown. Yield 80%. Anal. Calcd for C45H56N6O4Cu:
C, 66.87; H, 6.93; N, 10.40. Found: C, 66.68; H, 6.65; N,
10.22%.
Table 1 Selected IR data for Schiff base ligands and metal complexes
n/cmꢀ1
7b. Green. Yield 78%. Anal. Calcd for C45H56N6O4Ni:
C, 67.27; H, 6.97; N, 10.46. Found: C, 66.95; H, 6.69; N,
10.24%.
C–H C–H
(aromatic) (aliphatic)
C–O
=
(etheric) C O V O
=
=
Compound O–H
C
–
N
1(a,b)
2(a,b)
3(a,b)
3185
(br,m)
3420
(br,m)
3441
(br,m)
3055(m)
3040(m)
3060(m)
2952,
2866(s)
2955,
2872(s)
2965,
2871(s)
1239(s) 1660 —
1637(s) 1248(s)
1634(s) 1247(s)
—
—
—
Syntheses of the oxovanadium(IV) complexes. 0.004 mol of
VO(acac)2 was added to 70 ml of dichloromethane hot solu-
tion containing 0.004 mol of ligand and a few drops of triethy-
lamine and refluxed for 1 h. The resulting yellow precipitate
was collected by filtration and washed with dichloromethane
and ether and recrystallized from ethanol–chloroform (1 : 3
v/v).
4c. Brownish green. Yield 85%. Anal. Calcd for
C36H38N6O5V: C, 63.07; H, 5.55; N, 12.26. Found: C, 62.88;
H, 5.34; N, 12.04%.
—
(4,6)a
(4,6)b
—
—
3042(m)
3055(m)
2925(s)
2955,
1626(s) 1250(s)
1618(s) 1249(s)
—
—
—
—
2870(s)
2936,
2869(s)
(4,6)c
—
3047(m)
1620(s) 1255(s)
—
995(s)
(5,7)a
(5,7)b
—
—
3037(m)
3050(m)
2924(s)
2923,
1616(s) 1252(s)
1630(s) 1250(s)
—
—
—
—
2834(s)
2 2935,2864(s) 1620(s) 1248(s)
5c. Brownish green. Yield 80%. Anal. Calcd for
C37H40N6O5V: C, 63.52; H, 5.72; N, 12.02. Found: C, 66.43;
H, 5.51; N, 11.88%.
(5,7)c
—
3066(m)
—
842(s)
s: strong, m: medium
New J. Chem., 2003, 27, 1665–1669
1667