Published on Web 09/18/2008
Toward a Prostate Specific Antigen-Based Prostate Cancer
Diagnostic Assay: Preparation of Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin
-Conjugated Normal and Transformed Prostate Specific
Antigen Fragments
Vadim Y. Dudkin,† Justin S. Miller,† Anna S. Dudkina,† Christophe Antczak,‡
David A. Scheinberg,‡ and Samuel J. Danishefsky*,†,§
Laboratory for Bioorganic Chemistry, and Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program,
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, 1275 York AVenue, New York, New York 10065,
and Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniVersity, HaVemeyer Hall, 3000 Broadway,
New York, New York 10027
Received April 30, 2008; E-mail: s-danishefsky@mskcc.org
Abstract: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) molecules secreted by cancerous and normal prostate cells differ
in their N-linked glycan composition, while the peptide backbone appears to be conserved. Antibodies
selectively recognizing such differentially glycosylated PSA structures could form a basis for a new diagnostic
assay for prostate cancer. Twenty-amino acid PSA fragments carrying di-, tri-, and tetrabranched complex-
type glycans were prepared by total synthesis and conjugated to maleimide-modified keyhole limpet
hemocyanin (KLH) carrier protein through backbone Cys residues. These glycopeptide/KLH conjugates
were then used for antibody generation.
tics.7 PSA, a 28-kDa glycoprotein secreted exclusively by the
prostatic epithelium, consists of 237 amino acids and contains
Introduction
The development of aberrant protein glycosylation patterns
has long been recognized as one of the indicative changes that
accompany malignant transformation of a cell.1 In particular,
the advanced branching of N-linked carbohydrates has been
associated with the onset of metastasis of several types of
cancer,2 including breast,3 colon,4 and lung.5 Our program,
directed toward the fashioning and evaluation of anticancer
vaccines, is based on exploiting differences in oligosaccharide
epitope expression between normal and transformed cells.6
The work described herein seeks to take advantage of tumor-
selective glycosylation patterns at a different level. Modified
cellular glycosylation patterns may provide a potentially valu-
able, yet largely unexplored, opportunity for enhanced cancer
diagnostics. A recent discovery of advanced branching in the
glycoforms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) isolated from the
LnCaP prostate cancer cell line, and not found in normal prostate
cells, is potentially interesting from the perspective of diagnos-
a single N-glycosylation site.8 The high tissue selectivity of PSA
renders it potentially valuable as a marker for emerging prostate
cancer. The development of immunoassays to measure PSA
levels has provided an important breakthrough in prostate cancer
diagnostics.9 Unfortunately, the very common problem of
interpreting borderline PSA levels, necessary to differentiate
between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, has
consistently complicated the efforts of clinicians.10 A number
of methods have been suggested to overcome this problem,
including determinations of free vs total PSA11 (PSA index)
and monitoring the increase of PSA levels for a particular
patient12 (PSA velocity); however, the utility of such potential
measures remains unverified.13
All current state-of-the-art PSA-directed immunoassays em-
ploy antibodies that recognize only its peptide backbone. Such
(7) (a) Armbruster, D. A. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 181. (b) Abrahamsson,
P. A.; Lilja, H.; Oesterling, J. E. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 1997, 24, 353. (c)
Egawa, S. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2001, 55, 130.
† Laboratory for Bioorganic Chemistry, Sloan-Kettering Institute for
Cancer Research.
(8) Okada, T.; Sato, Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Sumida, K.; Satomura, S.;
Matsuura, S.; Takasaki, M.; Endo, T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001,
1525, 149.
‡ Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Sloan-Kettering
Institute for Cancer Research.
§ Department of Chemistry, Columbia University.
(1) Dennis, J. W.; Granovsky, M.; Warren, C. E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1999, 1473, 21.
(9) Ward, A. M.; Catto, J. W. F.; Hamdy, F. C. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2001,
38, 633.
(10) (a) Semjonow, A.; Hertle, L. Urol.-Ausg. A 1995, 34, 290. (b)
Semjonow, A.; Brandt, B.; Oberpenning, F.; Roth, S.; Hertle, L.
Prostate 1996, 3.
(2) Dennis, J. W.; Laferte, S.; Waghorne, C.; Breitman, M. L.; Kerbel,
R. S. Science 1987, 236, 582.
(3) Seberger, P. J.; Chaney, W. G. Glycobiology 1999, 9, 235.
(4) Fernandes, B.; Sagman, U.; Auger, M.; Demetrio, M.; Dennis, J. W.
Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 718.
(11) Demura, T.; Shinohara, N.; Tanaka, M.; Enami, N.; Chiba, H.; Togashi,
M.; Ohashi, N.; Nonomura, K.; Koyanagi, T. Cancer 1996, 77, 1137.
(12) Thiel, R.; Pearson, J. D.; Epstein, J. I.; Walsh, P. C.; Carter, H. B.
Urology 1997, 49, 716.
(5) Lu, Y.; Pelling, J. C.; Chaney, W. G. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 1994, 12,
47.
(13) Catalona, W. J.; Southwick, P. C.; Slawin, K. M.; Partin, A. W.;
Brawer, M. K.; Flanigan, R. C.; Patel, A.; Richie, J. P.; Walsh, P. C.;
Scardino, P. T.; Lange, P. H.; Gasior, G. H.; Loveland, K. G.; Bray,
K. R. Urology 2000, 56, 255.
(6) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Allen, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
836. (b) Ouerfelli, O.; Warren, J. D.; Wilson, R. M.; Danishefsky,
S. J. Exp. ReV. Vaccines 2005, 4, 677.
9
13598 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008, 130, 13598–13607
10.1021/ja8028137 CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society